Taqavi

What is the view of other Islamic schools of thought on Ghulu? The issue of Ghulu is one of the challenging issues in the Islamic world; the theorists of Islamic schools of thought have mentioned many things regarding Ghulu, each of which is of particular importance; now we will address some of the theories presented on the issue of Ghulu from the perspective of other Islamic schools of thought. The Zaydi view on Ghulu: The Zaydi school, like other branches of Shia, believes that Imam Ali (AS) was appointed as the successor of the Messenger of Allah (SAW), and after him, Imam Hassan and Imam Hussein (AS) were also recognized as the Imam and successor of the Prophet (SAW) by divine text. However, after Imam Hussein (AS), the Zaydis separated the position of guardianship and succession of the Prophet (SAW) from the divine and heavenly aspects and turned it into a worldly position. From the Zaydi point of view, the Imams after Imam Hussein (AS) must be knowledgeable, just, courageous, and managerial personalities, and from the lineage of Lady Fatima (SA), with active presence in the political arena, to command good and forbid evil and to implement divine laws. Among them, Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussein is known as a prominent figure in this lineage. During a period when the Zaydi ideology was based on the belief in knowledgeable, just, courageous, and capable Imams, a group of Zaydi Ghulat engaged in Ghulu and considered some of the Zaydi Imams as the Mahdi and possessors of long life. They attributed great miracles to these Imams, and some even claimed that the rank of these Imams was higher than that of the Prophet himself;[1] These extremist ideas caused some Zaydi scholars to consider these beliefs incorrect and beyond the truth and to write treatises refuting these beliefs. [2] In the end, it must be said that the Zaydi view on Ghulu is similar to that of the Imamiyyah, and Ghulu is considered an encroachment on right and truth, which is a condemned matter, and throughout history, Zaydi scholars have fought against it; although there may be differences between Zaydis and Imamis in the instances of Ghulu. The Ismaili view on ghulu: Like other Islamic sects, Ismailis define ghulu as exceeding the truth and reality. Among the great figures of the Ismaili faith, is Qadi Nu'man ibn Muhammad, whom Ibn Khallikan described as possessing immense greatness, was known as a highly learned and virtuous individual. He was not only proficient in the Quran and its interpretation but also specialized in jurisprudence and juristic disputes. He also possessed extensive knowledge of linguistics, poetry, and history, acting with wisdom and fairness in all these fields. Qadi Nu'man wrote numerous works about the Ahl al-Bayt and authored a valuable book on their virtues. He also wrote works refuting the beliefs of opponents, including Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi'i, and Ibn Sarij.[3] Qadi Nu'man explicitly states that Amir al-Mu'minin Ali (AS) resisted groups that exaggerated about him and presented him as exceeding reality. Some of these individuals believed that Ali (AS) was a prophet and that Gabriel had mistakenly revealed the revelation to the Prophet (SAW). Such beliefs were incorrect and extreme, and Amir al-Mu'minin Ali (AS) always opposed such ideas. [4] According to Ismaili's teachings, any exaggeration and transgression of the truth regarding persons and things is considered undesirable. The only difference in this regard lies in the differing understanding of the instances of exaggeration. These differences have led some sects to accuse other groups of ghulu. In reality, the difference in understanding and interpreting the instances of ghulu has led to diversity and conflict in religious viewpoints. The Sunni view on ghulu: Regarding the Sunni viewpoint, it should be said that Sunnism is internally divided into various groups in terms of jurisprudence, theology, and beliefs, some of which will now be mentioned: Ibn Taymiyyah and his followers throughout history: Ibn Taymiyyah al-Harrani, the founder of Wahhabism, says: "Ghulu" means praising or blaming something more than it deserves;[5] Muhammad Rashid Rida also mentions in his commentary that "ghulu" means exceeding the legal limit and exceeding what the Shari'ah has stipulated. [6] One of the reasons Wahhabi and Salafist theorists often label Shias as disbelievers is the concept of "ghulu." These individuals highlight certain Shia beliefs and associate them with "ghulu" to justify their claims. For instance, the belief that the Infallible Imams (AS) possess knowledge of the unseen is frequently categorized as "ghulu." Consequently, they argue that this belief warrants declaring Shias as disbelievers. In the following sections, we will present various opinions on this topic. Al-Zarqawi, in one of his works, accuses Shias of believing in the Imams’ knowledge of the unseen. He claims that this belief is part of the corrupt ideas held by Shia Muslims. [7] By citing the Shia belief that Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS) possesses knowledge of the unseen, he argues that Shias view the Imams (AS) as equal to Allah, [8] attributing divine status to them. Al-Zarqawi insists that such attributes are only appropriate for Allah Almighty and that assigning them to anyone other than Allah is akin to associating partners with Him. [9] Tartusi attributes such accusations to the Shia community, labeling them as part of the manifestations of Shia "ghulu". He cites numerous hadiths from Usul al-Kafi as evidence for his claims. In these hadiths, Shia beliefs assert that the infallible Imams (AS) possess knowledge of the unseen. [10] Due to this belief, Tartusi accuses them of disbelief and polytheism. He distinguishes between Shias and extreme Shias by stating that extreme Shias openly confess their belief in the divinity of individuals like Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS), while other Shias hold this belief secretly. [11] Traditional scholars, Sufi mystics from Ash'aris and Maturidis: Sunni scholars who lack Wahhabist thought have also identified Ghulat. For example, Shahrestani considers a Ghali to be someone who exaggerates about their Imam to the point of elevating them beyond the status of a creature, whether by ascribing divine attributes to them or claiming Allah's incarnation in them. [12] Abu’l-Baqā’, a Hanafi scholar, in his book "Al-Kulliyat," defines Ghulu as exceeding limits. [13] Baghawi, in his book "Sharh al-Sunnah," interpreting the verse "لَا تَغْلُوا فِي دِينِكُمْ"[14] states that Ghulu means exceeding the measure of a thing. [15] Mulla Ali Qari also defines Ghulu in religion as exceeding the Book and Sunnah.[16] Tabari,[17] Qastalani,[18] and Fakhr al-Razi also defined Ghulu as exceeding the limit or measure of a thing or matter.[19] Al-Alusi, in his abridgment of the book "Tuḥfat al-Ithna ‘Ashariyya," mentions that the first person to exaggerate about Ali ibn Abi Talib was Abdullah ibn Saba’, who affirmed Ali’s Imamate and disavowed his enemies.[20] Haytami, in "Şawā’iq al-Muhriqah," states that the nature of Shi’ism is Ghulu and innovation,[21] and it must be said that Sunnis consider the belief in the infallibility and Imamate of Amir al-Mu'minin to be Ghulu. However, Sunnis have gone so far in describing the virtues of the Companions that some have claimed that they had no shortcomings,[22] and they have described great miracles for them; for example, a story about a woman from the Ansar who dreamed that a date palm tree in her yard had fallen, and the Prophet (SAW) told her that her husband would die on his journey, but Abu Bakr gave her the good news that her husband would return that night, and in the end, this happened, and they explained the reason as follows: Allah was ashamed for a lie to come from the tongue of Abu Bakr; because he is Siddiq. [23] Conclusion: Based on the true and scholarly view of the Sunnis, Shi’ites cannot be considered Ghulat because the views of Sunni and Wahhabi scholars about Ghulu are similar to the views of Shi’ite scholars, who define Ghulu as exceeding the limit or measure of a thing or matter; therefore, exceeding the matter of religion, the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and the truth means Ghulu; whether this Ghulu is about the great figures of religion or other matters. However, differences in understanding the instances and accurately recognizing the position of Ghulu have led to some accusing the Shi’ites. [1] . Resaleh al-Zajereh article: Ali, Mousavi Nejad, Haft Aseman magazine, p. 2. [2] . Ibid: p. 3. [3] . Wafayat al-A’yan: Ibn Khalkan, vol. 5, p. 416. [4] . Da’a’im al-Islam: Qadi Nu’man Maghrebi, vol. 1, p. 48. [5] . Iqtida’ al-Sirat al-Mustaqim li Mukhalafat Ashab al-Jahim: Ibn Taymiyyah, vol. 1, p. 328. [6] . Tafsir al-Manar: Rashid Rida, Muhammad, vol. 6, p. 405. [7] . Articles by Ahmad Fadhil Nazal Al-Khalayleh, The comprehensive archive of the words and speeches of Sheikh Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Al-Buraq Islamic Network, vol. 1, p. 324. (هذا مع اعتقادهم العصمة في أئمتهم، ونسبة علم الغيب والتصرف في الكون إليهم، وغير ذلك من الشركيات التي لا يعذر أحد بجهلها) [8] . Ibid: vol. 1, p.532. (وَمِنْ جَرَائِمِهِمْ فِي جَانِبِ العَقِيدَةِ وَشَعَائِرِ الدِّينِ... أَنَّهُمْ نَشَرُوا العَقَائِدَ الفَاسِدَةَ... ثُمَّ قَالوا بِالرَّجعَةِ وَعِلمِ عَليٍّ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ لِلغَيبِ) [9] . Ibid: vol.1, p.587. (وَكَذَا شَرَّكُوا الإِلَهَ الوَاحِدَ بِالعِبَادِةِ المُستَحَقَّةِ للهِ تَعَالى وَحدَهُ غَيرَهُ، مِن نَذرٍ وَ دُعَاءٍ وَتَقَرُّبٍ بِالعِبَادَةِ للأَئِمَّةِ الذِينَ اعتَبَرُوهُم مُقَدَّسِينَ وَمَعصُومِينَ. وَ لم يَقِف الأَمرُ إِلى هَذَا الحَدِّ بَل نَسَبُوا الصِّفَاتِ التِي يَتَّصِفُ بِهَا اللهُ تَعَالى، كَالرِّزقِ وّالعِلمِ بِالغَيبِ وَنَحوَ ذَلِكَ لهَؤُلاءِ الأَئِمَّةِ، فَلم يَكتَفُوا بِالإِسَاءَةِ لمَقَامِ اللهِ تَعَالى بِالرُّبُوبِيَّةِ وَالأُلُوهِيَّةِ فَحَسب). [10] . Al-Shi’a al-Rawafid Ta’ifah Shirk wa Ridda (The Rawafid Shiites are a sect of polytheism): Abu Basir al-Tartousi, p. 32. [11] . Ibid: p. 45. [12] . Al-Milal wa al-Nihal: al-Shahrastani, vol. 1, p. 173. [13] . al-Kulliyyat: Abu al-Baqa, al-Kafwi, vol. 1, p. 293. [14] . An-Nisa: 171. [15] . Sharh al-Sunna: Abu Muhammad, al-Baghawi, vol. 4, p. 47. [16] . Mirqat al-Mafatih Sharh Mishkat al-Masabih: Mulla Ali al-Qari, vol. 1, p. 322. [17] . Tafsir al-Tabari: Abu Ja’far, Tabari, vol. 7, p. 700. [18] . Irshad al-Sari li Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari: Al-Qastalani, vol. 10, p. 313. [19] . Tafsir al-Razi = Mafatih al-Ghayb aw al-Tafsir al-Kabir: Fakhr al-Din, al-Razi, vol. 12, p. 411. [20] . Mukhtasar al-Tuhfa al-Ithna Ashariyah: Muhammad Shukri, al-Alusi, vol. 1, p. 6. [21] . al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa 'ala Ahl al-Rafd wa al-Dalal wa al-Zandaqa: al-Haytami, Ibn Hajar, vol. 1, p. 10. / Asma al-Matalib fi Sirat Amir al-Mu’minin Ali ibn Abi Talib: Ali Muhammad, al-Sallabi, vol. 1, p. 507. [22] . al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa 'ala Ahl al-Rafd wa al-Dalal wa al-Zandaqa: Ibn Hajar, Haytami, vol. 2, p. 640. [23] . Nuzhat al-Majalis wa Muntakhab al-Nafa’is: al-Safuri, vol. 2, p. 149.

What are the most well-known Ghulat sects in Islam? According to Shia scholars, Ghulat sects are excluded from Islam due to their claims of divinity for certain individuals or their assertions of prophecy for those who are not recognized as prophets. As a result, these groups cannot be considered Muslims, even if they identify themselves as Muslims or as Shia. The Ghulat sects that identify as Muslims or even Shia are numerous; for brevity, some will be briefly mentioned with explanations. The Rawandiyya (Abbassiyya) sect The Rawandiyya (Abbassiyya) sect was led by Abdullah Rawandi. Initially, he believed in the divinity of Mansur Dawaniqi, the Abbasid Caliph, and the prophethood of Abu Muslim Khorasani. However, after Mansur ordered the murder of Abu Muslim in 141 AH, the sect rebelled against Mansur. In response, Mansur charged them with heresy and had them burned. From the Rawandiyya sect, several offshoots emerged, including: - Abu Muslimiya, which believed in the imamate of Abu Muslim Khorasani; - Abu Hurrairyya, led by a man named Abu Hurraira; - Razzamiyya, followers of a figure named Razzam who believed in the incarnation of God in Abu Muslim; and - Hashemiyya, supporters of Abu Hashim Abdullah ibn Muhammad ibn Hanafiya.[1] The Khurramiyya sect The Khurramiyya were followers of Babak Khurramdin and were considered supporters of Abu Muslim Khorasani. Babak Khurramdin led a rebellion against the Abbasid Caliph in the year 201 AH. He was captured by the Iranian commander Afshin during the reign of Caliph Mu'tasim in 223 AH, and ultimately, he was executed after some time. [2] The Junahiyya sect The Junahiyya sect consisted of followers of Abdullah ibn Mu'awiya, whom they regarded as both God and a prophet. They believed that knowledge developed in his heart like a plant and that the spirit of God had been transferred to him. Additionally, they rejected the concept of resurrection, deemed the world indestructible, and considered what is typically forbidden to be permissible. [3] The Sabaiyya sect The Sabaiyya is a sect attributed to the Imamiyyah, led by Abdullah ibn Saba, which emerged in the early years of the Caliphate of Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS) and is considered a group of Ghalian. When Ali (AS) was martyred, the Sabaiyya said that he was not killed, but had gone into occultation and would return to fill the world with justice.[4] The Ahl al-Bayt (AS) cursed him. In a narration, Imam Sajjad (AS) says: "The mention of Abdullah ibn Saba was made to me, and all the hairs of my body stood on end. He claimed a great matter – may God curse him! By God! Imam Ali (AS) was a righteous servant of God and the brother of the Messenger of God (SAW), and he did not reach honor except because of his obedience to God and His Messenger." [5] The Karbiyya sect The Karbiyya are described as the followers of "Ibn Karb." He believed that Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya, nicknamed the Mahdi, was given this title by his father, Imam Ali (a.s.), that he did not die and would not die, and that his death was impossible, but that he is currently absent, and his location is unknown. He will appear and will be the owner of the earth, and there will be no Imam until his return. [6] The Bazighiyya sect Followers of Bazigh ibn Musa believe that Ja'far ibn Muhammad, also known as Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, is God. They hold that he is not merely the physical person people perceive but has taken this form to appear among humanity. The followers believe that whatever occurs in their hearts is a form of revelation, and if a person has faith, they will receive such revelations. [7] The Nusiriyya (Alawiyya) sect T The Nusiriyya was a group that initially believed in the Imamate of Imam Ali ibn Muhammad al-Hadi during his lifetime. However, they later deviated from this belief by claiming the prophethood of a man named Muhammad ibn Nusir al-Namiri. Muhammad ibn Nasir asserted that Imam Hadi (a.s.) had appointed him as a prophet. He also believed in the transmigration of souls related to Imam Hadi, claimed the Lordship of Imam Hadi, and permitted marriage between close relatives, among other beliefs. [8] Other sects such as: Kaysaniyya, the Kaysaniyya sect refers to the followers of Mukhtar ibn Abi Ubayda Thaqafi. [9] Khattabiyya, this sect is attributed to a person named Muhammad ibn Muqlas Asadi Kufi Ajda', a well-known as Abu al-Khattab; Ayatollah Khu'i (may God have mercy on him) referred to him as "لعنه الله" and "غال".[10] Umiriyya, which is attributed to a person named Aumayr ibn Bayan Ajli. [11] Secret Companions (Serriyya), Serri was one of the leaders of the Ghalat during the time of Imam Sadiq (AS), who was cursed by the Imam. [12] Bashariyya (Shu'ayriyya), this sect is attributed to Bashshar Shu'ayri, who lived during the time of Imam Sadiq and Imam Kazim (AS) and passed away in 180 AH. [13] The sects that have deviated from Islam due to Ghulu are numerous. Those interested in learning about them should refer to the books written on this subject.[14] [1] . Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah, p. 37. [2] . Ibid.: p. 38. [3] . Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan, vol. 1, p. 6. [4] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 22 / Many stories have been made about Abdullah bin Saba: Tarikh al-Tabari: al-Tabari, Ibn Jarir, vol. 3, p. 378. [5] . Ikhtiyār Ma’rifat al-Rijāl (Rijāl al-Kashshī):Al-Shaykh Al-Tusi, Volume: 1, Page: 324. [6] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 27. [7] . Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan, vol. 1, p. 12. [8] . Al-Ghaybah: Al-Shaykh Al-Tusi, Vol: 1, P. 398. / Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 93 / Syrian Alawites from Formation to Empowerment: Dr. Masoud Akhavan Kazemi; Sara Weisi, Shia Studies Quarterly, Pages 147 to 186, Year 10, Issue 38, Summer 1391. [9] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 23. [10] . Mu’jam Rijal al-Hadith: vol. 15, p. 271. [11] . Dā’irat al-Ma’ārif-e Bozorg-e Islāmī (The Great Islamic Encyclopedia): vol. 11, p. 314. [12] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 43. [13] . Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah, p. 111. [14] . Books such as Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa. / Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan. / Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah.

How can Ghulu (exaggeration) be countered? Ghulu (extremism in religious beliefs) is a major problem that can cause religious and social harm in society. To counter this phenomenon, attention to Islamic teachings, the use of rational principles, and following the traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) offer effective solutions. In the following, methods of countering Ghulu will be discussed in simple language: 1. Following the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) as the best model The best way to counter Ghulu is to follow and act upon the sayings and behavior of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and to take them as role models. As the Prophet (SAW) said: “They are with the truth, and the truth is with them,”[1] Imam Ali (AS) says: No one from this Ummah can be compared to the Ahl al-Bayt of Muhammad (SAW), and no one whose blessings have been bestowed because of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) can ever be equated with them. They are the foundation of religion and the pillar of certainty. Whoever exaggerates must return to them, and whoever lags behind must join them. [2] Imam Reza (AS) also says: We, the family of Muhammad (SAW), are on the middle path, which the exaggerators do not comprehend and the laggards do not surpass. [3] Imam Baqir (AS) says: Go to the east and west; but you will not find correct knowledge except what comes from us, the Ahl al-Bayt. [4] Therefore, following and taking the Imams (AS) as role models will prevent believers from extremism and will guide them onto the “straight path.” 2. Correct religious education One of the most important ways to counter exaggeration is through principled and correct religious education. When people have a correct understanding of the fundamental beliefs and laws, they are less likely to fall into exaggeration or laxity. Imam Ali (AS) says: O people, the perfection of religion is in the pursuit of knowledge and acting upon it, and be aware that acquiring knowledge is more obligatory than seeking wealth. [5] Correct learning and understanding of religion can prevent individuals from falling into the trap of exaggeration. 3. Emphasis on Moderation and Balance The Holy Quran and the narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) have always invited Muslims to moderation and balance in beliefs and actions; the holy Quran stated: "وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا",[6] And thus We have made you a middle nation; In explaining this verse, Imam Baqir (AS) says: We are the most moderate group, as Allah says in this verse: "وَ كَذلِكَ جَعَلْناکُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطاً"; he who has risen too high [gone beyond the truth] must return to us [who are in the middle], and he who has fallen behind must reach us. [7] This emphasis on "moderation" is the best approach to prevent exaggeration. Moderation in beliefs and lifestyle keeps Muslims from deviating towards extremism or laxity. 4. Scientific and Logical Criticism of Beliefs Paying attention to scientific criticism and logical analysis of beliefs is also very effective in confronting exaggeration; in the book Al-Fusul Al-Mukhtara by Al-Shaykh al-Mufīd, many discussions are presented about criticizing extremist beliefs and providing logical reasons for refuting them; [8] this approach helps clarify the truth and prevent misleading. 5. Warning and Caution against Exaggeration The Infallibles (AS) always explicitly warned people against falling into the trap of exaggeration. For example, Imam Ali (AS) said: "Two groups will be destroyed concerning me: one, enemies who will exaggerate in hatred and enmity, and the other, friends who will exaggerate in their love for me and go beyond the limit." [9] These words show that even love for the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) should not exceed the limits of moderation, as excessive love can also be harmful. In a narration from Imam Sadiq (AS), it is also mentioned that he forbade praying behind an exaggerator. [10] These prohibitions double the importance of knowing the correct path and acting in moderation. 6. Disavowal and Confrontation with Exaggerators In many cases, the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) even distanced themselves from exaggerators and explicitly expressed their disapproval of them. Imam Ali (AS) said: “O Allah, I hate the extremists, just as Jesus, son of Mary, hated the extremists among the Christians. O Allah, forsake them forever and do not help any of them!”[11] The other Imams of the Household of Prophethood also strongly rejected the exaggerators. [12] 7. The Role of Enemies in Creating Excess Some extremist and deviant currents stem from the plots of enemies to destroy the image of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). The enemies of religion, by fabricating exaggerated statements about the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and attributing them to the Imams (AS), sought to mislead people and distance them from the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Imam Reza (AS) clearly states: “Our opponents have fabricated stories about our virtues and categorized them into three types: first, exaggeration; second, laxity regarding our status; and third, a direct mention of the faults of our enemies. When people hear the exaggerations about us, they label our followers as infidels and accuse them of believing in our divinity. When they encounter the laxity, they begin to believe it applies to us. And when they hear explicit mention of our enemies’ faults, they insult us by name.” [13] Therefore, recognizing these plots and being aware of the source of extremist beliefs is another way to combat exaggeration. 8. Use of Media and Communication Tools In today's world, communication tools can play an important role in enlightenment and awareness. Publishing articles, holding discussion sessions, and using social networks to promote correct religious viewpoints can help reduce exaggeration, as the recommendation of the Holy Quran is the same; the Quran says in one place: "Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good counsel and argue with them in a way that is best;" [14] and in another place it says: "And there should be among you a group who invite to good, enjoin what is right, and forbid what is wrong. And it is they who are successful." [15] Conclusion In summary, by utilizing proper religious education, following the traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), promoting moderation, scientific analysis, etc., we can avoid exaggeration and extremism in religious beliefs and move towards moderation and balance in religion, creating a balanced, aware society free from religious extremism and excess. [1] . Ali (AS) ma’a al-haqq wa al-haqq ma’a Ali (AS): Abū Ma’āsh, Sa’īd, Vol: 1, P: 51. [2] . Nahj al-Balagha: Imam Ali (AS), sermon 2. [3] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni Vol: 1 P: 101. [4] . Ibid.: P: 399. [5] . Tuḥaf al-'Uqūl: Ibn Sha'ba al-Hārānī, Vol:1, P:199. [6] . Al-Baqarah: 143. [7] . Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allameh al-Majlisi, Vol: 23, P: 349. [8] . Al-Fusul al-Mukhtara: Al-Shaykh al-Mufīd. [9] . Nahj al-Balagha: Imam Ali (AS), Hikmat 117. / Bihar al-Anwar: al-Allamah al-Majlisi; Vol: 34, P: 307. [10] . Tahdhib Al-Ahkam: Sheikh Tusi, Vol. 3, p. 31. [11] . Al-Amali: Sheikh Tusi Vol. 1 Page: 650. [12] . For further reading refer to the book "Ahlul Bayt (AS) in the Quran and Hadith" under the title “Ahlul Bayt’s Dislike of Exaggerators”: Ahlul Bayt (AS) in the Quran and Hadith: Mohammadi Rayshahri, Muhammad, Vol. 2, p. 810. [13] . Uyun Akhbar Al-Ridha (AS): Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 304. [14] . An-Nahl: 125. [15] . Al-Imran: 104

What is Nubuwwah (Prophethood) and the Difference Between Nubuwwah and Risalah (Messengership)? Meaning of Nubuwwah: The Arabic word "Nubuwwah" (prophethood) is derived from the root "naba," which encompasses meanings such as to inform,[1] a high place, [2] a clear path, [3] and a hidden voice. [4] In Islamic terminology, Nubuwwah refers to a position that guides a person toward either happiness or misery. [5] Some key definitions of Nubuwwah are as follows: • Allama Hilli: A Nabi is an individual who delivers the divine message directly from Allah without any intermediary. [6] • Allama Kashif al-Ghita: Nubuwwah is a status granted to invite people toward the truth. [7] • Allama Tabatabai: A Nabi is someone who explains both the fundamental and detailed principles of religion, showing the path to the worldly and spiritual success of people. This position is a divine blessing for guiding humanity toward happiness.[8] • Ayatollah Subhani: A Nabi is someone who receives teachings directly from the unseen realm, becoming a direct recipient of Allah's manifestation. [9] Therefore, Nubuwwah is a divine selection whereby Allah reveals His knowledge to a chosen servant, guiding humanity toward righteousness. [10] It is important to note that belief in Nubuwwah is essential in Islam and all Abrahamic religions. [11] Meaning of Risalah: Before exploring the differences between Nubuwwah and Risalah, it is important to define "Rasul" and "Risalah": • The term "Rasul" (Messenger) in Arabic means a bringer of news or a sent one. [12] • In technical terms, a Rasul is one who carries a specific divine message, often involving a warning of punishment or destruction for those who reject the message.[13] Another definition is that a Rasul is someone who receives divine commandments through intermediaries, such as angels, and Gabriel delivers Allah's commands to them. [14] Differences Between a Nabi (Prophet) and a Rasul (Messenger): • General and Specific Relationship: One of the key aspects of the relationship between Nubuwwah and Risalah is that Risalah is a more specific concept than Nubuwwah. In other words, every Rasul is a Nabi, but not every prophet is necessarily a Rasul. Some Nabis reach the status of Rasuls, while others do not. This is often described as a general and specific relationship. [15] As Shaykh Mufid and Shaykh Tabarsi state: "Every Rasul is a Nabi, but not every Nabi is a Rasul." [16] Some scholars have disagreed with this view, asserting that there is an equal relationship between the concepts of a Nabi and a Rasul in terms of their meaning. They have argued that wherever there is Nubuwwah, there has also been Risalah, and that Nabis without a Risalah are rare and few in number. These rare instances are not sufficient to determine the general rule, and furthermore, a Nubuwwah without a Risalah lacks a clear meaning. [17] When these two terms are used together, as in the verse "And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet except that when he spoke, Satan threw into his wish,"[18] the terms "Nabi" and "Rasul" are defined as follows: "A Nabi" refers to an individual who receives teachings directly from the unseen realm without an intermediary, and Allah reveals Himself to him without any means. On the other hand, "a Rasul" refers to one who receives divine messages through intermediaries and means, such as an angel or others. [19] Nubuwwah is considered to have a higher rank than Risalah. [20] • Revelation Reception: A Rasul receives revelation both during wakefulness and sleep, while a Nabi receives revelation only in their sleep. [21] • Intermediary in Receiving the Message: A Rasul receives Allah's revelation through the angel Gabriel. In contrast, a Nabi may receive divine messages through other angels, direct inspiration, or true dreams. [22] • Mission and Duty: A Rasul's primary duty is to deliver God's message to the people, whereas a Nabi does not have the same obligation. Shaykh Tusi also mentions this difference. [23] • Nature of the Status: Nubuwwah involves direct contact with the unseen realm, whereas Risalah is about delivering God's message and fulfilling a specific mission.[24] In conclusion, we can say: • A person who receives the divine message is called a Nabi with respect to receiving the message. • A person who conveys that message to the people is called a Rasul with respect to delivering the message. According to one perspective, Nubuwwah and Risalah are distinct positions, with some individuals being both Nabis and Rasuls. However, from another perspective, they are seen as inherently connected, as wherever there is Nubuwwah, there is also Risalah. The difference arises from the different angles through which these positions are viewed. [1] . Lisan al-Arab: Ibn Manzur, vol. 1, p. 162 / Majma' al-Bahrayn: Turayhi, vol. 1, p. 405. [2] . Lisan al-Arab: Ibn Manzur, vol. 1, p. 163. [3] . Al-'Ayn: Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi, vol. 8, p. 382. [4] . Al-Sihah: Jawhari, vol. 1, p. 74. [5] . Sharh Arba'een Hadith: Imam Khomeini, Sayyid Ruhollah, vol. 1, p. 200. [6] . Bāb al-Hādi 'Ashar: Allama Hilli, p. 8. [7] . Asl al-Shi'a wa Usulaha: Shaykh Muhammad Hasan, Kashif al-Ghita, vol. 1, p. 220. [8] . Tafseer al-Mizan: Allama Tabatabai, vol. 2, p. 210. [9] . Manshur Javid: Shaykh Ja'far Subhani, vol. 3, p. 328. [10] . "A Dialogue Between Three Divine Religions on the Meaning of Prophecy": Azam Parcham, Quarterly Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities (University of Isfahan), Vols. 16 and 17, p. 112. [11] . Daramadi be Shi'a-shanasi: Golpaygani, Rabbani, p. 195. [12] . Al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran: al-Qasim al-Husayn ibn Muhammad, al-Raghib al-Isfahani, vol. 1, p. 353. [13] . Al-Mizan fi Tafseer al-Quran: Muhammad Hussain Tabatabai, vol. 2, p. 140. [14] . Manshur Javid: Shaykh Ja'far Subhani, vol. 3, p. 328. [15] . Shahid Mutahari in defining 'Aam and Khaas Mutlaq says: The smaller general category is included within the larger circle. Ashnayi ba 'Olum Islami: Murtaza Mutahari, vol. 1, p. 45. [16] . Awa'il al-Maqalat fi al-Madhahib wa al-Mukhtarāt: Shaykh al-Mufid, part: 1, p. 45 / Majma' al-Bayan fi Tafseer al-Quran: Shaykh al-Tabarsi, vol. 7, p. 163. [17] . Manshur Javid: Shaykh Ja'far Subhani, vol. 3, p. 325. [18] . Hajj: 52. [19] . Manishur Javid: Shaykh Ja'far Subhani, vol. 3, p. 328. [20] . Ibid.: vol. 3, p. 329. [21] . Mu'jam al-Furuq al-Lughawiyya al-Furuq al-Lughawiyya bi Tartib wa Ziyada: Abu Hilal al-‘Askari, vol. 1, p. 531 / Usul al-Kafi: al-Kulaini, vol. 1, p. 176. [22] . Al-Tarifat: Jurjani, p. 105. [23] . Tafseer al-Tabyan: Shaykh al-Tusi, vol. 7, p. 331. [24] . Manshur Javid: Shaykh Ja'far Subhani, vol. 3, p. 324.

What is the perspective of the Quran and the narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) regarding Ghulu? The issue of Ghulu (exaggeration) is a complex and sensitive topic within Islamic beliefs. The Quran and the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) traditions have addressed this matter extensively. Through numerous verses, the Quran warns Muslims against the excesses of Ghulu and encourages moderation. Similarly, the narrations of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) emphasize the importance of avoiding this extremist ideology and striving to protect Muslims from falling into such erroneous beliefs. In this discussion, we will examine the perspectives of the Quran and the narrations regarding Ghulu. By utilizing reliable Islamic sources, we aim to achieve a deeper understanding of this concept. Ghulu in the Quran: The term "Ghulu" appears in two Quranic verses, where it explicitly prohibits excessive claims or beliefs in religion. Allah says: "O People of the Book! Do not exaggerate in your religion, nor utter anything about Allah except the truth. Indeed, the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was only the messenger of Allah and His word."[1] In another verse, Allah states: "Say, 'O People of the Book! Do not exaggerate in your religion beyond the truth, nor follow the desires of a people who went astray before you and led many astray and strayed from the right path.'"[2] These two verses specifically address the Christians who elevated Jesus to a divine status, equating him with God. The Qur'an warns them against this exaggeration, in continuation of verse 171 of Surah An-Nisa, it mentions that saying, "God is three (a reference to the Christian Trinity) is wrong and should be avoided." [3] However, the Quran also condemns other forms of Ghulu, such as exaggeration concerning religious figures[4] or setting equals to God, [5] and strongly condemns such acts. [6] Ghulu in the narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt: The Ahl al-Bayt have also strongly condemned Ghulu in numerous narrations. [7] For example, Imam Ali (AS) states in Nahj al-Balagha: "Two groups have been destroyed because of me: one group of extremists who elevated me to divine status, and another group of extremist enemies who harbored hatred towards me." [8] Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (AS) said: "The least thing that can take a person out of faith is to sit with someone who exaggerates and listen to his words and believe them. My father narrated from his father, and he from his grandfather, that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: 'Two groups from my community will have no share in Islam: the extremists and the Qadariyya.'"[9] Imam Reza (AS) is also reported to have said: "May Allah curse the extremists." He then said, "Do not befriend them or associate with them, and seek refuge in Allah from them. Allah is displeased with them." [10] Conclusion: Based on the Quran and the narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt, it is clear that Ghulu is a serious issue in Islam. It is defined as extremism or exaggeration in religious beliefs and is strongly condemned. By understanding the Quranic verses and the teachings of Ahl al-Bayt, Muslims can avoid the pitfalls of Ghulu and strive for a balanced and moderate faith. [1] . An-Nisā’: 171. «یا أَهْلَ الْکِتابِ لا تَغْلُوا فِی دِینِکُمْ وَ لا تَقُولُوا عَلَی اللهِ إِلَّا الْحَقَّ إِنَّمَا الْمَسِیحُ عِیسَی ابْنُ مَرْیَمَ رَسُولُ اللهِ وَ کَلِمَتُهُ» [2] . Al-Mā'idah: 77. «قُلْ یا أَهْلَ الْکِتابِ لا تَغْلُوا فِی دِینِکُمْ غَیْرَ الْحَقِّ وَ لا تَتَّبِعُوا أَهْواءَ قَوْمٍ قَدْ ضَلُّوا مِنْ قَبْلُ وَ أَضَلُّوا کَثِیراً وَ ضَلُّوا عَنْ سَواءِ السَّبِیلِ» [3] . For further reading, refer to: Ghulū: Haqīqat va Aqsām-e Ān (Ghalu: Facts and Types): Sayyid Kamāl Haidari; Tarjumah-ye Pajāhuškadeh-ye Hajj va Ziyārat. / Ghulū az Didgāh-e Tashayu'(Ghulu from the perspective of Shia): Ali Ansāri Bouyrahmadī, p: 20. [4] . Al-Tawbah: 31 «اتَّخَذُوا أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَ رُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ وَ الْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ وَمَا أُمِرُوا إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُوا إِلَٰهًا وَاحِدًا ۖ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ ۚ سُبْحَانَهُ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ» Al- Tawbah: 30 «وَ قَالَتِ الْيَهُودُ عُزَيْرٌ ابْنُ اللَّهِ وَقَالَتِ النَّصَارَى الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ اللَّهِ ۖ ذَٰلِكَ قَوْلُهُمْ بِأَفْوَاهِهِمْ ۖ يُضَاهِئُونَ قَوْلَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ قَبْلُ ۚ قَاتَلَهُمُ اللَّهُ ۚ أَنَّىٰ يُؤْفَكُونَ» Āl ‘Imrān: 79 «مَا كَانَ لِبَشَرٍ أَنْ يُؤْتِيَهُ اللَّهُ الْكِتَابَ وَ الْحُكْمَ وَالنُّبُوَّةَ ثُمَّ يَقُولَ لِلنَّاسِ كُونُوا عِبَادًا لِي مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ وَلَٰكِنْ كُونُوا رَبَّانِيِّينَ بِمَا كُنْتُمْ تُعَلِّمُونَ الْكِتَابَ وَ بِمَا كُنْتُمْ تَدْرُسُونَ» [5] . Ar-Ra‘d: 16 «أَمْ جَعَلُوا لِلَّهِ شُرَكَاءَ خَلَقُوا كَخَلْقِهِ فَتَشَابَهَ الْخَلْقُ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ قُلِ اللَّهُ خَالِقُ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُوَ الْوَاحِدُ الْقَهَّارُ» [6] . Refer to: Ghulū va Tafvīż dar Gostareh āyāt va Ravāyāt ahl-e Bayt(Exaggeration and delegation in the interpretation of the verses and narrations of the Ahlul Bayt (AS)): Sayyid Alī Reza Mūsavī. [7] . Refer to: Uyun Akhbar Al-Ridha (AS): Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 2, P: 200 (Chapter: What was narrated from Al-Ridha (AS) in the face of the evidence of the Imams (AS) and the response to the extremists and the Mufawwidah, may Allah curse them) / Bihar al-Anwar: Allamah al-Majlisi Vol: 25, P: 261 (Chapter on the denial of exaggeration of the Prophet and the Imams) [8] . Nahjul Balagha: Al-Sharif Al-Murtada, p: 184, Sermon 127. [9] . Al-Khisal: Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 72. [10] . Uyun Akhbar Al-Rida (AS): Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 2, P: 202.

What is Ghulu (Exaggeration) and What Are Its Levels? Ghulu (Exaggeration) is one of the key concepts in Islam, particularly among Shia scholars. Linguistically, it means to exceed a limit or go beyond moderation.[1] In a religious context, Shaykh Mufid defines Ghulu as: “going beyond the bounds and exceeding moderation regarding the status of Prophets and Imams.”[2] Therefore, the Ghulu discussed in jurisprudence and theological books, and those who believe in it are considered infidels and impure, is the belief in things such as someone considering the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and the Imams (AS) as God and the worshipped, or attributing prophethood and prophethood to the Imams (AS), or believing that with the Wilayah and love of the household of prophethood, there is no need for worship and obedience, and abstinence from sins, and similar beliefs that are either Shirk or denial of essentials, which in both cases is infidelity.[3] The infallible Imams (AS) themselves said: Do not say about us what we did not say about ourselves.[4] For example, a person asked Imam Baqir (AS): Who is a Ghali? Imam Baqir (AS) said: They are a group who say things about us that we never said about ourselves.[5] Types of Ghulu (Exaggeration) Different types and levels of Ghulu have been mentioned by Shia scholars. For example, the late Shahid Sadr (RA) categorizes Ghulu into three main levels: 1. Ghulu in the level of divinity: Ghulu in the level of divinity means that an individual about whom Ghulu occurs is interpreted as being God or a partner to God; this partnership can be in two ways: either that individual is considered equal in rank and status to God, or he is placed in one of the levels of divinity; sometimes Ghulu is interpreted as the incarnation of God in something or union with him; these interpretations are considered infidelity, because the first type necessitates the denial of God, the second type denies Tawhid and monotheism, and the third type is the belief in the divinity of a being other than God. 2. Ghulu regarding prophethood: Exaggeration regarding prophethood sometimes means considering the person being exaggerated about as superior to the Prophet or considering him/her a link between God and the Prophet; sometimes it also means the equality of the person being exaggerated about with the Prophet in a way that the Prophet's mission does not include him/her; all these are considered Kufr (disbelief), because it contradicts the meaning of bearing witness to the prophethood of the Prophet of Islam (SAW) for all humanity. 3. Ghulu in attributes and actions that are exclusive to God: Exaggeration in attributes and actions means attributing attributes or actions to a person who is not at that level and is not an example of those attributes; if these attributes or actions, which are exclusive to God, are among the essentials of religion, this exaggeration falls under the title of denying the essentials of religion and is considered Kufr; otherwise, it will not be disbelief.[6] In general, the most important exaggerated beliefs among Shiites can be stated as follows: First: Claiming divinity for the Prophet and Imam. Second: Claiming prophethood for the Imams. Third: Claiming knowledge of the unseen for the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) without divine inspiration and teaching; among the sayings of the exaggerators about the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is the claim that they have knowledge of the unseen independently and without divine inspiration or teaching. Fourth: Belief in the transmigration of the souls of the Imams; those who believe in transmigration deny bodily resurrection and believe that transmigration means the transfer of the rational soul after death from one body to another human body in this world. This group of exaggerators claims that the souls of the Imams transmigrate among themselves. Fifth: Claiming independent delegation; among the sayings of the exaggerators is that God Almighty has delegated the work of servants, such as bringing to life, killing, providing sustenance, forgiveness, prohibition, and the like, to the Prophet (SAW) and the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Also, God Almighty has delegated the task of legislation to the Prophet and the Imams (AS). Therefore, they independently manage the affairs of people, both in the world of creation and in the world of legislation.[7] Several other classifications have also been presented for exaggeration,[8] all of which return to the same matters mentioned. Conclusion: In conclusion, it should be stated that the issue of the Imams' knowledge of the unseen, their constitutive wilayah, their pure and luminous nature, and the miracles and wonders they performed has always been discussed in theological books, and its limits have been defined. The implication of Imam Ali's (AS) hadith, "Beware of exaggeration concerning us. Say that we are servants who are worshipped, and say whatever you wish about our virtues,"[9] or his saying, "Do not surpass our servitude, then say whatever you wish, and you will not reach [the truth],"[10] and Imam Sadiq's (AS) statement, "Consider us created servants and say whatever you wish about us except prophethood,"[11] all indicate that although the position of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is very honorable, and no matter what we say or think about them, we will not reach the essence of their being and exalted position, but we should not raise them above the level of servitude, creation, and being worshipped, and attribute to them qualities that contradict the essentials of religion.[12] [1]. Al-Nihaya fi Gharib al-Hadith wa al-Athar: Majd al-Din ibn al-Athir, vol. 3, p. 382. / Lisan al-Arab: Ibn Manzur, vol. 15, p. 133. [2]. Taṣḥīḥ al-i'tiqād: al-Shaykh al-Mufid/p. 131. For further study, refer to The Role of Ghulu in the Deviation of Beliefs and Thoughts: Muhammad Hilli, pp. 25-28. / Ghulu and Tafwid in the Scope of the Verses and Narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS): Sayyid Alireza Mousavi, pp. 4-11. [3]. Wilayah at-takwiniyyah and Wilayah at-tashri’iyyah: Sheikh Luṭf Allāh Ṣāfī Golpayegānī, p. 41. [4]. Al-Kafi, Islamic Edition: Al-Kulayni, vol. 2, p. 298. "َا تَقُلْ فِينَا مَا لَا نَقُولُ فِي أَنْفُسِنَا فَإِنَّكَ مَوْقُوفٌ وَ مَسْئُولٌ لَا مَحَالَة" [5]. Ibid.: Al-Kulayni, vol. 2, p. 75. [6]. Researches in the Explanation of al-Uruwah al-Wuthqa: Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr, vol. 3, p. 306. [7]. Ghulu: Its Reality and Types: Sayyid Kamal Haydari, translated by the Hajj and Pilgrimage Research Center, pp. 27-42. / The Role of Ghulu in the Deviation of Beliefs and Thoughts: Muhammad Hilli, p. 31. / Ghulu and Tafwid in the Scope of the Verses and Narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS): Sayyid Alireza Mousavi, p. 12. [8]. Similar to the words of the late Sabzwari: Muhadhab al-Ahkam fi Bayan al-Halal wa al-Haram: Sayyid Abd al-Ali al-Sabzwari, vol. 1, p. 382. [9]. Al-Khisal: Al-Saduq, vol. 2, p. 614. [10]. Al-Ihtijaj: Al-Tabarsi, Abu Mansur, vol. 2, p. 438. / Tafsir al-Imam al-Askari: Attributed to Imam al-Askari, vol. 1, p. 50. [11]. Al-Khara'ij wa al-Jara'ih: Al-Rawandi, Qutb al-Din, vol. 2, p. 735. [12]. Farhang Ghadir: Jawad Muhaddith, published by Ma'ruf, Qom, 1387, p. 448

When did exaggeration (ghulu) begin in Islam? Exaggeration, or ghulu, refers to extremism and excessive beliefs in religion, a phenomenon that has persisted throughout human history.[1] Evidence of exaggeration in relation to natural beings, humans, prophets, and angels can be found in religions preceding Islam, as indicated by Quranic reports. [2] In Islamic history, exaggeration is a significant and complex issue that has emerged from the very beginning of Islam, impacting Islamic societies in various ways over time. One of the earliest instances of extreme beliefs occurred during the Prophet Muhammad's lifetime, [3] following the death of his son Ibrahim. Historians report that during Ibrahim’s death, a solar eclipse took place, and some individuals attributed this event to the death of the Prophet’s son. The Prophet confronted and rejected this belief. [4] Even after the death of the Prophet, some Sunni writers have gone so far as to exaggerate the status of the caliphs, considering them superior to the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and claiming that the Prophet (SAW) was merely continuing the path of the caliphs. [5] Exaggeration is clearly addressed in the teachings of the Prophet (SAW) and the Imams (AS), [6] who strongly criticized it in many narrations. For example, Abū Rāfiʿ al-Qurazī and Sayyid Najrānī approached the Prophet (SAW) and said: “O Muhammad! Do you want us to worship you and call you God?” The Prophet responded, “I seek refuge with God! We do not worship anyone but the one God, and we do not command worship of anyone else. I was not sent for such a purpose, nor was I commanded to do so.” [7] The Imams (AS), following the example of the Prophet (SAW), treated exaggerators severely, showing no leniency with them. Here are a few examples from reliable narrations: · A group visited Imam Ali (AS) and said, “You are our Lord, you created us, and you provided for us.” After advising and warning them, Imam Ali (AS) told them to repent and stop such statements. When they refused, he severely punished them. [8] · When Mufaddal asked Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (AS) about the Muqassira and the Murtafīʿa (exaggerators), Imam Ja'far (AS) replied, "The Muqassira are those whom God guided to the virtue of our knowledge and revealed our secrets to them, but they doubted us, denied our grace, and claimed it was not God who gave them knowledge and power. The Murtafīʿa, on the other hand, are those who, out of love and loyalty to us, have attributed to the Imams ranks that hold no truth. They are not from us, and we are not from them, nor are their leaders from us. These individuals will face punishment similar to that of the rebellious nations." [9] · Abū Hāshim al-Ja'farī said, "I asked Imam al-Ridā (AS) about the exaggerators and the Mufawwiḍah. He said: 'Exaggerators are disbelievers, and the Mufawwiḍah are polytheists. Associating with them, trusting them, drinking with them, interacting with them, marrying them, sheltering them, trusting them, supporting and assisting them, even by the slightest amount, leads to apostasy from the authority of God, His Messenger, and the authority of us, the Ahlul Bayt.'"[10] · In another narration from Imam al-Ridā (AS), when people asked him about a rumor saying that he claimed people were slaves to the Ahlul Bayt, he responded, “O God, You are the Creator of the heavens and the earth and know the unseen and the seen! You are a witness that I have never said such a thing, and none of my ancestors have ever said it either. These accusations are also part of the oppression these people have inflicted on us." [11] There are many other narrations on this topic. For further study, you can refer to the books written on this subject. [12] Based on the points discussed, it is clear that exaggeration (ghulu) has existed in Islam from its early days and has gradually caused many divisions and challenges within the Muslim community. Exaggeration has been strongly condemned in both the Quran and the narrations of the Ahlul Bayt (AS). This highlights the importance of moderation in religion and avoiding excessiveness to preserve the integrity of Islamic beliefs. [1] . Ghulu (An Introduction to the Thoughts and Beliefs of the Ghalians in Religion): Salehi Najafabadi, p. 19. / Ghulu from the Shiite Perspective: Ali Ansari Boyer Ahmadi, p. 20. [2] . Ghulu (An Exploration of Currents and Outcomes): Safari Furoshani, p. 31-33. [3] . Ghulu (An Introduction to the Thoughts and Beliefs of the Ghalians in Religion): Salehi Najafabadi, p. 64. [4] . Ansab al-Ashraf: Balazari, 1417 AH, vol. 1, p. 452; / Bihar al-Anwar: Majlesi, 1403 AH, vol. 79, p. 91. [5] . Al-Ghadir: Allama Al-Amini Vol: 8 Page: 49. / Ghulu from the Shiite Perspective: Ali Ansari Boyer Ahmadi, p. 24. [6] . Al-Kafi: Al-Sheikh Al-Kulayni, vol. 4, p. 153. [7] . Bihar Al-Anwar: vol. 25, p. 262. [8] . Ibid.: Al-Allama Al-Majlesi, vol. 25, p. 299. [9] . Al-Hidayah Al-Kubra: Husayn bin Hamdan Al-Khasibi, p. 431. [10] . Bihar Al-Anwar: Al-Allama Al-Majlesi, vol. 25, p. 273. [11] . Ayoun Akhbar Al-Rida: Al-Sheikh Al-Saduq, vol. 1, p. 197. [12] . Ghulu (An Introduction to the Thoughts and Beliefs of the Ghalians in Religion😞 Salehi Najafabadi. / Ghulu from the Shiite Perspective: Ali Ansari Boyer Ahmadi.

Does the narration 'Fatimah is a part of me' refer to the claim that Ali (AS) proposed marriage to the daughter of Abu Jahl? The narration 'Fatimah is a part of me' signifies that Fatimah Zahra (SA) is an inseparable part of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and is one of the most well-known hadiths about her status. This hadith is widely accepted and transmitted by all Islamic schools of thought.[1] Shia scholars, such as prominent figures like Shaykh Mufid, [2] Shaykh Tusi, [3] and Shaykh Saduq, [4] have transmitted this narration in their works, highlighting its significance and authenticity within the Shia tradition. This hadith has been narrated in various forms in both Sunni sources. However, in some Sunni sources like Sahih al-Bukhari, it is stated that Ali (AS), while married to Fatimah Zahra (SA), also proposed marriage to the daughter of Abu Jahl. When the Prophet (SAW) became aware of this, he declared from the pulpit: 'Fatimah is a part of me, and I dislike anyone harming her. By Allah, the daughter of the enemy of God shall not dwell in the same house as the daughter of the Prophet of God.'[5] Due to its contradiction with the noble character of Ali (AS) and his deep love for Fatimah (SA), this particular Sunni version has been criticized and examined by Shia scholars. Reasons for Rejecting this Narration: 1. Contradiction with Imam Ali’s Character: This narration contradicts the elevated character of Imam Ali (AS) and his loyalty to Lady Fatimah (SA). Imam Ali himself explicitly stated that he never caused any distress to Fatimah al-Zahra. “By Allah, I never made Fatimah angry or displeased until she left this world. Whenever I felt sorrowful, I would look at Fatimah’s face to alleviate my grief.” [6] 2. Weak chain of narration: The chain of transmission (isnad) for this narration has multiple weaknesses, and many scholars consider it unreliable. [7] When analyzing the narrative, we find elements that highlight the weaknesses and fragility of the story, such as: ᴏ Historical inconsistency: The only narrator who mentioned the marriage proposal incident is “Al-Miswar ibn Makhrama.” However, his timeline does not align with the event. Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani states that Al-Miswar was born two years after the Hijra, and he arrived in Medina in the eighth year after the conquest of Mecca. Thus, he could not have witnessed the event he narrated. [8] ᴏ Biased Narrator: Another point is Al-Miswar's enmity towards the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). The Khawarij had a good relationship with him and considered him one of their own. [9] He was a supporter of Mu'awiyah to the extent that whenever he heard Mu'awiyah's name, he would send blessings upon him. [10] This behavior indicates that his purpose in narrating this hadith was to tarnish the character of Imam Ali (AS). ᴏ The historical impossibility of the event: Juwayriya, the daughter of Abu Jahl, had not converted to Islam before the conquest of Mecca, and after embracing Islam, she married ʿAttāb ibn Asīd ibn Abī al-ʿĪṣ ibn Umayya. [11] 3. Attempt to tarnish the Ahl al-Bayt (AS): This narration was likely fabricated to defame the character of Imam Ali (AS); As Imam Sadiq (AS) indicated the story of Imam Ali (AS) proposing to Abu Jahl's daughter was fabricated by his opponents. "'Alqama, you cannot please everyone and silence every tongue. How can you remain safe from something that even prophets and saints were not safe from? Didn't they say about the Messenger of Allah (SAW) that he was a seeker of worldly gains and power? Didn't they attribute to Ali (AS) the desire to marry the daughter of Abu Jahl while he was already married to Fatimah (SA)?" [12] 4. The existence of this narration without mentioning the act of proposing marriage: This narration exists in Sunni sources without mentioning the event of Imam Ali (AS) proposing to the daughter of Abu Jahl, [13] which is similar to how Shia sources narrate this story. This itself is evidence that the event of the proposal is a fabricated story created to defame Imam Ali (AS) and diminish the significance of Fatimah's (SA) distress over Abu Bakr and Umar. [14] Conclusion: The narration "Fatimah is a part of me" is unrelated to the story of Ali's proposal to the daughter of Abu Jahl. Many scholars reject the account of this proposal due to its weak chain of transmission and its contradiction with Ali’s character. This event appears to have been fabricated to damage Imam Ali's (AS) reputation and to undermine the seriousness of Fatimah's (SA) grievances against Abu Bakr and Umar. [1] . Majmu’at al-Rasa’il: Al-Safi, Sheikh Lutfullah, Vol: 2 P: 312. [2] . Al-Amali: Sheikh Al-Mufid, Vol: 1, P: 259. «قَالَ سَمِعْتُ سَعْدَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ يَعْنِي ابْنَ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ص يَقُولُ‌ فَاطِمَةُ بَضْعَةٌ مِنِّي مَنْ سَرَّهَا فَقَدْ سَرَّنِي وَ مَنْ سَاءَهَا فَقَدْ سَاءَنِي فَاطِمَةُ أَعَزُّ الْبَرِيَّةِ عَلَيَّ.» [3] . Al-Amali - Dar Al-Thaqafah Edition: Sheikh Al-Tusi, Vol: 1, P: 24. [4] . Ilal Al-Shara'i': Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 185 and 186. [5] . Sahih Al-Bukhari: Al-Bukhari, Vol: 5, P: 22. [6] . Kashf Al-Ghummah fi Ma'rifat Al-A'immah: Al-Muhaddith Al-Irbili, Vol: 1, P: 352. «فَوَ اللَّهِ مَا اَغْضَبْتُهَا وَ لَا اَکْرَهْتُهَا عَلَی اَمْرٍ حَتَّی قَبَضَهَا اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ وَ لَا اَغْضَبَتْنِی وَ لَا عَصَتْ لِی اَمْراً وَ لَقَدْ کُنْتُ اَنْظُرُ اِلَیْهَا فَتَنْکَشِفُ عَنِّی الْهُمُومُ وَ الْاَحْزَان.» [7] . For more information, please refer to the article: The Legend of the Proposal of the Daughter of Abu Jahl by the Commander of the Faithful (AS). [8] . Al-Isabah fi Tamyiz Al-Sahaba: Al-Asqalani, Ibn Hajar, Vol: 6, P: 94. [9] . Si’ar A’lam al-Nubala: Al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din, Vol: 4, P: 414. «قَالَ الزُّبَيْرُ بنُ بَكَّارٍ: كانت تَغْشَاهُ، وَيَنْتَحِلُوْنَهُ» [10] . History of Islam - Tadmuri edition: Al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din, Vol: 5, P: 246 «قَالَ عُرْوَةُ: فَلَمْ أَسْمَعِ الْمِسْوَرَ ذَكَرَ مُعَاوِيَةَ إِلا صَلَّى عَلَيْهِ». [11] . Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra: Ibn Saad, Vol: 8, P: 262. [12] . Amali: Sheikh al-Saduq, P: 165. «فَقَالَ علیه السلام: یَا عَلْقَمَةُ اِنَّ رِضَا النَّاسِ لَا یُمْلَکُ وَاَلْسِنَتَهُمْ لَا تُضْبَطُ وَکَیْفَ تَسْلَمُونَ مِمَّا لَمْ یَسْلَمْ مِنْهُ اَنْبِیَاءُ اللَّهِ وَرُسُلُهُ وَحُجَجُ اللَّهِ (علیهم‌السّلام).... اَ لَمْ یَنْسُبُوا سَیِّدَ الْاَوْصِیَاءِ (علیهم‌السّلام) اِلَی اَنَّهُ کَانَ یَطْلُبُ الدُّنْیَا وَالْمُلْکَ ...... اَ لَمْ یَنْسُبُوهُ اِلَی اَنَّهُ (علیه‌السّلام) اَرَادَ اَنْ یَتَزَوَّجَ ابْنَةَ اَبِی جَهْلٍ عَلَی فَاطِمَةَ (علیهاالسّلام) وَاَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ (صلی‌الله‌علیه‌و‌آله‌وسلّم) شَکَاهُ عَلَی الْمِنْبَرِ اِلَی الْمُسْلِمِینَ فَقَالَ اِنَّ عَلِیّاً یُرِیدُ اَنْ یَتَزَوَّجَ ابْنَةَ عَدُوِّ اللَّهِ عَلَی ابْنَةِ نَبِیِّ اللَّهِ اَلَا اِنَّ فَاطِمَةَ بَضْعَةٌ مِنِّی فَمَنْ آذَاهَا فَقَدْ آذَانِی وَمَنْ سَرَّهَا فَقَدْ سَرَّنِی وَمَنْ غَاظَهَا فَقَدْ غَاظَنِی.» [13] . Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: Ibn Abi Shaybah, Abu Bakr, Vol: 6, P: 38. [14] . Al-Imamah wal-Siyasah: Al-Dinawari, Ibn Qutaybah, Vol: 1, P: 31 / Sahih al-Bukhari: Al-Bukhari, Vol: 4, P: 79.

Did houses in Medina have doors during Rasulullah's time? In response to this question, it should be noted that houses typically had doors in the centuries and eras preceding the Prophet (SAW). This fact is evident not only in historical texts but also clearly mentioned in the Quran. For example, in the story of Prophet Joseph (Yusuf) and Zuleikha, the Quran indicates that Zuleikha closed the doors to conceal her intentions. [1] This demonstrates the existence of doors during that time. Quranic Evidence: During the time of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), houses in Medina did have fences and doors. The Quran mentions that if you have access to the keys of a house, you are allowed to take food from it. [2] Numerous narrations: Narrations that prove the existence of doors for people's houses during the time of the Prophet (SAW): For example, Sijistani narrated that the Prophet (SAW) instructed Umar to "Go and bring food for these people." The narrator recounts that Umar took them to a room, retrieved a key from his belt, and opened the door. [3] Additionally, in his book "Sahih Muslim," Muslim reported that the Prophet (SAW) commanded us to close the doors of our houses at night. [4] Narrations that prove the existence of a door for the house of the Prophet (SAW): Ibn Kathir al-Dimashqi writes: The rooms of the Prophet’s house were woven from ar’ar branches and wood with hair, and he cites from the history of Bukhari: The door of the Prophet's house had no doorknobs, and people would knock with their fingers or nails. [5] Bukhari also mentions in "Al-Adab al-Mufrad" that Muhammad ibn Hilal observed the houses of the Prophet's wives. He noted that their coverings were woven from hair. When I asked him about Aisha's house, he said, "The door of her house opened toward Damascus." I inquired whether it had one leaf or two. He replied that it had only one leaf, and when I asked about its material, he said it was made from the wood of the ar'ar tree or the sāj tree. [6] Imam Kazem (AS) narrates that on the night the Prophet passed away, he called Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husayn (AS) together, closed the door, and had a lengthy conversation with Fatimah. When it became quite late, Ali and his two sons came out of the house, waiting behind the door with the people. [7] In another narration, Imam Kazem (AS) reports that the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) gathered Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husayn (AS), closed the door behind them, and said: “O my family, those nearest to Allah! May the Lord send peace upon you…”[8] Narrations that prove the existence of a door for the house of Ali and Fatimah (AS): In the story of the marriage of Fatimah Zahra and the Commander of the Faithful (AS), it is mentioned that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) called Ali (AS) and performed the same act that he had done with Fatimah. Then he recited the same supplication for Ali that he had recited for Fatimah (SA). Then he said to Ali and Fatimah (AS): Get up and go to your house, may Allah make you kind to each other! And bless your offspring! And grant you a good end! The Messenger of Allah (SAW) got up after these supplications and closed the door of the house. [9] Muhammad ibn Jarir Tabari, a Shia scholar, also writes: Salman says, ‘I went to Fatimah’s house, knocked on the door, and obtained permission to enter. She allowed me to come in. When I entered, I saw her sitting.’ [10] Furthermore, in narrations that describe the incident of the attack on the house of Ali and Fatimah (AS), it is mentioned: ‘Umar said, ‘Let us go to her.’ Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn Walid, Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfah), Qunfudh, and I set out with them. When we reached the door, Fatimah saw them and closed the door in their faces. She had no doubt that they would not enter without her permission. However, Umar struck the door with his foot, breaking it. The door was made of palm.’ [11] Additionally, in another narration by Ibn Qutaybah, it is stated: 'Umar and a group with him arrived at Fatimah’s house. They knocked on the door, and when Fatimah heard their voices, she cried out: ‘O my father, O Messenger of Allah! After you, What injustices we have seen from Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafah!’[12] In conclusion, based on historical evidence and reliable narrations, it can be inferred that not only were the houses in Medina equipped with doors, but the houses of the Prophet (SAW) and Imam Ali and Lady Fatimah (AS) also had doors. [1] . Al-Yusuf: 23. (وَغَلَّقَتِ الْأَبْوَابَ) [2] . An-Nur: 61. (أَوْ مَا مَلَكْتُمْ مَفَاتِحَهُ) [3] . Sunan Abi Dawood: Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawood, Vol. 4, p. 360. [4] . Sahih Muslim: Muslim, Vol. 3, p. 1593. [5] . Al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya: Ibn Kathir, Vol. 3, p. 268. [6] . Al-Adab al-Mufrad with Annotations: Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, p. 416. Similar narrations are also mentioned: Samt al-Nujum al-Awali fi Anba’ al-Awail wal-Tawali: Al-Asami, Vol. 1, p. 367 / Tarikh Makkah al-Musharrafah wal-Masjid al-Haram wal-Madinah al-Sharifah wal-Qabr al-Sharif: Ibn al-Dhia, Vol. 1, p. 268. [7] . Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 22, p. 490. [8] . Ibid: Vol. 24, p. 219. [9] . Musannaf Abd al-Razzaq al-San’ani: Al-San’ani, Abd al-Razzaq, Vol. 5, p. 486 / Al-Mu’jam al-Kabeer: Al-Tabarani, Vol. 24, p. 132 / Sharh al-Akhbar fi Fada’il al-A’imma al-Athar: Al-Qadi al-Nu’man al-Maghribi, Vol. 2, p. 359 / Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 43, p. 122. [10] . Dalail al-Imamah: Al-Tabari al-Saghir, Muhammad ibn Jarir, Vol. 1, p. 107. [11] . Tafsir al-Ayyashi: Al-Ayyashi, Muhammad ibn Mas’ud, Vol. 2, p. 66 / Al-Ikhtisas: Al-Shaykh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 186 / Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 28, p. 227. [12] . Al-Imamah wal-Siyasah: Al-Dinawari, Ibn Qutaybah, Vol. 1, p. 30.

Is there any evidence in Shia sources regarding the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA)? There is authentic evidence in Shia sources regarding the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA) and her martyrdom, emphasizing the significant injustice she faced. For example, consider the following accounts: 1. Statement by Sulaym bin Qays (d. 76 AH) quoting Salman al-Farsi: "Fatimah (SA) said: 'O Umar, what is this between you and us?' He replied: ‘Open the door, or else we will set your house on fire!’ She responded, ‘O Omar, are you not afraid of Allah that you enter my house without permission?’ But Umar refused to turn back. Umar called for fire, ignited it at the door, then pushed it open and entered. Lady Fatimah confronted him, crying, ‘O father, O Messenger of Allah!’ Umar raised his sword, which was in its sheath, and struck Fatimah’s side. she cried out: 'O my father!' He then raised a whip and struck her arm. Lady Fatimah exclaimed, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what ill-treatment Abu Bakr and Omar, your companions, have shown us!’”.[1] 2. Statement by Muhammad bin Jarir bin Rustam Tabari (d. 310 AH): “The cause of Lady Fatimah’s death was the blows inflicted upon her. Qunfudh, Omar’s servant, struck her with the sheathed sword upon Omar’s command. As a result, her son Mohsen was miscarried, and she fell seriously ill. She did not allow any of her oppressors to visit her.” [2] He shared this story in another part of his book as well. [3] 3. Statement by Muhammad bin Mas’ud 'Ayyashi (d. 320 AH): "Umar said: 'Come with me to him.' So, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn al-Walid, al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim, (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfa), and Qunfuz, and I (the narrator) went together. When we approached Lady Fatimah’s house, she saw them and closed the door, as she did not doubt that they would not enter without her permission. Umar struck the door with his foot and broke it, as it was made of palm fronds. They entered and brought out Ali (AS)..." [4] 4. Statement by Sheikh al-Kulayni (d. 329 AH): Kulayni narrates a narration in Al-Kafi from Imam Kazim (AS) referring to Lady Fatimah (SA) as a martyr: “Indeed, Fatimah (SA) is truthful and a martyr…”[5] 5. Statement by Husayn ibn Hamdan Khasibi (d. 346 AH): From Lady Fatimah’s own words, Khasibi recounts the following incident: “Then they sent Qunfuz and Khalid ibn al-Walid to our house to bring out my cousin to the Saqifah of Bani Sa'ida for their harmful allegiance. And he would not go out to them, being occupied with the will of the Messenger of Allah (SAW)... So they gathered wood at our door and brought fire to burn the house. I held onto the doorpost and said, 'I beseech you by Allah and by my father, the Messenger of Allah (SAW), to cease and desist.' Then Umar took the whip from Qunfuz, the freed slave of Abu Bakr, and struck my arm with it, so that the whip twisted around my hand until it was like a bracelet. And he kicked the door with his foot and it struck me, and I fell on my face while I was pregnant, and the fire was blazing..." [6] 6. Statement by Muhammad ibn Qulawayh (d. 368 AH): Gabriel addressed the Prophet, saying: ‘"And as for your daughter, she will be wronged and deprived, and her rights which you have appointed for her will be taken from her by force. She will be beaten while she is pregnant, and people will enter her private house without permission. Then she will be treated with contempt and humiliation, and she will find no one to protect her. As a result of the beating, she will miscarry and die from it." [7] 7. Statement by Sheikh Saduq (d. 381 AH): The Messenger of Allah spoke about the events after his passing, saying: When I saw her, I remembered what would happen to her after my demise. It was as if I could see humiliation entering her house, her sanctity being violated, her rights being usurped, her inheritance denied, her side being broken and her unborn child miscarried. She would cry out, ‘O Muhammad!’ But no one would answer her call for help. She would seek assistance, but no one would come to her aid...... She would be the first from my household to join me, appearing before me as a grieving, oppressed, sorrowful, and martyred. At that moment, I would say, ‘O Allah, curse those who wronged her, punish those who seized her rights, humiliate those who oppressed her, and eternally condemn those who struck her side until she lost her child.’ And the angels would respond, ‘Ameen.’ [8] 8. Statement by Sheikh Mufid (d. 413 AH): "Umar said: 'Get up and go to Ali.' So, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn al-Walid, al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim, (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfa), and Qunfuz, and I (the narrator) went together. Lady Fatimah suspected that they would not enter the house without permission. So, she closed and locked the door. When they reached the door, Umar struck the door with his foot and broke it, as it was made of palm. They entered and forcibly dragged Ali out, and Lady Fatimah followed." [9] This incident is also mentioned elsewhere. [10] 9. Statement by Muqatil ibn Atiyya (d. 505 AH): "After Abu Bakr had forcefully taken the allegiance of the people through intimidation, the sword, threats, and coercion, he sent Umar, Qunfuz, Khalid ibn al-Walid, Abu Ubaidah al-Jarrah, and a group of hypocrites to the house of Ali and Fatimah. Umar gathered firewood at the door of Fatimah's house and set it on fire. When Fatimah came to the door to repel Umar and his companions, Umar squeezed Fatimah between the wall and the door with such force that she miscarried her child and the nail of the door pierced her chest. Fatimah cried out, 'O my father, O Messenger of Allah! Look what we have suffered after you from the son of Khattab and the son of Abu Quhafa!' Umar turned to those around him and said, 'Strike Fatimah!' So, they rained blows upon the beloved of the Messenger of Allah and his daughter until they bruised her body." [11] 10. Statement by Abu Mansur Tabarsi (d. 6th century AH): Tabarsi recounts the dialogue between Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (AS) and Mughira (may Allah curse him), where the martyrdom of Lady Fatimah (SA) is explicitly mentioned: “You are the one who beat and injured Fatimah (SA) until she miscarried her child. Your actions were due to your opposition to the Messenger of Allah (SAW), your defiance of his command, and your violation of his sanctity.” [12] 11. Statement by Allama Hilli (d. 726 AH): And among these [events] is that he and Umar sought to burn the house of the Commander of the Faithful, in which were the Commander of the Faithful, Fatimah, their children, and a group of the Banu Hashim, who had not pledged allegiance to Abu Bakr and had opposed it. Tabari mentioned in his history, saying: 'Umar ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Ali and said, "By Allah, I will surely burn you all or you will come out to pledge allegiance." [13] 12. Statement by Allama Majlisi (d. 1110 AH): “When the rulers seized power and usurped the caliphate, most people pledged allegiance to them. They sent someone to Ali (AS) to force him into allegiance. He refused, so Umar sent fire to burn down their house. They intended to enter by force, but Fatimah blocked the door. Qunfuz, a slave of Umar, struck the door on Fatimah's abdomen, breaking her side and causing her to miscarry the child whom the Messenger of Allah (SAW) had named Muhsen. As a result, she fell ill and died." [14] This incident is also mentioned in Bihar al-Anwar. [15] Conclusion: Based on numerous and reliable Shia sources, the incident of the attack on the house of Lady Fatima (SA) is well-established and historically verified among Shia Muslims. Sayyid Murtadha (d. 436 AH) affirms that there is a significant abundance of narration chains regarding the martyrdom of Lady Zahra (SA). [16] Sheikh Tusi (d. 460 AH) also considers the attack on Lady Fatima Zahra's (SA) house to be well-known and states that there is no disagreement among Shia scholars on this matter. [17] Furthermore, Allama Majlesi (d. 1110 AH) regards the reports of the attack on the house and the martyrdom of Lady Fatima (SA) as widely accepted. [18] [1]. Kitab Sulaym ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Sulaym bin Qais, p. 150. «فقالت فاطمة عليها السلام : يا عمر ، ما لنا ولك ؟ فقال : افتحي الباب وإلا أحرقنا عليكم بيتكم . فقالت : يا عمر ، أما تتقي الله تدخل علي بيتي ؟ فأبي أن ينصرف . ودعا عمر بالنار فأضرمها في الباب ثم دفعه فدخل فاستقبلته فاطمة عليها السلام وصاحت: يا أبتاه يا رسول الله فرفع عمر السيف وهو في غمده فوجأ به جنبها فصرخت: يا أبتاه. فرفع السوط فضرب به ذراعها فنادت: يا رسول الله، لبئس ما خلفك أبو بكر وعمر.» [2]. Dalail al-Imamah: Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn Rustam Tabari, p. 134. «وَ كَانَ سَبَبُ وَفَاتِهَا أَنَّ قُنْفُذاً مَوْلَى عُمَرَ لَكَزَهَا بِنَعْلِ السَّيْفِ‏ بِأَمْرِهِ، فَأَسْقَطَتْ مُحَسِّناً وَ مَرِضَتْ مِنْ ذَلِكَ مَرَضاً شَدِيداً، وَ لَمْ تَدَعْ أَحَداً مِمَّنْ آذَاهَا يَدْخُلُ عَلَيْهَا.» Allama Mamaqani, one of the great scholars of Rijal, considers the chain of transmission of this narration to be authentic and strong in his book "Mara'a al-Kamal". Mara'a al-Kamal: Allama Mamqani, Abdullah, vol. 3, p. 267. [3]. Dalail al-Imamah: Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn Rustam Tabari, p. 104. [4]. Tafsir al-'Ayyashi: al-'Ayyashi, Muhammad ibn Mas’ud, Vol. 2, p. 66. «قال عمر: قوموا بنا إليه، فقام أبو بكر، و عمر، و عثمان و خالد بن الوليد و المغيرة بن شعبة، و أبو عبيدة بن الجراح، و سالم مولى أبي حذيفة، و قنفذ، و قمت معهم، فلما انتهينا إلى الباب- فرأتهم فاطمة ص أغلقت الباب في وجوههم، و هي لا تشك أن لا يدخل عليها إلا بإذنها، فضرب عمر الباب برجله فكسره و كان من سعف‌ ثم دخلوا فأخرجوا عليا ع ملببا......» [5]. Al-Kafi: al-Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub, Vol. 1, p. 458. [6]. Al-Hidayah al-Kubra: al-Khasibi, Husayn ibn Hamdan, Vol. 1, p. 178. «ثُمَّ يُنْفِذُونَ إِلَى دَارِنَا قُنْفُذاً وَ مَعَهُ خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ لِيُخْرِجَا ابْنَ عَمِّي إِلَى سَقِيفَةِ بَنِي سَاعِدَةَ لِبَيْعَتِهِمُ الْخَاسِرَةِ وَ لَا يَخْرُجُ إِلَيْهِمْ مُتَشَاغِلًا بِوَصَاةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَ آلِهِ).... فَجَمَعُوا الْحَطَبَ بِبَابِنَا وَ أَتَوْا بِالنَّارِ لِيُحْرِقُوا الْبَيْتَ فَأَخَذْتُ بِعِضَادَتَيِ الْبَابِ وَ قُلْتُ: نَاشَدْتُكُمُ اللَّهَ وَ بِأَبِي رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (عليه السلام) أَنْ تَكُفُّوا عَنَّا وَ تَنْصَرِفُوا فَأَخَذَ عُمَرُ السَّوْطَ مِنْ قُنْفُذٍ مَوْلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ، فَضَرَبَ بِهِ عَضُدِي فَالْتَوَى السَّوْطُ عَلَى يَدِي حَتَّى صَارَ كَالدُّمْلُجِ، وَ رَكَلَ الْبَابَ بِرِجْلِهِ فَرَدَّهُ عَلَيَّ وَ أَنَا حَامِلٌ فَسَقَطْتُ لِوَجْهِي وَ النَّارُ تَسَعَّرُ...» [7]. Kamil al-Ziyarat: Ibn Qulawayh, Ja’far ibn Muhammad, pp. 332. «وَ أَمَّا ابْنَتُكَ فَتُظْلَمُ وَ تُحْرَمُ وَ يُؤْخَذُ حَقُّهَا غَصْباً الَّذِي تَجْعَلُهُ لَهَا وَ تُضْرَبُ وَ هِيَ حَامِلٌ وَ يُدْخَلُ عَلَيْهَا وَ عَلَى حَرِيمِهَا وَ مَنْزِلِهَا بِغَيْرِ إِذْنٍ ثُمَّ يَمَسُّهَا هَوَانٌ وَ ذُلٌّ ثُمَّ لَا تَجِدُ مَانِعاً وَ تَطْرَحُ مَا فِي بَطْنِهَا مِنَ الضَّرْبِ وَ تَمُوتُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ الضَّرْبِ » [8]. Al-Amali Saduq: Ibn Babawayh, Muhammad ibn 'Ali, p. 176. «وَ أَنِّي لَمَّا رَأَيْتُهَا ذَكَرْتُ مَا يُصْنَعُ بِهَا بَعْدِي كَأَنِّي بِهَا وَ قَدْ دَخَلَ الذُّلُّ بَيْتَهَا وَ انْتُهِكَتْ حُرْمَتُهَا وَ غُصِبَتْ حَقَّهَا وَ مُنِعَتْ‏ إِرْثَهَا وَ كُسِرَ جَنْبُهَا [وَ كُسِرَتْ جَنْبَتُهَا] وَ أَسْقَطَتْ جَنِينَهَا وَ هِيَ تُنَادِي يَا مُحَمَّدَاهْ فَلَا تُجَابُ وَ تَسْتَغِيثُ فَلَا تُغَاثُ فَلَا تَزَالُ بَعْدِي مَحْزُونَةً مَكْرُوبَةً بَاكِيَةً … فَتَكُونُ أَوَّلَ مَنْ يَلْحَقُنِي مِنْ أَهْلِ بَيْتِي فَتَقْدَمُ عَلَيَّ مَحْزُونَةً مَكْرُوبَةً مَغْمُومَةً مَغْصُوبَةً مَقْتُولَةً فَأَقُولُ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ اللَّهُمَّ الْعَنْ مَنْ ظَلَمَهَا وَ عَاقِبْ مَنْ غَصَبَهَا وَ ذَلِّلْ مَنْ أَذَلَّهَا وَ خَلِّدْ فِي نَارِكَ مَنْ ضَرَبَ جَنْبَهَا حَتَّى أَلْقَتْ وَلَدَهَا فَتَقُولُ الْمَلَائِكَةُ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ آمِينَ.» [9]. Al-Ikhtisas: Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 186. «فَقَالَ عُمَرُ قُمْ إِلَى الرَّجُلِ فَقَامَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ وَ عُمَرُ وَ عُثْمَانُ وَ خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ وَ الْمُغِيرَةُ بْنُ شُعْبَةَ وَ أَبُو عُبَيْدَةَ بْنُ الْجَرَّاحِ وَ سَالِمٌ مَوْلَى أَبِي حُذَيْفَةَ وَ قُمْتُ مَعَهُمْ وَ ظَنَّتْ فَاطِمَةُ ع أَنَّهُ لَا تُدْخَلُ بَيْتُهَا إِلَّا بِإِذْنِهَا فَأَجَافَتِ الْبَابَ‌ وَ أَغْلَقَتْهُ فَلَمَّا انْتَهَوْا إِلَى الْبَابِ ضَرَبَ عُمَرُ الْبَابَ بِرِجْلِهِ فَكَسَرَهُ وَ كَانَ مِنْ سَعَفٍ فَدَخَلُوا عَلَى عَلِيٍّ ع وَ أَخْرَجُوهُ مُلَبَّبَاً فَخَرَجَتْ فَاطِمَةُ» [10]. Al-Muqni’ah: Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 459. [11]. Mutamar Ulama' Baghdad: Muqatil bin Atiyah, Vol: 1, P: 50. «ان ابابكر بعد ما اخذ البيعة لنفسه من الناس بالارحاب و السيف و التهديد و القوة أرسل عمر و قنفذاً و خالد بن الوليد و أبا عبيدة الجراح و جماعة اخرى - من المنافقين - إلى دار علي و فاطمة و جمع عمر الحطب على باب بيت فاطمة و أحرق الباب بالنار، و لما جاءت فاطمة خلف الباب لتردّ عمر و حزبه، عَصَر عمر فاطمة بين الحائط و الباب عصرة شديدة قاسية حتى أسقطت جنينها و أنبت مسمار الباب في صدرها و صاحت فاطمة: أبتاه يا رسول الله! أنظر ماذا لقينا بعدك من ابن الخطاب و ابن أبي قحافة! فالتفت عمر إلى من حوله و قال: اضربوا فاطمة، فانهالت السياط على حبيبة رسول الله و بضعته حتى أدموا جسمها!» [12]. Al-Ihtijaj: Abu Mansur Al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 278. «وَ أَنْتَ الَّذِي ضَرَبْتَ فَاطِمَةَ بِنْتَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ص حَتَّى أَدْمَيْتَهَا وَ أَلْقَتْ مَا فِي بَطْنِهَا اسْتِذْلَالًا مِنْكَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ ص وَ مُخَالَفَةً مِنْكَ لِأَمْرِهِ وَ انْتِهَاكاً لِحُرْمَتِهِ.» [13]. Nahj al-Haqq wa Kashf al-Siddiq: al-Hilli, Vol. 1, p. 271. «و منها أنه طلب هو و عمر إحراق بيت أمير المؤمنين ع و فيه أمير المؤمنين ع و فاطمة و ابناهما و جماعة من بني هاشم لأجل ترك مبايعة أبي بكر. ذَكَرَ الطَّبَرِيُّ فِي تَارِيخِهِ‌ قَالَ: أَتَى عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ مَنْزِلَ عَلِيٍّ فَقَالَ وَ اللَّهِ لَأُحْرِقَنَّ عَلَيْكُمْ أَوْ لَتَخْرُجَنَّ لِلْبَيْعَةِ.» [14]. Mirat al-'Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Aal al-Rasul: al-Majlisi, Vol. 5, p. 318. «أنهم لما غصبوا الخلافة و بايعهم أكثر الناس بعثوا إلى أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام ليحضر للبيعة، فأبى فبعث عمر بنار ليحرق على أهل البيت بيتهم و أرادوا الدخول عليه قهرا، فمنعتهم فاطمة عند الباب فضرب قنفذ غلام عمر الباب على بطن فاطمة عليها السلام فكسر جنبيها و أسقطت لذلك جنينا كان سماه رسول الله صلى الله عليه و آله محسنا، فمرضت لذلك و توفيت صلوات الله عليها في ذلك المرض.» [15]. Bihar al-Anwar: al-Majlisi, Vol. 82, p. 264. [16]. Al-Shafi fi al-Imamah: Sharif Murtada, Vol. 3, p. 241. [17]. Talakhis al-Shafi: Sheikh Tusi, Vol. 3, p. 156. [18]. Mirat al-'Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Aal al-Rasul: al-Majlisi, Vol. 5, p. 318.

Is there any evidence in Sunni sources regarding an attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA)? regarding the events related to the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA) in Sunni narrations, there are two main categories of accounts concerning this incident: First Category (Majority of Sunni Narrations): Musa ibn Uqba describes a conflict between the supporters of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and the pro-caliphate faction. They had surrounded Lady Fatimah's house to force Ali (AS) to pledge allegiance. The narration states: "Umar ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Fatimah along with a group of Muhajireen and Ansar, including Asid ibn Hudayr, Salama ibn Salaama, and Thabit ibn Qays. They confronted Imam Ali (AS) and Lady Fatimah (SA), and one of them even took Zubeir's sword and broke it."[1] Ibn Abi Shaybah also reports that Umar threatened to burn down Lady Fatimah’s house. He said: “O daughter of the Messenger of Allah, by Allah, no one is dearer to us than your father, and no one is dearer to us after your father than you. But by Allah, if these people gather around you, I will order them to burn down your house.”[2] Additionally, Al-Baladhuri recounts an incident where Umar forcefully entered Lady Fatimah’s house. She confronted him at the door, saying: “O son of al-Khattab, do you intend to burn my house?” Umar replied: “Yes, and this is stronger than what your father brought.”[3] Tabari also reports that Umar came to Ali’s house, where Talha, Zubeir, and some of the Muhajireen were. Umar declared: “By Allah, I will either burn down your house or force you to come out for the pledge of allegiance.” [4] Other scholars, such as Ibn Abd Rabbih,[5] Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti,[6] and Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi,[7] have also documented similar accounts. These narrations mention the attack on Lady Fatimah's house and her threat to set it on fire. However, they do not explicitly describe any action to respond to this threat. Some even state that Imam Ali (AS) went to Abu Bakr and pledged allegiance to him after this incident. Second Category (Narrations Describing Violence): Ibn Qutaybah, Abu Muhammad Abdullah ibn Muslim Dinawari (213-276 AH), recounts the following incident: Abu Bakr sent Umar to confront those who had not pledged allegiance and had taken refuge in Imam Ali’s house. Umar arrived at Ali’s house and called out, but no one came out. Umar asked for firewood and said: By the One in Whose hand is Umar's life, either you should come out and pledge allegiance or I will burn the house down on the heads of those who are in it. They informed him that Fatimah (SA) was inside. Umar replied, “Even if Fatimah is inside…” When Fatimah (SA) heard their voices, she cried out loudly, “O father” and “O Messenger of Allah.” What injustices we have seen from Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafah after you! The attackers, upon hearing Fatimah’s cries, were moved and left, except for Umar and a few others. They forcibly brought Ali outside and demanded that he pledge allegiance. Ali asked, “What will you do if I refuse to pledge allegiance?” They replied, “By Allah, we will strike your neck.”[8] Additionally, Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm ibn Sayyār ibn Hāni‘ an-Naẓẓām (185-230 AH), refers to the violation of the sanctity of Lady Fatimah (SA) by Umar. He describes how Umar struck her abdomen during the incident of allegiance, causing her to miscarry.[9] Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Husayn Mas’udi (280-345 AH), regarded by some as a Sunni scholar, recounts a similar incident. He states: “They approached Ali’s house, attacked it, and set it on fire. They pressed Lady Fatimah (SA) against the door until she miscarried Mohsen.”[10] These narrations go beyond threats. They assert that Umar forcibly entered Lady Fatimah's house, leading to the tragic events that resulted in the death of her son, Mohsen. Additional Evidence: 1. Abu Bakr’s Regret Over the Attack on Lady Fatimah’s House: It is important to mention that one of the most compelling pieces of evidence regarding the attack on Lady Fatimah's house comes from Abu Bakr's own words as he lay on his deathbed. He expressed regret for some actions he had taken, one of which involved the incident of the attack on Lady Fatimah’s house. This account was narrated by Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, a reputable figure in the Sunni tradition, and many prominent Sunni scholars have included it in their writings.[11] Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf stated: “I visited Abu Bakr during his illness, the same illness from which he eventually passed away. I greeted him and inquired about his well-being. After conveying some words to him, I said, ‘By Allah, we recognized you as a righteous man.’” Abu Bakr replied: “However, I have no hope except for three things. I wish I had not done these three things....” He continued: “As for those three actions that I regret: I wish I hadn't broken the privacy of Fatimah's (SA) house and attacked it and I would have left her alone, even if a war had broken out because of this.” In this narration, the first caliph explicitly acknowledges that he regrets attacking Lady Fatimah’s house and breaking its sanctity. This account strongly supports the historical reality of the attack, especially considering its context within the struggle for leadership. 2. Imam Juwayni’s Narration from Prophet Muhammad (SAW): Another piece of evidence supporting the occurrence of this attack and emphasizing the oppression faced by Fatimah al-Zahra (SA) can be found in a narration attributed to the respected Sunni scholar Imam Juwayni. He reported that on one occasion, the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was sitting when Hasan ibn Ali entered. The Prophet's eyes filled with tears upon seeing Hasan. Then, when Hussain ibn Ali entered, the Prophet wept once more. Following them, Fatimah and Ali (AS) arrived, and the Prophet’s tears flowed again. When asked about the reason for his tears regarding Fatimah (SA), the Prophet replied: “When I saw her, I remembered what would happen to her after my demise. It was as if I could see humiliation entering her house, her sanctity being violated, her rights being usurped, her inheritance denied, and her side being struck (causing her to miscarry). She would cry out, ‘O Muhammad!’ But no one would answer her call for help. She would seek assistance, but no one would come to her aid. She would be the first from my household to join me, appearing before me as a grieving, oppressed, sorrowful, and martyred. At that moment, I would say, ‘O Allah, curse those who wronged her, punish those who seized her rights, humiliate those who oppressed her, and eternally condemn those who struck her side until she lost her child.’ And the angels would respond, ‘Ameen.’”[12] Conclusion: Numerous narrations from credible Sunni sources provide clear evidence about the invasion of Lady Fatima's (SA) house and the inappropriate treatment she endured. These accounts have been documented by many Sunni historians and hadith scholars, including Tabari, Musa ibn Uqbah, Baladhari, Ibn Abi Shaybah, and Suyuti. They confirm that this historical event is an undeniable fact. Furthermore, some Sunni historians, such as Ibn Qutaybah Dinawari and Nizzam, have explicitly mentioned the beating of Lady Fatima (SA) and the resultant miscarriage of her fetus. [1] . Al-Iktifā’ bimā taḍmunuhu min maġāzī Rasūl Allāh (SAW) wal-thalāthatu al-khulafā’(Sufficiency with what it contains the battles of the Messenger of God - may God bless him and grant him peace - and the three caliphs): Abū al-Rabīʿ al-Kalāʿī, vol:2, p: 57. «فجاءهما عمر بن الخطاب فى عصابة من المهاجرين والأنصار فيهم أسيد بن حضير وسلمة بن سلامة بن وقش الأشهليان وثابت بن قيس بن شماس الخزرجى فكلموهما حتى أخذ أحد القوم سيف الزبير فضرب به الحجر حتى كسره.» [2] . Al-Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah: Ibn Abī Shaybah, Abū Bakr, vol: 7, p: 432. «فلما بلغ ذلك عمر بن الخطاب خرج حتى دخل على فاطمة فقال: «يا بنت رسول الله (ص) والله ما من أحد أحب إلينا من أبيك, وما من أحد أحب إلينا بعد أبيك منك, وايم الله ما ذاك بمانعي إن اجتمع هؤلاء النفر عندك; أن أمرتهم أن يحرق عليهم البيت.» [3] . Anṣāb al-Ashrāf: al-Balādhurī, vol: 1, p: 586. «فتلقته فاطمة على الباب، فقالت فاطمة: يا ابن الْخَطَّابِ، أَتُرَاكَ مُحَرِّقًا عَلَيَّ بَابِي؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ، وَذَلِكَ أَقْوَى فِيمَا جَاءَ بِهِ أَبُوك.» [4] . Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī (Tārīkh al-Rusul wal-Mulūk, waṣlah Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī): Abū Jaʿfar al-Ṭabarī, vol: 3, p: 202. «أَتَى عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ مَنْزِلَ عَلِيٍّ وَفِيهِ طَلْحَةُ وَالزُّبَيْرُ وَرِجَالٌ مِنَ الْمُهَاجِرِينَ، فَقَالَ: وَاللَّهِ لأَحْرِقَنَّ عَلَيْكُمْ أَوْ لَتَخْرُجُنَّ إِلَى الْبَيْعَةِ.» [5] . Al-ʿUqd al-Farīd: Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih al-Andalusī, vol: 5, p: 13 / Al-Istiʿāb: Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, vol: 3, p: 975. [6] . Jāmiʿ al-Aḥādīth: Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, vol: 26, p: 395. [7] . Kanz al-ʿUmmāl fī Sunan al-Aqwāl wal-Afʿāl: Al-Muttaqī al-Hindī, vol: 5, p: 651. [8] . Al-Imāmah wal-Siyāsah: al-Dīnawarī, Ibn Qutaybah, vol: 1, p: 30. «فبعث إليهم عمر ، فجاء فناداهم وهم في دار علي ، فأبوا أن يخرجوا فدعا بالحطب وقال : والذي نفسه عمر بيده . لتخرجن أو لأحرقنها على من فيها ، فقيل له : يا أبا حفص ، إن فيها فاطمة ؟ فقال : وإن ، ...... فلما سمعت أصواتهم نادت بأعلى صوتها : يا أبت يا رسول الله ، ماذا لقينا بعدك من ابن الخطاب وابن أبي قحافة ، فلما سمع القوم صوتها وبكاءها ، انصرفوا باكين ، وكادت قلوبهم تنصدع ، وأكبادهم تنفطر ، وبقي عمر ومعه قوم ، فأخرجوا عليا ، فمضوا به إلى أبي بكر ، فقالوا له : بايع ، فقال : إن أنا لم أفعل فمه ؟ قالوا : إذا والله الذي لا إله إلا هو نضرب عنقك» [9] . Al-Milal wal-Niḥal: al-Shahrastānī, vol: 1, p: 57 / Al-Wāfī bi al-Wafayāt: al-Ṣafadī, vol: 6, p: 15. «إن عمر ضرب بطن فاطمة يوم البيعة حتى ألقت الجنين من بطنها.» [10] . Ithbāt al-Waṣīyah: Masʿūdī, p: 146. :«فَوَجهُوا اِلی مَنْزلِهِ فَهَجَمُوا عَلَیْهِ وَ اَحْرَقُوابابَهُ وَ ضَغَطُوا سَیدَةَ النساءِ بِالْبابِ حَتی اَسْقَطَتْ مُحْسِنا» [11] . Kanz al-ʿUmmāl: Al-Muttaqī al-Hindī, vol: 5, p: 631 / Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī: al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Jarīr, vol: 2, p: 619 / Sāqifah wa Fadak: Abī Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Jawharī Baghdādī, p: 70. [12] . Furāʾid al-Samtayn: al-Ḥamawī al-Juwaynī, Ibrāhīm, vol: 2, p: 35. «وَ اَنِّی لَمَّا رَاَیْتُهَا ذَکَرْتُ مَا یُصْنَعُ بِهَا بَعْدِی کَاَنِّی بِهَا وَ قَدْ دَخَلَ الذُّلُّ فی بَیْتَهَا وَ انْتُهِکَتْ حُرْمَتُهَا وَ غُصِبَتْ حَقَّهَا وَ مُنِعَتْ اِرْثَهَا وَ کُسِرَ جَنْبُهَا (وَ کُسِرَتْ جَنْبَتُهَا) وَ اَسْقَطَتْ جَنِینَهَا وَ هِیَ تُنَادِی یَا مُحَمَّدَاهْ فَلَا تُجَابُ وَ تَسْتَغِیثُ فَلَا تُغَاثُ... فَتَکُونُ اَوَّلَ مَنْ یَلْحَقُنِی مِنْ اهل‌بیتی فَتَقْدَمُ عَلَیَّ مَحْزُونَةً مَکْرُوبَةً مَغْمُومَةً مَغْصُوبَةً مَقْتُولَة. فَاَقُولُ عِنْدَ ذَلِکَ اللَّهُمَّ الْعَنْ مَنْ ظَلَمَهَا وَ عَاقِبْ مَنْ غَصَبَهَا وَ ذَلِّلْ مَنْ اَذَلَّهَا وَ خَلِّدْ فِی نَارِکَ مَنْ ضَرَبَ جَنْبَهَا حَتَّی اَلْقَتْ وَلَدَهَا فَتَقُولُ الْمَلَائِکَةُ عِنْدَ ذَلِکَ آمِین.»

Why did Imam Ali (AS) not react during the insult to Lady Fatimah (SA) and the burning of their house’s door? Firstly, it’s essential to note that throughout Islamic history, similar incidents have occurred where individuals were forced to remain silent due to expediency. This lack of reaction or silence was not exclusive to the event involving Imam Ali (AS). For instance, during the conversion of the family of Ammar, his mother and father were martyred under torture, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) witnessed this suffering, yet he consoled them, saying, “O family of Yasir, be patient, for your promised abode is Paradise.”[1] Even during the rebellion against Caliph Uthman, there were instances. For example, Soudan ibn Hamran attacked Uthman, severing his wife’s finger, and behaved inappropriately towards Uthman's wife. [2] In another account, a witness stated that during the attack on Uthman’s house, he saw Uthman’s wife coming out, and he struck her. Uthman looked on and cursed but did not react. [3] Is it reasonable to question why Uthman did not defend his wife or respond to the insults and attacks against her? Imam Ali (AS) did respond when they tried to harm his wife, confronting Umar, knocking him down, and striking his face and neck. But because he was commanded to be patient, he refrained from further confrontation. Imam Ali (AS) wanted to convey that if he hadn’t been ordered to endure patiently, no one would have dared to even think of such actions against him. His unwavering commitment to divine orders guided his behavior. Alusi, a prominent Sunni commentator, narrates an account from Shia sources,[4] describing the incident: Umar became angry, set fire to the door of Imam Ali’s house, and entered. Fatimah (SA) rushed toward Umar, crying out, ‘O father, O Messenger of Allah!’ Umar drew his sword, which was in its sheath, and struck Fatimah’s side. He then raised the sword to strike her arm. Witnessing this, Imam Ali (AS) suddenly rose, seized Umar by the collar, pulled him forcefully, and threw him to the ground, striking his nose and neck. [5] Despite enduring immense hardships during this event, Imam Ali (AS) followed the command he had received from Prophet Muhammad (SAW) to remain patient. In the book ‘Khasa’is al-A’imma,’ Seyyed Razi refers to this incident and writes that Prophet Muhammad (SAW) instructed Imam Ali (AS): ‘Be patient with whatever comes to you from this group until they advance against me.’[6] In other words, Imam Ali (AS) was ordered to endure patiently in the face of adversity. In a lengthy narration from Solim ibn Qays al-Hilali, it is reported that Imam Ali (AS) said to Umar: ‘O son of Sohak, if it were not for the divine decree and the covenant made by the Messenger of Allah (SAW) regarding me, you would know that you would not be able to enter my house.’ [7] Therefore, the primary reason for Imam Ali’s behavior lies in his unwavering commitment to divine orders. He exemplified complete submission to the will of Allah, as emphasized in the verse: ‘Whatever the Messenger has given you, take; and what he has forbidden you, refrain from.’[8] Imam Ali (AS) adhered to this command. In another narration, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said to Imam Ali (AS): ‘When your rights are violated and your sanctity is dishonored, be patient!’ Imam Ali (AS) responded: 'By the God who split the seed and created people, I heard that Gabriel said to the Prophet (SAW): ‘O Muhammad! Inform Ali that his sanctity will be violated.’ In continuation, Imam Ali (AS) said: ‘I accepted and consented, even though my sanctity would be violated, and traditions would be neglected…’ [9] It is worth noting that the reason for the command to exercise patience by the Prophet (SAW) was based on the interests, which were expressed differently in the words of Imam Ali. Where He said: ‘I have observed that patience in this matter is better than creating division among the Muslims and shedding their blood. Especially since people had recently converted to Islam, and the nascent religion of Islam is like a delicate plant that any neglect can lead to its corruption, and even the slightest force can destroy it.’ [10] The Imam's (AS) words conveyed that any internal conflict within the Islamic nation, specifically in Medina, could jeopardize the lives of the Prophet's family.[11] Such strife would create an opportunity for the enemies of Islam and hypocrites to easily uproot the young foundations of Islam. This concern was particularly pressing given the looming threat of an attack from the Roman Emperor, whose forces were stationed at the borders of the Islamic territory. Several conflicts had already occurred between the Roman army and the Islamic forces. The danger was so significant that Rasulullah’s final command was to mobilize an army to the borders to deter any potential Roman invasion. [12] Therefore, according to Shia narrations, the primary reason for Imam Ali’s patience during this incident was the explicit command from Prophet Muhammad (SAW) to endure patiently. This command aimed to preserve the unity of Muslims and prevent internal conflicts. [1] . Ansab al-Ashraf: al-Baladhuri, Vol: 1, P: 158 / Al-Isti’ab fi Tamyiz al-Sahaba: al-Asqalani, Ibn Hajar, Vol: 8, P: 190. [2] . Tarikh al-Tabari (History of Prophets and Kings): Tabari, Abu Jaafar, Vol: 4, P: 391 / Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh: Al-Jazari, Izz al-Din ibn al-Athir Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Muhammad (died 630 AH), Vol. 2, p. 544, edited by Abdullah al-Qadi / Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah: Al-Qurashi al-Dimashqi, Ismail ibn Umar ibn Katheer Abu al-Fida (died 774 AH), Vol. 7, p. 210, Publisher: Maktabat al-Maarif - Beirut. [3] . Karamat al-Awliya (Miracles of the Saints) from the commentary on the beliefs of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah: Al-Lalakai, Vol: 9, P: 132. [4] . Kitab Solim ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Solim bin Qais, p. 387. [5] . Tafsir Ruh al-Ma’ani: Al-Alusi, Shihab al-Din, Vol: 2, P: 120. [6] . Khasa’is al-A’imma: Sayyid Sharif al-Radi, Vol. 1, p. 73. [7] . Kitab Solim ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Solim bin Qais, p. 387. [8] . Al-Hashr: 7. [9] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni, Vol: 1, P: 282. [10] . Nahj al-Balagha Commentary: Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Vol. 1, p. 308. [11] . As the Imam also said: "So I pondered and saw that I had no helper except my family, and I was reluctant to sacrifice them for death, and I endured the pain and drank the bitterness and patiently endured the taking of oppression." Nahj al-Balagha: Sayyid Sharif al-Radi, Sermon 26, p. 68. [12] . History of Yaqoubi: Ahmad bin Abi Yaqoob, vol: 2, P: 113.

Why is the Exact Date of Lady Fatimah's (SA) Martyrdom Uncertain? The precise date of Hazrat Fatimah's (SA) martyrdom, the daughter of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and the wife of Imam Ali (AS), has been a subject of considerable debate among Shia Muslims. Various factors contribute to this historical uncertainty. 1. Lack of Precise Historical Records: One of the main reasons for the discrepancy lies in the absence of a precise historical recording system during that time. Most significant events were transmitted orally and were rarely documented in writing. This limitation applies not only to Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom but also to other events related to the Ahl al-Bayt (AS).[1] 2. Challenges in Ancient Writing Systems: Additionally, the style of calligraphy and script prevalent during that period played a crucial role. [2] Kufic script, which lacked diacritical marks (such as dots), was common. This led to potential misreading of similar words, such as “خمسة و سبعون” (75) and “خمسة و تسعون” (95). Such errors in oral transmission of narrations and in handwritten copies contributed to differing opinions regarding the precise date of Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom. Now, let’s explore the different viewpoints regarding the date of her martyrdom: 75 Days After the Prophet's Demise: Some narrations, including those attributed to Imam Sadiq (AS) and Imam Baqir (AS), suggest that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) passed away 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) death. Al-Kulayni has narrated a hadith from Imam Sadiq (AS) in this regard in his book "Al-Kafi";[3] Allama Majlisi also quotes a hadith from Imam Baqir (AS) confirming this duration in "Bihar al-Anwar".[4] Some historians have also stated that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) passed away 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) demise. For instance, Ibn Abi Tha'lab Baghdadi writes in his book "Tarikh al-A'imah" that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) lived for 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) demise. [5] 95 Days After the Prophet’s Demise: Other narrations suggest that Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom occurred 95 days after the Prophet’s passing. For instance, a narration from Jabir ibn Abdullah Ansari mentions that she lived for 95 days after the Prophet’s demise. [6] Prominent scholars, including Sheikh Mufid, [7] Sayyid ibn Tawus, [8] Kaf’ami in “Al-Misbah,” [9] and Allameh Tabarsi in "Alam Al-Wara"[10] assert that Lady Fatimah (SA) passed away on the third of Jumada al-Akhir in the eleventh year after the Hijra. According to this view, she lived for 95 days after her father’s departure. In conclusion, due to the reasons mentioned above and the diversity of narrations, we cannot definitively determine the exact date of Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom. However, what truly matters is our respect for all valid narrations and the observance of mourning ceremonies on both proposed dates. Such reverence is commendable and draws us closer to the Almighty. [1] . For example: Regarding the birth of Imam Hussain (as), it is stated as follows: He was born on the 3rd of Sha'ban in the 4th year of Hijri in Medina, and according to some, he was born on the 5th of Sha'ban in the 4th year of Hijri. Arabization of Muntaha al-Amal in the History of the Prophet and his Family: Al-Milani, Al-Sayyid Hashim, vol. 1, p. 523. [2] To learn more about the calligraphy of that era, you can refer to the article "History of Quranic Calligraphy and Its Evolution" written by Seyyed Mehdi Saif. [3] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni, vol. 1, p. 241. [4] . Bihar al-Anwar: Allamah al-Majlisi, Vol. 43, p. 7. [5] . A Precious Collection in the History of the Imams: a Collection of Scholars, Vol. 1, p. 12. [6] . Kifayat al-Athar fi al-Nass ala al-A'immah al-Ashar: Ali ibn Muhammad al-Khazzaz, Page: 65. [7] . Masar al-Shi'a: Al-Sheikh Al-Mufid, vol. 1, p. 31. [8] . Al-Iqbal al-Amaal al-Hasna: Al-Sayyid bin Tawus, vol. 3, p. 161. [9] . Al-Masbah - Jannah al-Aman al-Waqiyyah and Jannah al-Iman al-Baqiyyah: Al-Sheikh Ebrahim Al-Kafami Al-Amili, vol. 1, p. 511. [10] . The life of the Fourteen Infallible Ones (as): translation of "Alam Al-Wara" by Attardi, Azizullah, p. 226.

Is Du'a' al-'Ahd Authentically Attributed to Imam Sadiq (AS)? Du'a' al-'Ahd (the Supplication of the Covenant) is a well-known supplication among Shi'a Muslims, commonly recited during the era of the Occultation to renew our allegiance and covenant with Imam Mahdi (AJTF). We have recited this supplication and believe in its profound spiritual benefits. However, a question often arises: Is this supplication genuinely narrated from Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (AS), or is it a reliable tradition? Scholars’ Perspectives: Numerous scholars and religious authorities, including Sayyid Ibn Tawus in his book “Misbah al-Za’ir,”[1] Ibn Mashhadi in “Al-Mazar al-Kabir,” [2] Kaf’ami in “Al-Misbah” [3] and “Al-Balad al-Amin,” [4] and Allama Majlisi in “Bihar al-Anwar” and “Zad al-Ma’ad,” [5] have transmitted this supplication. Allama Majlisi cites this supplication in three places within “Bihar al-Anwar.” In one instance, he attributes it to the book “Al-Atiq” (The Ancient Book), [6] which was written by an early scholar and seen by Allama Majlisi himself in Najaf. [7] According to him, Kaf’ami says “Al-Atiq” was authored by Sheikh Jalil Abu al-Hussein Muhammad bin Haroun Al-Talla'ukbari. [8] Agha Bozorg Tehrani also confirms this view. [9] In another narration, Allama Majlisi cites the supplication with a chain of transmission that begins with his own father. [10] Additionally, he quotes this supplication based on the narration of the late Sayyid Ibn Tawus. [11] Therefore, scholars have relied on this supplication and attributed it to Imam Sadiq (AS). Evidence for the Validity of the Du'a' al-'Ahd: • Reliable Narrators: The individuals who transmitted this supplication are prominent Shia scholars and experts in hadith. • Multiple Sources: This supplication appears in various books and has been transmitted by numerous scholars and narrators. • Content Consistency: The content of this supplication aligns perfectly with Shia beliefs and does not contradict any religious teachings. While there may be some minor doubts regarding the chain of transmission (sanad) of this supplication, it is argued that given the trustworthiness of scholars who have transmitted it and the principle of tolerance in the evidence of traditions (as accepted by many scholars), [12] we can establish the recommendation (Istihbab) of reciting this supplication. Conclusion Based on the evidence presented, it is reasonable to conclude that the Du'a' al-'Ahd is an authentic supplication within the Shi'a tradition. Although minor doubts may persist regarding specific aspects of its chain of transmission, the trust placed in religious authorities and the beautiful content of this supplication allow us to have confidence in its authenticity. [1] . Misbah al-Zaer: Sayyid Ali bin Musa bin Tawus, Vol: 1, p: 455. [2] . Al-Mazar al-Kabir: Muhammad Bin Al-Mashhadi, Vol: 1, P: 663. [3] . Al-Misbah: Al-Kaf'ami al-Amili, Sheikh Ibrahim, Vol: 1, P: 549. [4] . Al-Balad Al-Amin and Al-Dara Al-Hassein: Al-Kafami Al-Amili, Sheikh Ibrahim, Vol: 1, P: 82. [5] . Zad al-Ma'ad - Miftah al-Jinnan: Allama al-Majlisi, vol: 1, p: 542. [6] . Bihar al-Anwar: Allama al-Majlisi, vol: 86, p: 284. [7] . Ibid., vol: 1, p: 16. [8] . Ibid., vol: 1, p: 33. [9] . Al-Dhariyah 'iilaa tasanif Al-Shi'ia: Al-Tehrani, Agha Bozorg, Vol: 20, P: 323. [10] . Bihar al-Anwar: Allama al-Majlisi, vol: 94, p: 41. [11] . Ibid., vol: 102, p: 111. [12] . Al-Hadaiq al-Nadrah in the rulings of Al-Utrah al-Tahira: Al-Bahrani, Sheikh Yusuf, Vol: 4, pp. 202-203.

Why doesn't Imam Mahdi (AJTF) solve the problems of the Shia? Shia believes that Imam Mahdi (AJTF) is the proof of Allah on Earth and that Allah conducts all affairs through him. The Earth remains standing due to his existence. On the other hand, there are numerous reports of encounters with him and miracles performed by him to fulfill the needs of the Shia, which indicate his grace and attention to the Shia community.[1] However, carrying out these matters does not mean that the prophets and imams (AS) must solve all society's problems, nor should the proof of their legitimacy depend on this. Throughout the history of humanity, the divine prophets, despite their ability to perform extraordinary deeds and their power to alleviate problems and hardships,[2] have faced numerous challenges and difficulties in preserving Allah's religion, and Allah has commanded them to strive and make efforts in the path of truth, even in situations where they might lose their lives.[3] Although numerous miracles have been issued from the Prophet (SAW),[4] the followers of Islam also endured many hardships during their time in Mecca, with some even losing their lives under the torture of polytheists.[5] Therefore, it should be said that the nature of this universe is based on the fact that things are done based on human effort.[6] Regarding the movement of Imam al-Mahdi (AJTF), it should be noted that it is not expected that the administration of the affairs of the Shiites will be entirely miraculous and that no one in the Shiite community will face any problems. This is part of human life in the material world. As Imam Khomeini (may his soul rest in peace) stated about the events after the advent: "Some believe that everything will be miraculously corrected in one night; while after the advent of the Imam, efforts and sacrifices will be made to suppress the oppressors. If you expect that everything will transform overnight according to Islam and the commands of Almighty Allah, this is a mistake, and such a miracle has never occurred in the entire history of humanity, nor will it. The day that, Allah willing, the universal reformer reappears, do not think that a miracle will happen, and the world will be corrected in one day; rather, through efforts and sacrifices, the oppressors will be suppressed and isolated."[7] As a result, it can be said that Allah has based human life in the material world on tests,[8] free will,[9] and the upbringing of society. While human freedom can lead to challenges and hardships,[10] divine tests are accompanied by difficulties and hardships that contribute to the growth and elevation of individuals and the education of society. Therefore, it cannot be stated that if Imam al-Mahdi (AJTF) exists and is alive, all the problems of the Shiites must be resolved, and the Imam will remove all obstacles from the path of the Shiite community through extraordinary actions. This was not the case during the time of his noble ancestor, the Messenger of Allah (SAW), and other divine prophets (AS). [1] . Sultan Al-Mufrij ‘an Ahl Al-Iman fi Man Ra’a Sahib Al-Zaman: Ali bin Abdul Karim Al-Nili, Vol: 1, P: 37. [2] . As an example, His Eminence Jesus (AS) is mentioned in the Quran: Al-Imran: 49 «أَنِّي أَخْلُقُ لَكُمْ مِنَ الطِّينِ كَهَيْئَةِ الطَّيْرِ فَأَنْفُخُ فِيهِ فَيَكُونُ طَيْرًا بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ ۖ وَأُبْرِئُ الْأَكْمَهَ وَالْأَبْرَصَ وَأُحْيِي الْمَوْتَىٰ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ ۖ وَأُنَبِّئُكُمْ بِمَا تَأْكُلُونَ وَمَا تَدَّخِرُونَ فِي بُيُوتِكُمْ». And what happened to Moses (AS): Al-Baqarah: 50«وَإِذْ فَرَقْنَا بِكُمُ الْبَحْرَ فَأَنْجَيْنَاكُمْ وَأَغْرَقْنَا آلَ فِرْعَوْنَ وَأَنْتُمْ تَنْظُرُونَ».” [3] . Al-Ma'idah: 21 to 26 [4] . Like the miracle of the return of the sun: Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih: Sheikh al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 203. [5] . The authentic biography of the Great Prophet (saw): Al-Amili, Sayyid Ja'far Murtaza, Vol. 3, p. 221. [6] . An-Najm: 39 «وَأَنْ لَيْسَ لِلْإِنْسَانِ إِلَّا مَا سَعَىٰ» [7] . Imam's Sahifah: Khomeini, Sayyid Ruhollah, Vol. 21, p. 447. [8] . Al-Baqarah: 155 «وَلَنَبْلُوَنَّكُمْ بِشَيْءٍ مِّنَ الْخَوفْ وَالْجُوعِ وَنَقْصٍ مِّنَ الأَمَوَالِ وَالأنفُسِ وَالثَّمَرَاتِ وَبَشِّرِ الصَّابِرِينَ» [9] . Al-Kahf: 29 «وَقُلِ الحَقُّ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ فَمَنْ شاءَ فَلْيُؤْمِنْ وَمَنْ شاءَ فَلْيَكْفُرْ» [10] . Al-Shura: 30 «وَما أَصابَكُمْ مِنْ مُصِيبَةٍ فَبِما كَسَبَتْ أَيْدِيكُمْ وَيَعْفُو عَنْ كَثِيرٍ»