Search the Community

Which verses of the Quran address the topic of the Ma'ad? One of the fundamental principles in Islamic beliefs is faith in the Day of Judgment; the Holy Quran extensively and in detail addresses topics related to the Day of Judgment and clearly explains this principle of belief; In various verses of the Quran, multiple issues regarding the Day of Judgment have been discussed, each of which has special importance and contributes to a deeper understanding of this concept; These topics include the following: Resurrection and revival: The Holy Quran emphasizes the revival of humans on the Day of Judgment; For example, in Surah Yaseen it is stated: "وَضَرَبَ لَنَا مَثَلًا وَنَسِيَ خَلْقَهُ قَالَ مَنْ يُحْيِي الْعِظَامَ وَهِيَ رَمِيمٌ قُلْ يُحْيِيهَا الَّذِي أَنْشَأَهَا أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ خَلْقٍ عَلِيمٌ". And he set forth for Us a parable and forgot his own creation. He said: Who will give life to the bones when they are decayed? Say: He will give them life Who created them the first time, and He is Knower of every creation.[1] This emphasis on revival in this blessed verse indicates the importance of the Day of Judgment and its role in motivating the performance of good deeds and abstinence from sins; The belief that after death we will be resurrected again and will be accountable before God has a profound impact on the behavior and morals of people and guides them towards performing righteous deeds and following divine commands. Reckoning: One of the important topics in the Holy Quran is the accounting of people's deeds on the Day of Judgment; For example, in Surah Zilzal it is stated: "فَمَنْ يَعْمَلْ مِثْقَالَ ذَرَّةٍ خَيْرًا يَرَهُ وَمَنْ يَعْمَلْ مِثْقَالَ ذَرَّةٍ شَرًّا يَرَهُ". Then whoever does an atom's weight of good will see it, and whoever does an atom's weight of evil will see it. [2] Attention to the precise accounting of deeds on the Day of Judgment motivates people to always pay more attention to their actions and behavior and strive to create a brighter and better future for themselves in the hereafter by performing good deeds and avoiding sins; This belief that all our actions are recorded and will be calculated on the Day of Judgment leads us towards a more responsible and ethical life. Reward and Punishment: The Holy Quran describes Heaven and Hell, and explains the reward of the righteous and the punishment of the evildoers; for example, in the blessed Surah Baqarah it is stated: "وَبَشِّرِ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ أَنَّ لَهُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ كُلَّمَا رُزِقُوا مِنْهَا مِنْ ثَمَرَةٍ رِزْقًا قَالُوا هَذَا الَّذِي رُزِقْنَا مِنْ قَبْلُ وَأُتُوا بِهِ مُتَشَابِهًا وَلَهُمْ فِيهَا أَزْوَاجٌ مُطَهَّرَةٌ وَهُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ". And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds, that they shall have gardens beneath which rivers flow; every time they are provided with a fruit therefrom, they will say: This is what we were provided with before, and they shall be provided with similar things; and they shall have therein pure spouses, and they shall abide therein forever. [3] These descriptions show that on the Day of Judgment, each person will receive a reward or punishment based on their actions; belief in reward and punishment plays an essential role in guiding people towards doing good deeds and avoiding sins and provides a strong motivation for adherence to divine and ethical commands. Intercession: The Holy Quran refers to the intercession of the prophets and imams on the Day of Judgment; for example, in the blessed Surah Anbiya it is stated: "يَعْلَمُ مَا بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَمَا خَلْفَهُمْ وَلَا يَشْفَعُونَ إِلَّا لِمَنِ ارْتَضَى وَهُمْ مِنْ خَشْيَتِهِ مُشْفِقُونَ". He knows what is before them and what is behind them, and they shall not intercede except for whom He is pleased with, and they are fearful of His Majesty.[4] In fact, intercession is one of the manifestations of God's mercy on the Day of Judgment, which provides another opportunity for sinful servants to be saved; this motivates believers in the hereafter to strive to benefit from the intercession of the prophets and imams and to take steps towards self-improvement; intercession not only means forgiveness of sins but also indicates the greatness and mercy of God on the Day of Judgment. Divine Justice: One of the most important topics related to the Day of Judgment in the Quran is divine justice; God will act justly on the Day of Judgment; for example, in another part of the blessed Surah Anbiya, it is stated: "وَنَضَعُ الْمَوَازِينَ الْقِسْطَ لِيَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ فَلَا تُظْلَمُ نَفْسٌ شَيْئًا وَإِنْ كَانَ مِثْقَالَ حَبَّةٍ مِنْ خَرْدَلٍ أَتَيْنَا بِهَا وَكَفَى بِنَا حَاسِبِينَ". And We will set up the scales of justice on the Day of Resurrection, so no soul will be wronged in anything, even if it is the weight of a mustard seed; We are sufficient as reckoners. [5] Divine justice on the Day of Judgment means that no one can escape the reckoning of their deeds, and everyone will be justly punished or rewarded based on their actions; this emphasis on divine justice assures believers that ultimately everyone will receive their due, and there will be no injustice in the Day of Judgment; this belief in divine justice guides people towards doing good deeds and avoiding evil, and encourages them to be responsible and committed to divine commandments. Life After Death: Numerous verses refer to life after death and the experiences thereafter; for example, in the blessed Surah Mu'minun it is stated: "لَعَلِّي أَعْمَلُ صَالِحًا فِيمَا تَرَكْتُ كَلَّا إِنَّهَا كَلِمَةٌ هُوَ قَائِلُهَا وَمِنْ وَرَائِهِمْ بَرْزَخٌ إِلَى يَوْمِ يُبْعَثُونَ". Perhaps I may do righteous deeds for what I have left behind. (It will be said to him,) Never! That is a word that he himself will utter. And behind them is a barrier until the day they are resurrected. [6] The emphasis on life after death clearly shows that people's actions in this world have a significant impact on their hereafter; this belief in life after death encourages people to open a path to a better destiny in the other world by doing good deeds and avoiding sins in their worldly life and to always remember that their life will continue in another world. Stages of the Day of Judgment: The Holy Quran describes the different stages of the Day of Judgment; for example, in Surah Ta-Ha, it is stated: "وَيَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الْجِبَالِ فَقُلْ يَنسِفُهَا رَبِّي نَسْفًا فَيَذَرُهَا قَاعًا صَفْصَفًا لَا تَرَى فِيهَا عِوَجًا وَلَا أَمْتًا". And they will ask you about the mountains, so say, My Lord will level them to dust, and He will leave it as a smooth plain, you will see no unevenness or mound in it. [7] These descriptions show God's power and greatness in changing the world and establishing the Day of Judgment; the different stages of the Day of Judgment show that the world will return to its initial state and all-natural and geographical structures will undergo great changes; this belief in the occurrence of such transformations emphasizes the certainty and seriousness of the Day of Judgment and reminds people of the great day when everything will change under God's will and command. Signs of the Day of Judgment: The Quran refers to the signs and portents of the Day of Judgment; for example, in Surah Al-Zalzalah, it is stated: "إِذَا زُلْزِلَتِ الْأَرْضُ زِلْزَالَهَا وَأَخْرَجَتِ الْأَرْضُ أَثْقَالَهَا". When the earth is shaken with its greatest shaking, and the earth brings forth its burdens. [8] These kinds of earthquakes and great natural changes indicate the great and fundamental changes that will occur on the Day of Judgment; these signs remind us that the Day of Judgment is a certain and serious day and that people should prepare for it. Divine Proofs: God has pointed to signs and proofs of the existence of resurrection in the Quran; for example, in Surah Ar-Rum, it is stated: "يُخْرِجُ الْحَيَّ مِنَ الْمَيِّتِ وَيُخْرِجُ الْمَيِّتَ مِنَ الْحَيِّ وَيُحْيِي الْأَرْضَ بَعْدَ مَوْتِهَا وَكَذَلِكَ تُخْرَجُونَ". He brings forth the living from the dead and brings forth the dead from the living, and He revives the earth after its death, and so will you be brought forth. [9] These proofs remind us that just as God can create life from death and death from life, He is also capable of resurrecting humans after death. The revival of the earth after its dryness and lifelessness is presented as an example of divine power in restoring life, demonstrating God's ability to bring humans back to life after death. Heavenly Blessings: The Quran describes the blessings of Paradise and the happiness of its inhabitants. For instance, in Surah Ar-Rahman, it is said: "وَلِمَنْ خَافَ مَقَامَ رَبِّهِ جَنَّتَانِ فَبِأَيِّ آلَاءِ رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ ذَوَاتَا أَفْنَانٍ". And for those who fear the standing (before the might and majesty) of their Lord, there will be two gardens of Paradise. (O jinn and mankind) which of the favors of your Lord will you deny? In those two gardens are various kinds of fruits and blessings. [10] By describing these blessings, the Quran aims to guide humans toward a lofty and sublime goal, reminding them of God and His greatness so that they may heed Him and shape their lives according to divine commandments. Conclusion: The Holy Quran, through its diverse and numerous discussions related to the Hereafter, clearly illustrates the importance and role of this fundamental belief. Emphasizing resurrection, the reckoning of deeds, reward and punishment, intercession, divine justice, and the descriptions of Paradise and Hell all highlight the special place of the Hereafter in Islamic teachings. These verses remind us that our actions and behavior in this world profoundly impact our fate in the afterlife. It is this belief in the Hereafter that creates a strong motivation for doing good and avoiding evil in our lives. [1] . Ya Sin: 78-79. [2] . Az-Zalzalah: 7-8. [3] . Al-Baqarah: 25. [4] . Al-Anbiya: 28. [5] . Al-Anbiya: 47. [6] . Al-Mu’minun: 100. [7] . Ta-Ha: 105-107. [8] . Az-Zalzalah: 1-2. [9] . Ar-Rum: 19. [10] . Ar-Rahman: 46-48

What are the different religions' views on the Ma'ad, and what similarities and differences exist in this regard? Belief in the Day of Judgment, or life after death, is one of the fundamental principles of many divine religions; this belief includes the belief in the return of humans after death to life again and the audit of their actions in the hereafter. here are some examples of these common beliefs in different religions: Zoroastrians: Zoroastrians believe that after death, the human soul spends three days around the body taking care of its past life; after this time, the body is guided towards judgment; in this process, good thoughts, words, and deeds are weighed against bad thoughts, words, and deeds; another belief of Zoroastrians is the belief in the Chinvat Bridge; in this way, if a person is righteous, he will safely cross the bridge and enter heaven;[1] These beliefs of Zoroastrians show their deep belief in the Day of Judgment, divine justice, and accurate accounting in the hereafter. Judaism: In the Old Testament, one of the holy books of Judaism, it is written: "Many of those who sleep* in the dust of the earth shall awake; Some to everlasting life, others to reproach and everlasting disgrace."[2] The Talmud frequently speaks of the Day of Judgment; also, the Old Testament contains information about the prophets' promise of the Day of Judgment; prophets such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Hosea warned the children of Israel with their eloquent statements and warned them of the consequences of their evil and wicked deeds; these prophets reminded the children of Israel that if they continued their wrongdoings, they would face humiliating captivity. [3] In the Old Testament, one of the holy books of Judaism, it is written: " But your dead shall live, their corpses shall rise!" [4] This statement shows the belief in the resurrection of the dead among Jews. Christianity: From the content of the Christian Bible regarding resurrection, it is clear that Christians also believe in the afterlife; they believe that after death, humans are judged in the hereafter and, based on their actions, they will find their way to heaven or hell; the Christian Bible clearly refers to this issue. [5] In the New Testament, one of the Christian holy books, it is written: " and will come out, those who have done good deeds to the resurrection of life, but those who have done wicked deeds to the resurrection of condemnation";[6] this statement in the Christian book shows belief in the afterlife. Buddha: Buddhism's beliefs have been mentioned in this way: when a person dies, our mind, all the inclinations and abilities that it acquired during life, is re-established at the point of conception. When the fetus grows and matures, rebirth takes place, and a new individual is formed with the mental characteristics of the previous individual.[7] In their holy book, it is written: Samsara (meaning wandering), which refers to the ocean of life and death, meaning endless rebirths from which the follower cannot escape except by recognizing the true path that leads to Nirvana. [8] Hindu: In Hinduism, belief in reincarnation is similar to that of Buddhism and is considered an original and well-established faith. In their holy book, it is written: Just as a person sheds worn-out clothes and puts on new ones, the soul casts off worn-out bodies and takes on new ones. [9] In explaining reincarnation, they state that a person at the moment of death has three descriptions: either the person, by overcoming the description (Sat), dominates the description, in which case they understand God; or the person, by overcoming the description (Raj), dominates the description, in which case they appear in the bodies of people who are greedy for results; or the person at the time of death has the description (Tam) dominating them, so they appear in the form of insects and lowly animals like snakes and find new offspring. [10] Islam: In the Holy Quran, it is written: "Every soul shall taste death, and you will be returned to Us." [11] This statement indicates a deep Islamic belief in the Ma'ad and the return to God after death; based on this divine statement, death is only a transition, not annihilation; this is evidence that the Ma'ad is a proven matter in divine speech. Regarding Allah's court on Judgment Day, the Quran says: "By your Lord, We will surely call them to account for what they used to do." [12] These verses demonstrate divine justice and the necessity of accountability for actions on the Day of Judgment; therefore, according to the Islamic perspective, humans will be held accountable on the Day of Judgment; this belief highlights the necessity of accountability for actions and the importance of divine justice in Islam. In Islam, resurrection is physical; in the divine word, it is said: "He presented an example to us and forgot his own creation, and said: 'Who will give life to these bones when they are decayed?' Say: 'He who created them the first time will give them life, and He is Knowing of every creation.'"[13] This statement demonstrates the belief in the physical resurrection of the dead on the Day of Judgment in Islam; this verse answers the doubts of those who considered the resurrection of decaying and scattered bodies unlikely; because the doubt was about the resurrection of bodies, Allah gave them a clear answer. Therefore, this verse refers to a physical resurrection, because Allah will revive the bones, even if they are decayed and disintegrated, and this statement clearly shows the belief in the physical resurrection of the dead on Judgment Day. Differences: Life after death and resurrection are fundamental concepts that have been expressed in various religions with different interpretations; these differences in understanding and teachings sometimes lead to fundamental differences in the beliefs of the followers of these religions; in the following, we will discuss some of these differences and viewpoints to arrive at a more comprehensive picture of the diversity of beliefs in this area. Zoroastrians: In the Zoroastrian view, heaven and hell are not eternal; rather, the purpose of punishments seems to be the reform of individuals. Therefore, it is unlikely that hell is eternal because if hell were eternal, the reform of individuals would not make sense; [14] this Zoroastrian view is incompatible with the Islamic view, which considers heaven and hell to be eternal; in Islam, it is believed that heaven and hell are everlasting and unending. [15] Judaism: In Judaism, there are different views on the afterlife; Saʿadia ben Yosef Gaon, a Jewish scholar in the 9th century CE, believed that the belief in the resurrection is accepted by all Jews; however, some Jews believe that life after death and resurrection is only for the righteous, and the wicked will never rise from their graves and will be eternally dead; Moses Maimonides is among the Jewish thinkers who believe in this view. [16] In Islam, it is believed that every individual, whether righteous or sinful, will appear before the divine court of justice on the Day of Judgment. [17] Christianity: Regarding the Ma'ad, it should be noted that from the Christian perspective, Jesus is the separator and judge among people, who determines who will go to heaven and who will go to hell; [18] while among Muslims, this judgment is the responsibility of Allah, and it is He who judges His servants; [19] this belief shows the deep belief of Muslims in divine justice and judgment. Buddhism and Hinduism: In Buddhism and Hinduism, there is no belief in the Ma'ad, and they believe in reincarnation. Reincarnation is defined as the transfer of the soul from one body to another after death, meaning that heaven and hell are within these human bodies.[20] Conclusion Based on the information provided, it is understood that the divine religions share commonalities regarding the afterlife, however, there are differences in the details and interpretation of this belief; and most of them believe in the return of humans after death and the accounting of their actions on the Day of Judgment; Zoroastrians believe that heaven and hell are not eternal; some Jews believe that sinners will not attain eternal life; Christians believe in the final judgment by Jesus Christ, and Muslims believe in divine justice and the eternity of heaven and hell; in addition, non-divine religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism do not believe in the other world and the Ma'ad, and believe that the soul is transferred from one body to another. [1] . Ayyin-e Zardosht va Parsian (Zoroastrianism and the Persians): Jan Russell, Hinells, p. 68. [2] . Holy Bible, Old Testament, Book of Daniel, Chapter: 12, Verse: 2. [3] . Adyan-e Tohidi (Monotheistic Religions): Javad Baghbani, p. 51. [4] . Holy Book, Old Testament, Isaiah Chapter: 26 Verse: 19. [5] . Holy Bible, New Testament, Matthew Chapter 25, Verses 31-46. [6] . Holy Bible, New Testament, John chapter 5, verse 29. [7] . Amuzehaye Buda (Teachings of the Buda): translated to Persian by Arash Jabraiel, p. 24. [8] . Red Pine (trans.) (2004). The Heart Sutra: The Womb of Buddhas. Counterpoint. [9] . Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 2, In Verse 22. [10] . Ibid.: Chapter 14, In Verse 14.14-15. [11] . Ankabut: 57. «كُلُّ نَفْسٍ ذَائِقَةُ الْمَوْتِ ثُمَّ إِلَيْنَا تُرْجَعُونَ» [12] . Hijr: 92-93. «فَوَرَبِّكَ لَنَسْأَلَنَّهُمْ أَجْمَعِينَ* عَمَّا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ» [13] . Yasin: 78-79. «وَضَرَبَ لَنَا مَثَلًا وَنَسِيَ خَلْقَهُ قَالَ مَنْ يُحْيِي الْعِظَامَ وَهِيَ رَمِيمٌ* قُلْ يُحْيِيهَا الَّذِي أَنْشَأَهَا أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ خَلْقٍ عَلِيمٌ» [14] . Ayyin-e Zardosht va Parsian (Zoroastrianism and the Persians): Jan Russell, Hinells, p. 68. [15] . Baqarah: 39. «وَالَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا وَكَذَّبُوا بِآيَاتِنَا أُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ» / Ra’d: 35. «مَثَلُ الْجَنَّةِ الَّتِي وُعِدَ الْمُتَّقُونَ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ أُكُلُهَا دَائِمٌ وَظِلُّهَا ۚ تِلْكَ عُقْبَى الَّذِينَ اتَّقَوْا وَعُقْبَى الْكَافِرِينَ النَّارُ» [16] . Rastakhiz dar Ahd-e Jadid va Ahd-e Atiq (Ma'ad in New and Old Testaments😞 Forough, Rahimpoor, p. 7. [17] . Yunus: 26-27. «لِلَّذِينَ أَحْسَنُوا الْحُسْنَىٰ وَزِيَادَةٌ وَلَا يَرْهَقُ وُجُوهَهُمْ قَتَرٌ وَلَا ذِلَّةٌ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ الْجَنَّةِ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ* وَالَّذِينَ كَسَبُوا السَّيِّئَاتِ جَزَاءُ سَيِّئَةٍ بِمِثْلِهَا وَتَرْهَقُهُمْ ذِلَّةٌ مَا لَهُمْ مِنَ اللَّهِ مِنْ عَاصِمٍ كَأَنَّمَا أُغْشِيَتْ وُجُوهُهُمْ قِطَعًا مِنَ اللَّيْلِ مُظْلِمًا ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ» [18] . The Holy Bible, New Testament, Matthew, Chapter 25, Verses 31-32. [19] . Hajj: 69. «اللَّهُ يَحْكُمُ بَيْنَكُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فِيمَا كُنْتُمْ فِيهِ تَخْتَلِفُونَ» [20] . Tanasokh (Reincarnation): Fatima, Minaei, Majalleh Naghd va Nazar, 1385 H, No. 43-44, p. 1.

What is the philosophy of belief in the resurrection (Ma'ad) and its effects on humanity? Belief in the Ma'ad, as one of the fundamental principles of Islam, has a profound impact on the individual and social life of humans. This belief in returning to the world after death leads people to reform their behavior and actions and provides a strong incentive to adhere to moral and religious values. The positive effects of faith in the Ma'ad on individual and social life are such that it not only deters individuals from disobeying Allah but also guides society toward justice and fairness. Therefore, without a doubt, someone who believes in such a world is very precise and strict in self-improvement and performing various actions, just as someone who is aware of the properties of healing medicines and deadly poisons is interested in healing medicines and is very afraid of deadly poisons. Such a person is under constant and precise self-care and is automatically controlled against crimes, vices, and corruption.[1] Faith in this clear truth brings a person to the point of saying: If all seven climes of the world and everything under the heavens were given to me to commit the slightest disobedience to Allah, even to the extent of taking the skin of a barleycorn from an ant, I would never accept it, and this world is lower and more insignificant to me than a leaf that a locust eats. [2] The late Dastghayb said about the effect of belief in the Ma'ad on human life: Someone who does not believe in the hereafter has no fear of encroaching on the lives, property, and honor of people, especially if they are involved with them in material interests; therefore, he will not hesitate to encroach on their rights as much as he can. [3] In another statement about the role of the Ma'ad in human life, it should be said that someone who believes in the resurrection plans and manages their life in a way that is beneficial for their afterlife; such a person does not become discouraged by the hardships and problems of life and does not stop striving for eternal happiness; in the social sphere, this belief causes people to respect each other's rights and help the needy with kindness and self-sacrifice. In such a society, the need for coercion and pressure is reduced. [4] Furthermore, it should be said that the worship of most servants is either to avoid the fire of hell or to achieve the eternal blessings of paradise; if there were no belief in the Ma'ad and life after death, the good tidings and warnings of the prophets would lose their original and true meaning, and the worship of Allah would be limited only to a few special divine saints. [5] Belief in the hereafter creates a kind of hope and dynamism in human life because man seeks to achieve perfection in his life so that he does not face any problem in the hereafter; it should be said that the world is connected to the hereafter, and if someone does not seek perfection in this world, he will not be rewarded with perfection in the hereafter and will face regret; [6] and since the individual has not been able to compensate for his shortcomings, he will face eternal problem and loss in the hereafter; for this reason, the Prophet (SAW) said: the world is the farm of the hereafter. [7] In other words, belief in the hereafter has many effects, such as: Spiritual and psychological peace; the believer, since he does not consider death to be the end and termination of life, has peace of mind and is always optimistic about the universe and does not worry about the future. [8] Giving meaning to life; one of the effects of belief in the hereafter in shaping human life is that if there is no life after death, the life of this world will be meaningless and futile. Controlling instincts; one of the important factors that can free the intellect from the captivity of carnal desires and, as a result, enable man to lead and control his instincts, is the remembrance of the hereafter, which prevents man from following whims and desires and controls the unruly instincts of man. Sense of responsibility; one of the blessed effects of belief in the Ma'ad is the awakening of a sense of responsibility in the depth of human beings. Immunity from sin; belief in the hereafter can be a strong deterrent against sin and a motivating factor for doing good deeds. Creating sincerity; one of the sweetest fruits of the Ma'ad is removing polytheism and hypocrisy from intentions. A believer considers only Allah's pleasure in his life and activities and is free from other attachments. A believer in the Ma'ad believes that attachment to the world keeps a man busy and prevents him from his main purpose. Therefore, a believer does not pay attention to anyone other than Allah in his actions and behavior, and the important point is that performing good deeds and having sincerity is the fruit of constant attention to the Ma'ad. Enduring hardships and difficulties is another educational effect of belief in the Ma'ad in the realm of individual life. Self-purification and self-building; another very important effect of belief in the Ma'ad is self-purification and self-building. [9] Conclusion Ultimately, belief in the Ma'ad not only helps in individual reform, but also lays the foundation for justice and fairness in society; this belief guides a person towards performing good deeds and abstaining from sins and strengthens ethics and spirituality in society; Faith in the Ma'ad encourages people to respect each other's rights and to be kind to the needy, and as a result, creates a just and sublime society; therefore, the Ma'ad, as one of the fundamental principles of religion, plays an unparalleled role in shaping the behaviors and beliefs of human beings. [1] . Ma’ad va Jahan Pas az Marg (Resurrection and the world after death): Nasser, Makarem Shirazi, vol. 1, p. 59. [2] . Nahjul-Balagha: Sayyid Razi, Sermon 224. [3] . Saraye Digar: Abd al-Hussein, Dastghaib, vol. 1, p. 5. [4] . Amuzesh-e Aqa’id (Teaching Beliefs): Mohammad Taqi, Misbah Yazdi, vol. 1, p. 339. [5] . Kholaseh-ye Dorus-e Aqa’id (Summary of Beliefs Lessons😞 Mohammad Biyabani Oskui, p. 46. [6] . Ma’ad: Morteza Motahari, vol. 1, p. 16. [7] . Awali al-Laali: Ibn Abi Jamhur, vol. 1, p. 267. [8] . Ma’ad va Asar-e E’teqad be An (Resurrection and the effects of belief in it): Hojjatollah Ardeshiri Lordajani, Omid Fallahi, First Edition, Qom: Zaer, p. 336. [9] . Asar-e E’teqad be Ma’ad dar Zendegi-ye Fardi az Didgah-e Ayat va Revayat (The effects of belief in resurrection in an individual’s life from the perspective of verses and narrations): Maryam Farahzad, Deputy for Research, Al-Zahra Institute of Higher Education (S), Gorgan

What is the Resurrection (Ma’ad) and what is the necessity of its existence? The Resurrection, as one of the important and fundamental concepts in Islamic beliefs, has not only been emphasized in the Quran and hadiths, but scholars have also discussed it in detail; The Resurrection refers to the eternal life of man after death and gives meaning to the court of divine justice in which human actions and behavior are measured; now we will examine it further: Ma’ad (the Resurrection) literally means return.[1] In another definition, Ma’ad is a noun that means return and points out that this word can be used as a place name or a time name. [2] The term refers to a return to a world beyond the natural world. [3] In another definition, it is stated that the presence and existence of bodies for the second time and the return after death is called Ma’ad. [4] In this way, Ma’ad refers to a world beyond this material world, where the court of divine justice is established, and belief in Ma’ad means belief in the divine court; [5] the late Misbah, in explaining the meaning of Ma’ad, stated that the belief in the resurrection of a person who has passed away in the hereafter means belief in the eternal life of man. [6] The existence of the Resurrection (Ma’ad) is proof that creation is not in vain; Allah says: "Did you think that We created you without purpose and that you would not return to Us?" [7] Based on this verse, the proof that creation is not in vain is the existence of the resurrection and return to Allah. Another reason for the necessity of the resurrection is divine justice; given that some of Allah's servants are obedient and some are disobedient, Allah's behavior towards them can be imagined in several ways: either He rewards both groups, or He punishes both, or He leaves both. Since all three of these cases are contrary to divine justice, the only remaining way is for Allah to punish the disobedient servants and reward the obedient servants. Therefore, there must be another world in which Allah, in His justice, rewards and punishes His servants. [8] The late Bahrani says in this regard: We observe that both obedient and disobedient individuals die without receiving the reward and punishment they deserve; therefore, if they do not return to the Day of Judgment to receive reward and punishment, this means completely ignoring the concept of reward and punishment. [9] This rational reason is expressed in the divine word as follows; “Shall We treat those who believe and do righteous deeds as those who cause mischief on earth, or the righteous as those who do evil?” [10] Another important reason for the necessity of the Resurrection is that the Resurrection is the manifestation of the fulfillment of the promises of Allah Almighty. Allah has promised rewards to obedient servants in many verses, and undoubtedly keeping a promise is good, and breaking a promise is undesirable. Therefore, keeping a promise requires that the Resurrection will occur. [11] Sheikh Al-Tusi says in this regard: The necessity of fidelity to the promise, as well as wisdom, require that the Resurrection be necessary. [12] This rational reason is expressed in the divine word as follows: “Our Lord! You will surely gather all mankind on a Day about which there is no doubt; surely Allah does not break His promise.” [13] Conclusion Finally, the concept of Resurrection (Ma’ad) as a return to a world beyond the natural world is not only important religiously and religiously, but also rationally and philosophically; The Resurrection is the manifestation of divine justice and the fulfillment of Allah's promises to His servants; This belief in return and eternal life gives people hope and motivation to take the right path in the world and to engage in good deeds, because they know that Allah's reward and punishment await them; Therefore, resurrection not only has a profound impact on individual life, but also helps to establish justice and morality in society. [1] . Lisan al-Arab: Ibn Manzur, Vol. 3, p. 317. [2] . Minhāj al-Rashād fī Ma‘rifat al-Ma‘ād: Muḥammad Na‘īm, al-Ṭālaqānī, Vol. 1, p. 63. [3] . Taqrīrāt Falsafah Imām Khomeinī: Rūḥ Allāh, Khomeinī, Vol. 3, p. 589. [4] . Al-Ma‘ād Yawm al-Qiyāmah: ‘Alī Mūsā, al-Ka‘bī,Vol. 1, p. 10. [5] . Al-Ma‘ād wa ‘Ālam al-Ākhirah: Nāṣir, Makāram Shīrāzī, Vol. 1, p. 6. [6] . Āmūzish ‘Aqā’id: Muḥammad Taqī, Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, Vol. 1, p. 363. [7] . Al-Mu’minūn: 115. «أَفَحَسِبْتُمْ أَنَّمَا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ عَبَثًا وَأَنَّكُمْ إِلَيْنَا لَا تُرْجَعُونَ» [8] . Muḥāḍarāt fī al-Ilāhiyyāt: Shaykh Ja‘far, Subḥānī, Vol. 1, p. 399. [9] . Qawā‘id al-Marām fī ‘Ilm al-Kalām: Ibn Maytham, al-Baḥrānī, Vol. 1, p. 146. [10] . Saad: 28. «أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحاتِ كَالْمُفْسِدِينَ فِى الأَرْضِ* أَمْ نَجْعَلُ الْمُتَّقِينَ كَالْفُجَّارِ» [11] . Muḥāḍarāt fī al-Ilāhiyyāt: Shaykh Ja‘far, Subḥānī,Vol. 1, p. 400. [12] . Kashf al-Murād fī Sharḥ Tajrīd al-I‘tiqād: Abū Manṣūr Jamāl al-Dīn Ḥasan ibn Yūsuf ibn Muṭahhar, ‘Allāmah Ḥillī,Vol. 1, p. 405. [13] . Āl ‘Imrān: 9. «رَبَّنا إِنَّكَ جامِعُ النَّاسِ لِيَوْمٍ لا رَيْبَ فِيهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا يُخْلِفُ الْمِيعادَ»

Is believing in the Ahl al-Bayt's (AS) knowledge of the unseen considered ghulu? Given that the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) have described as exaggerators those who attribute things to them that they have not stated,[1] one of the challenging issues concerning the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is the affirmation of the knowledge of the unseen for them (AS). Initially, it should be stated that ghulu means excess and going beyond the limit, [2] and knowledge of the unseen (ilm al-ghaib) in the literal sense means knowing hidden things, [3] and in technical terms, it refers to awareness of hidden matters and things that are not perceivable by the senses. [4] Knowledge of the unseen is divided into two types based on who possesses it: Inherent and independent knowledge of the unseen: This refers to a type of awareness of the unseen that is not acquired from anyone else. This type of knowledge of the unseen is unlimited and is exclusive to Allah, and no one else shares this knowledge with Him. [5] Numerous Quranic verses mention this type of knowledge of the unseen: “Say: None in the heavens and earth knows the unseen except Allah, and they perceive not when they shall be raised.” [6] In another verse, it is stated from the Prophet (s): “And if I knew the unseen, I should have acquired much good, and no evil should have touched me. I am only a warner and a bringer of glad tidings to a people who believe.” [7] Shia scholars have also considered this type of knowledge exclusive to Allah, stating that some exaggerators (ghulat) and those who delegate authority (mufawwida) have attributed this type of knowledge of the unseen to the Infallible Imams (AS). [8] Acquired or dependent knowledge of the unseen: This is a type of awareness of the unseen that Allah has granted to some of His servants. [9] All Imami scholars believe that the awareness of the divine prophets and the Infallible Imams (AS) of the unseen is of this type, which is by Allah's permission and teaching, and they acquire this type of knowledge of the unseen from Allah in a limited manner. Some Quranic verses point to this type: “[He is] the Knower of the unseen, and He reveals to none His unseen, except to a messenger [whom] He has chosen…”[10] And based on the verse "I will inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses",[11] the ability to inform people of their hidden secrets by Jesus and his awareness of the unseen secrets was one of the miracles and signs of his truthfulness for his people. The knowledge of the unseen in narrations In the narrations issued by the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), these two types of knowledge of the unseen are also mentioned: One is the knowledge that only God knows, and the other is the knowledge that God taught to the angels and then to the Prophet (SAW) and his Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Asbagh ibn Nobata narrated that he said: I heard Amir al-Mu'minin (AS) say: "Allah has two kinds of knowledge; a knowledge that He has kept to Himself and has not made any of His prophets or any of His angels aware of it. And that is what Allah Almighty has said: ''Indeed, the knowledge of the Hour is only with Allah; He sends down the rain, and He knows what is in the wombs, and no one knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no one knows in what land he will die,''[12] and another knowledge that He has made His angels aware of, so whatever His angels have become aware of, Muhammad and his household have also become aware of, and whatever Muhammad and his household have become aware of, great and small among us have become aware of until the Day of Resurrection." [13] In another narration; Abi Basir, from Imam Sadiq (AS), narrated that he said: "God has two kinds of knowledge; a knowledge that no one knows except Him, and a knowledge that He has taught to His angels and Messengers. So whatever He has taught to His angels and Messengers, we (Ahl al-Bayt) know it." [14] Or when Amir al-Mu'minin informed about future events, one of Imam's companions said: O Amir al-Mu'minin, you have been given the knowledge of the unseen. The Imam smiled and said to that man, who was from the tribe of Kalb: O brother Kalbi, this is not the knowledge of the unseen, it is a knowledge that I have learned from the Prophet. The knowledge of the unseen is the knowledge of the Resurrection and of the matters that Allah Almighty has enumerated in His Book: "Allah is the one with the knowledge of the Resurrection, and He is the one who sends down the rain, and He knows what is in the wombs, and no one knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no one knows in what land he will die...". [15] Allah Almighty knows what is in the wombs: boy or girl, ugly or beautiful, generous or miserly, happy or unhappy, one who is fuel for Hell, or a companion of the Prophets in Paradise. This is the knowledge of the unseen, which none knows but Allah, and other than this is knowledge that Allah taught to His Prophet (SAW), who then taught it to me, and asked God for it to reside in my chest, and for my ribcage to contain it. [16] These narrations show that the Prophet's household (AS) had access to vast knowledge and are in the hierarchy of divine knowledge after Allah Almighty. This knowledge is in the possession of the Prophet's household (AS) until the Day of Judgment. Given the definition of the knowledge of the unseen (which is knowledge of hidden matters), it can be stated that the Ahl al-Bayt also knew the unseen; however, their knowledge was given by Allah, and it is a derived knowledge, dependent on God. It should be noted that the issue of the knowledge of the unseen concerning Prophets and saints is also widely discussed in Islamic narrations, and all Islamic sects have cited numerous examples of the knowledge of the unseen concerning the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) or their Imams and leaders. [17] Conclusion: Given that the knowledge of the unseen is of two kinds: an inherent and independent knowledge that is unique to Allah Almighty, and a derived and dependent knowledge that Allah has given to some of His saints. The knowledge of unseen matters for the Prophet (SAW) and his household (AS) is established with Allah's permission, and they do not have inherent knowledge and power, but whatever they have is from Allah. The verses and narrations that deny them the knowledge of the unseen also refer to the denial of inherent and independent knowledge of the unseen. Therefore, if the knowledge of the unseen of the Prophet's household means knowing hidden matters, this is established for the Prophet's household and is not ghulu (exaggeration). However, if the knowledge of the unseen means inherent and independent knowledge, which is specific to Allah Almighty, such an attribution is considered ghulu. [1] . Usul al-Kafi: Al-Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub, vol. 2, p. 75. [2] . Kitab al-'Ayn: Al-Farahidi, Khalil ibn Ahmad, vol. 4, p. 446. [3] . Al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran: Al-Raghib al-Isfahani, Abu al-Qasim al-Husayn ibn Muhammad, p. 616. [4] . Al-Ghadir: Allamah Amini, vol. 5, p. 52. [5] . Awa’il al-Maqalat fi al-Madhahib wa al-Mukhtarat: Sheikh al-Mufid, p. 67. / Jidal Ahsan; Naqd wa Barrasi Shubuhat Wahabiyan: Ja’far Subhani, p. 98. [6] . An-Naml: 65. «قُلْ لا یَعْلَمُ مَنْ فِی السَّماواتِ وَ الْأَرْضِ الْغَیْبَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ وَ ما یَشْعُرُونَ أَیَّانَ یُبْعَثُونَ» [7] . Al-A’raf: 188. «وَ لَوْ کُنْتُ أَعْلَمُ الْغَیْبَ لَاسْتَکْثَرْتُ مِنَ الْخَیْرِ وَ ما مَسَّنِیَ السُّوءُ إِنْ أَنَا إِلاَّ نَذِیرٌ وَ بَشِیرٌ لِقَوْمٍ یُؤْمِنُونَ» [8] . Awa’il al-Maqalat fi al-Madhahib wa al-Mukhtarat: Sheikh al-Mufid, p. 67. [9] . Jidal Ahsan; Naqd wa Barrasi Shubuhat Wahabiyan: Ja’far Subhani, p. 100. / Awa’il al-Maqalat fi al-Madhahib wa al-Mukhtarat: Sheikh al-Mufid, p. 313. [10] . Al- Jinn: 26-27. «عَالِمُ الْغَيْبِ فَلا يُظْهِرُ عَلَى غَيْبِهِ أَحَدًا * إِلاَّ مَنِ ارْتَضَى مِن رَّسُولٍ» [11] . Al-Imran: 49. «وَ أُنَبِّئُکُمْ بِمَا تَأْکُلُونَ وَ مَا تَدَّخِرُونَ فِی بُیُوتِکُمْ» [12] . Al-Luqman: 34. «إِنَّ اللَّهَ عِنْدَهُ عِلْمُ السَّاعَةِ وَيُنَزِّلُ الْغَيْثَ وَيَعْلَمُ مَا فِي الْأَرْحَامِ وَمَا تَدْرِي نَفْسٌ مَاذَا تَكْسِبُ غَدًا وَمَا تَدْرِي نَفْسٌ بِأَيِّ أَرْضٍ تَمُوتُ» [13] . Basa’ir al-Darajat: Al-Saffar, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan, p. 131. [14] . Ibid. [15] . Al-Luqman: 34. «إِنَّ اللَّهَ عِنْدَهُ عِلْمُ السَّاعَةِ وَيُنَزِّلُ الْغَيْثَ وَيَعْلَمُ مَا فِي الْأَرْحَامِ وَمَا تَدْرِي نَفْسٌ مَاذَا تَكْسِبُ غَدًا وَمَا تَدْرِي نَفْسٌ بِأَيِّ أَرْضٍ تَمُوتُ» [16] . Nahj al-Balagha: Sayyid Razi, Sermon: 128. [17] . Payam-e Quran: Nasser Makarem Shirazi, vol. 7, p. 237.

What is the Shiite scholars' view on "ghulu"? Among the discussions related to religious beliefs, especially in Shia Islam, the topic of "ghulu" has always been raised. Ghulu means exaggeration and exceeding moderation regarding the status and rank of the Infallible Imams (AS). However, the important point is that ghulu has two main types: ghulu in essence and ghulu in attributes. Ghulu in essence: Ghulu in essence means that a person or group believes in the prophethood of the Infallible Imams (AS) or the divinity of the Infallible Imams (AS), or incarnation, or transmigration, or Tafwidh (delegation); in other words, it raises the essence of the Infallible Imams (AS) above their level.[1] Ghulu in attributes: "Ghulu in attributes," which can also be described as "ghulu in virtues," refers to incorrectly attributing qualities, virtues, and miracles to the Infallible Imams (AS) they did not possess. Unlike ghulu in essence, which Shiite theologians and jurists unanimously consider to be kufr (disbelief), there is a difference of opinion among them regarding ghulu in attributes, and in fact, this issue has become a relative issue. [2] Many Shiite scholars and researchers have not specifically addressed this distinction. While this distinction has very important implications in jurisprudence, rijāl (knowledge of hadith narrators), and drayah (understanding and interpretation of hadiths). In fact, when we separate these two types of ghulu, we arrive at a more accurate understanding of the Shiite scholars' view on ghulu. Many Shiite scholars, when they speak of "ghulu," mean ghulu in essence, not ghulu in attributes, which are often confused in common conceptions. Great Shia scholars, such as Sheikh Mufid and Allama Hilli, when speaking of Ghulat, mostly referred to ghulu in essence. For example, Sheikh Mufid considers Ghulat to be those who attribute divinity and prophethood to the Imams and ascribe to them virtues beyond their limits. He considers Ghulat to be infidels and misguided and emphasizes that Imam Ali (AS) punished them. [3] Allama Hilli also considers the belief of Ghulat to be invalid, because he believes that God is not a body and cannot incarnate in a body. He also considers the miracles of the Imams to be similar to the miracles of other prophets and considers this as proof of refuting their divinity. [4] The late Sheikh Saduq also said about the Ghulat: Our belief is that the Ghulat and Mufawwida are infidels towards Allah Almighty and are worse than Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Qadariyya, and Haruriyya, and all innovators and those who follow their whims, and they have not belittled anything like Allah Almighty. [5] Allama Majlesi says about ghulu: Note that exaggeration regarding the Prophet (saw) and the Imams (as) means either believing in their divinity, or considering them partners with God in worship, creation, and provision. Belief in any of these is a type of atheism, infidelity, and departure from religion. [6] While all Shia theologians and jurists unanimously consider ghulu in essence to be infidelity and consider those who believe in it to be infidels, the issue of ghulu in attributes is much more complex and a subject of disagreement. In reality, the issue of ghulu in attributes has become a relative matter; meaning that each theologian, based on his specific theological viewpoint, believes in a certain degree of attributes and virtues for the Infallibles (AS). Therefore, if a theologian believes that the Infallibles (AS) possess a specific degree of attributes and virtues, he does not consider believing in exceeding that limit permissible and accuses those who believe in it of exaggeration. On the other hand, another theologian who believes in a higher degree of attributes and virtues for the Infallibles (AS) not only does not consider himself an exaggerator but also accuses his counterpart of negligence and deficiency in understanding and knowing the high status of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and considers him guilty. These disagreements show that the boundary between respecting and venerating the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and exaggeration is a relative line and depends on the viewpoint and theological foundations of each individual. In other words, regarding the attributes and virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), there is no absolute and definitive criterion to definitively determine which belief is ghulu and which is negligence; rather, it is a broad spectrum where each individual, based on their level of understanding and belief, finds their place. As a result, what seems like ghulu to one person may be the truth and knowledge to another, and vice versa. This relativity in understanding the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) shows that the issue of exaggeration has transcended a purely theological ruling and become a cognitive and cultural challenge. The disagreement over the permissibility of "the Prophet's (saw) error" was one of the most prominent disagreements between two Shiite intellectual schools, namely the Qum school and the Baghdad school; a clear example of the issue of ghulu in attributes. Shaykh Saduq, a prominent figure of the Qum school, quoting his teacher Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Hasan ibn Walid, considered the first sign of exaggeration to be the belief in the negation of error from the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and the Imams (AS). [7] From his perspective, those who elevate the status of infallibility to the point of not allowing any kind of mistake for the Infallibles (AS) have, in fact, fallen into exaggeration. In contrast, Shaykh Mufid, one of the great figures of the Baghdad school, states that if Shaykh Saduq's quote from his teacher is correct, regarding those who deny error from the Infallibles (AS) being exaggerators, then he himself is at fault, even if he is from the scholars of Qum. [8] Shaykh Mufid goes further and points to some of the beliefs of the people of Qum, accusing them of negligence in religion. He says that he encountered a group of people from Qum who downgraded the Imams (AS) from their true position and believed that the Imams (AS) were unaware of many of the religious laws and gained knowledge of them after deep thought and contemplation. Some of them even believed that the Imams (AS) resorted to opinion and conjecture to obtain the ruling of the Sharia. Shaykh Mufid considers these views to be clear negligence and believes that this group of scholars fell short in recognizing the position and status of the Imams (AS). [9] Ultimately, Sheikh Mufid considers the criterion of ghulu to be the denial of the created attributes (being created) of the Imams (AS) and the attribution of divinity and eternity to them. Instead of focusing on the issue of error or lack thereof, he emphasizes that exaggeration means denying the humanity of the Infallibles (AS) and attributing divine attributes to them. [10] These disagreements show that the understanding and interpretation of the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) throughout history has always been a subject of discussion and exchange of views, and each intellectual group, based on its own theological foundations and viewpoints, has arrived at a specific definition of exaggeration and fault. Conclusion: Therefore, the scholars' views on ghulu in essence differ from ghulu in attributes; all Shiite theologians and jurists unanimously consider ghulu in essence to be disbelief and declare those who hold it to be disbelievers, while the issue of ghulu in attributes (exaggeration in expressing their virtues and abilities) is much more complex and a subject of disagreement. In fact, the issue of ghulu in attributes has become a relative matter; meaning that each theologian, according to his specific theological viewpoint, believes in a certain limit of attributes and virtues for the Infallibles (AS). [1] . Jaryan Shenasi Ghulu (1): Safari, Nematollah, p: 7. [2] . Ibid. p: 10. [3] . Tas’hih E’teqadat al-Imamiyya: Sheikh Mofid, vol. 1, p. 131. [4] . Anwar al-Malakut fi Sharh al-Yaqut: Allameh Helli, vol. 1, p. 201. [5] . Al-E’teqadat: Sheikh Saduq, vol. 1, p. 97. [6] . Bihar al-Anwar: Mohammad-Taghi, Allameh Majlesi, vol. 25, p. 346. [7] . Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih: Sheikh Saduq, vol. 1, p. 360. [8] . Moghayesei Miyan Do Maktab Fekri Shi’a dar Qom va Baghdad dar Qarn-e Chaharom-e Hejri (A comparison between two Shiite schools of thought in Qom and Baghdad in the fourth century AH): Yaqub, Jafari, p. 30. [9] . Tas’hih E’teqadat al-Imamiyya: Sheikh Mofid, vol. 1, p. 135. [10] . Ibid. p: 136

What is the difference between Ghulu regarding the status of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and the correct belief in it? To understand the difference between exaggeration (ghulu) and the true belief in the status of Ahl al-Bayt (AS), it’s important to define ghulu. Linguistically, ghulu means to exceed limits or to go beyond moderation.[1] In a more technical sense, Sheikh Mufid described ghulu as exceeding boundaries and exaggerating concerning prophets and imams. [2] Imam Baqir (AS) further clarified this concept by stating that a ghali is someone who claims something about us that we have not asserted about ourselves. [3] It should be noted that the ghulu discussed in jurisprudential and theological texts refers to certain false beliefs held by some individuals, which lead to their classification as disbelievers. These beliefs include considering the Holy Prophet and the Imams (AS) to be God, believing that the Imams can also be prophets, or claiming that love for the Ahl al-Bayt negates the need for worship and the avoidance of sins. Such beliefs are examples of shirk (polytheism) or a denial of a fundamental principle, both of which result in disbelief.[4] In contrast, matters such as the Imams' knowledge of the unseen, the Ahl al-Bayt's wilayah at-takwiniyyah, their pure nature and creation, etc., have been continuously discussed in reliable books of Kalam, and in accordance with the hadith of Imam Ali (AS), who said: “Beware of exaggeration concerning us. Say that we are God’s servants, and say whatever you wish about our virtues,” [5] a limit has been set for it, and they have warned against attributing matters that contradict the principles of religion. These points make it clear that although the status of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is highly honorable, and no matter what we say or think about them, we will not reach the essence of their being and exalted status, but we should not raise them above the level of servitude, being created, and being dependent on God, and attribute to them qualities that contradict the necessities of religion. [6] Therefore, the difference between ghulu and the correct belief in the status of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) depends on a correct understanding of their position and the extent of belief in their status. Imam Reza (AS) also explained that the meaning of people's servitude to Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is that people must obey us because God has made this obedience obligatory. [7] When Imam Reza (AS) noticed that some people attributed the attributes of God to Imam Ali (AS), he said that the Commander of the Faithful ate, drank, and married like you, therefore, one cannot imagine divine attributes for him. [8] Also, Sudayr narrates that Imam Sadiq (AS) entered the session in an angry state and said that people think we have knowledge of the unseen, while no one but Allah has knowledge of the unseen. Sudir says that I told Imam Sadiq (AS) that we know you have a lot of knowledge, but we do not attribute the knowledge of the unseen to you; the Imam, explaining his knowledge, said: The person who had knowledge of the book with him and brought the throne of Bilqis in the blink of an eye had as much knowledge as a drop in the sea, and now, is someone who has some knowledge of the book wiser, or someone who has all the knowledge of the book? Then the Imam pointed to his chest and said that all the knowledge of the book is with us. [9] Thus, it becomes clear that when the Imam denies knowledge of the unseen, he does not mean the extraordinary knowledge that he himself possesses, but rather refers to a specific knowledge that is unique to God and is referred to as inherent and independent knowledge, but he considers the extraordinary knowledge given to him by Allah to be proven for himself. Considering what has been revealed to us from the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), it can be said that the Ghulat are those who believe in the prophethood of the Ahl al-Bayt, the transmigration of the souls of the Imams, the granting of independence to them, and divine attributes for them, and some even believe in the divinity of the Ahl al-Bayt. [10] Conclusion: Considering all these points, we understand that the Imams (AS) have virtues and characteristics that are unimaginable for humans. These virtues are beyond ordinary humans, but it must be emphasized that these characteristics are different from the attributes of Allah, and divine attributes cannot be attributed to them. Imam Sadiq (AS) also considers the knowledge of the unseen to be exclusive to Allah, but he sets limits for his own knowledge that seems beyond human understanding. Therefore, the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) are superior beings, while they always count as servants of Allah, and this is the correct belief about them. Considering these points, the difference between exaggeration and the correct view lies in the correct understanding of the position of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and precisely identifying the essence of exaggeration. [1] . Al-Nihayah fi Gharib al-Hadith wal-Athar: Majd al-Din Ibn al-Athir, vol. 3, p. 382. / Lisan al-Arab: Ibn Manzur, vol. 15, p133. [2] . Tasheeh al-I’tiqad: Sheikh Mufid, p: 131 [3] . Al-Kafi: Muhammad ibn Ya’qub al-Kulayni, vol.2, p.75. [4] . Wilayah Takwini wa Wilayah Tashri’i: Sheikh Lotfollah Safi Golpayegani, p 41. [5] . Al-Khisal: Sheikh al-Saduq, vol. 2, page: 614. And the words of Imam Sadiq (AS): “Make us created servants, and say about us what you wish except for prophethood.” Alkharayij w aljarayih: Al-Rawandi, Qutb al-Din, Vol: 2, P: 735. [6] . Farhang-e Ghadir: Javad Mohaddesi, Publisher: Qom: Ma’ruf, 1387, p: 448. [7] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh al-Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub, Vol. 1, p. 187. [8] . Bihar al-Anwar: Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi, vol. 25, p. 275. [9] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh al-Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub, vol. 1, p. 257. [10] . Buhuth fi Sharh al-'Urwa al-Wuthqa: al-Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr, vol. 3, p. 306 / Ghulu; Haqiqat wa Aqsam-e An: Seyyed Kamal Heydari, translated by Pajouheshkadeh Hajj va Ziarat, pp. 27-42 / Naqsh-e Ghulu dar Inhiraf-e Aqa’id va Afkar: Muhammad Helli, p. 31 / Ghulu va Tafviz dar Gostareh-ye Ayat va Rivayat-e Ahl al-Bayt (as): Seyyed Alireza Mousavi, p. 12.

What is the view of other Islamic schools of thought on Ghulu? The issue of Ghulu is one of the challenging issues in the Islamic world; the theorists of Islamic schools of thought have mentioned many things regarding Ghulu, each of which is of particular importance; now we will address some of the theories presented on the issue of Ghulu from the perspective of other Islamic schools of thought. The Zaydi view on Ghulu: The Zaydi school, like other branches of Shia, believes that Imam Ali (AS) was appointed as the successor of the Messenger of Allah (SAW), and after him, Imam Hassan and Imam Hussein (AS) were also recognized as the Imam and successor of the Prophet (SAW) by divine text. However, after Imam Hussein (AS), the Zaydis separated the position of guardianship and succession of the Prophet (SAW) from the divine and heavenly aspects and turned it into a worldly position. From the Zaydi point of view, the Imams after Imam Hussein (AS) must be knowledgeable, just, courageous, and managerial personalities, and from the lineage of Lady Fatima (SA), with active presence in the political arena, to command good and forbid evil and to implement divine laws. Among them, Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussein is known as a prominent figure in this lineage. During a period when the Zaydi ideology was based on the belief in knowledgeable, just, courageous, and capable Imams, a group of Zaydi Ghulat engaged in Ghulu and considered some of the Zaydi Imams as the Mahdi and possessors of long life. They attributed great miracles to these Imams, and some even claimed that the rank of these Imams was higher than that of the Prophet himself;[1] These extremist ideas caused some Zaydi scholars to consider these beliefs incorrect and beyond the truth and to write treatises refuting these beliefs. [2] In the end, it must be said that the Zaydi view on Ghulu is similar to that of the Imamiyyah, and Ghulu is considered an encroachment on right and truth, which is a condemned matter, and throughout history, Zaydi scholars have fought against it; although there may be differences between Zaydis and Imamis in the instances of Ghulu. The Ismaili view on ghulu: Like other Islamic sects, Ismailis define ghulu as exceeding the truth and reality. Among the great figures of the Ismaili faith, is Qadi Nu'man ibn Muhammad, whom Ibn Khallikan described as possessing immense greatness, was known as a highly learned and virtuous individual. He was not only proficient in the Quran and its interpretation but also specialized in jurisprudence and juristic disputes. He also possessed extensive knowledge of linguistics, poetry, and history, acting with wisdom and fairness in all these fields. Qadi Nu'man wrote numerous works about the Ahl al-Bayt and authored a valuable book on their virtues. He also wrote works refuting the beliefs of opponents, including Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi'i, and Ibn Sarij.[3] Qadi Nu'man explicitly states that Amir al-Mu'minin Ali (AS) resisted groups that exaggerated about him and presented him as exceeding reality. Some of these individuals believed that Ali (AS) was a prophet and that Gabriel had mistakenly revealed the revelation to the Prophet (SAW). Such beliefs were incorrect and extreme, and Amir al-Mu'minin Ali (AS) always opposed such ideas. [4] According to Ismaili's teachings, any exaggeration and transgression of the truth regarding persons and things is considered undesirable. The only difference in this regard lies in the differing understanding of the instances of exaggeration. These differences have led some sects to accuse other groups of ghulu. In reality, the difference in understanding and interpreting the instances of ghulu has led to diversity and conflict in religious viewpoints. The Sunni view on ghulu: Regarding the Sunni viewpoint, it should be said that Sunnism is internally divided into various groups in terms of jurisprudence, theology, and beliefs, some of which will now be mentioned: Ibn Taymiyyah and his followers throughout history: Ibn Taymiyyah al-Harrani, the founder of Wahhabism, says: "Ghulu" means praising or blaming something more than it deserves;[5] Muhammad Rashid Rida also mentions in his commentary that "ghulu" means exceeding the legal limit and exceeding what the Shari'ah has stipulated. [6] One of the reasons Wahhabi and Salafist theorists often label Shias as disbelievers is the concept of "ghulu." These individuals highlight certain Shia beliefs and associate them with "ghulu" to justify their claims. For instance, the belief that the Infallible Imams (AS) possess knowledge of the unseen is frequently categorized as "ghulu." Consequently, they argue that this belief warrants declaring Shias as disbelievers. In the following sections, we will present various opinions on this topic. Al-Zarqawi, in one of his works, accuses Shias of believing in the Imams’ knowledge of the unseen. He claims that this belief is part of the corrupt ideas held by Shia Muslims. [7] By citing the Shia belief that Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS) possesses knowledge of the unseen, he argues that Shias view the Imams (AS) as equal to Allah, [8] attributing divine status to them. Al-Zarqawi insists that such attributes are only appropriate for Allah Almighty and that assigning them to anyone other than Allah is akin to associating partners with Him. [9] Tartusi attributes such accusations to the Shia community, labeling them as part of the manifestations of Shia "ghulu". He cites numerous hadiths from Usul al-Kafi as evidence for his claims. In these hadiths, Shia beliefs assert that the infallible Imams (AS) possess knowledge of the unseen. [10] Due to this belief, Tartusi accuses them of disbelief and polytheism. He distinguishes between Shias and extreme Shias by stating that extreme Shias openly confess their belief in the divinity of individuals like Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS), while other Shias hold this belief secretly. [11] Traditional scholars, Sufi mystics from Ash'aris and Maturidis: Sunni scholars who lack Wahhabist thought have also identified Ghulat. For example, Shahrestani considers a Ghali to be someone who exaggerates about their Imam to the point of elevating them beyond the status of a creature, whether by ascribing divine attributes to them or claiming Allah's incarnation in them. [12] Abu’l-Baqā’, a Hanafi scholar, in his book "Al-Kulliyat," defines Ghulu as exceeding limits. [13] Baghawi, in his book "Sharh al-Sunnah," interpreting the verse "لَا تَغْلُوا فِي دِينِكُمْ"[14] states that Ghulu means exceeding the measure of a thing. [15] Mulla Ali Qari also defines Ghulu in religion as exceeding the Book and Sunnah.[16] Tabari,[17] Qastalani,[18] and Fakhr al-Razi also defined Ghulu as exceeding the limit or measure of a thing or matter.[19] Al-Alusi, in his abridgment of the book "Tuḥfat al-Ithna ‘Ashariyya," mentions that the first person to exaggerate about Ali ibn Abi Talib was Abdullah ibn Saba’, who affirmed Ali’s Imamate and disavowed his enemies.[20] Haytami, in "Şawā’iq al-Muhriqah," states that the nature of Shi’ism is Ghulu and innovation,[21] and it must be said that Sunnis consider the belief in the infallibility and Imamate of Amir al-Mu'minin to be Ghulu. However, Sunnis have gone so far in describing the virtues of the Companions that some have claimed that they had no shortcomings,[22] and they have described great miracles for them; for example, a story about a woman from the Ansar who dreamed that a date palm tree in her yard had fallen, and the Prophet (SAW) told her that her husband would die on his journey, but Abu Bakr gave her the good news that her husband would return that night, and in the end, this happened, and they explained the reason as follows: Allah was ashamed for a lie to come from the tongue of Abu Bakr; because he is Siddiq. [23] Conclusion: Based on the true and scholarly view of the Sunnis, Shi’ites cannot be considered Ghulat because the views of Sunni and Wahhabi scholars about Ghulu are similar to the views of Shi’ite scholars, who define Ghulu as exceeding the limit or measure of a thing or matter; therefore, exceeding the matter of religion, the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and the truth means Ghulu; whether this Ghulu is about the great figures of religion or other matters. However, differences in understanding the instances and accurately recognizing the position of Ghulu have led to some accusing the Shi’ites. [1] . Resaleh al-Zajereh article: Ali, Mousavi Nejad, Haft Aseman magazine, p. 2. [2] . Ibid: p. 3. [3] . Wafayat al-A’yan: Ibn Khalkan, vol. 5, p. 416. [4] . Da’a’im al-Islam: Qadi Nu’man Maghrebi, vol. 1, p. 48. [5] . Iqtida’ al-Sirat al-Mustaqim li Mukhalafat Ashab al-Jahim: Ibn Taymiyyah, vol. 1, p. 328. [6] . Tafsir al-Manar: Rashid Rida, Muhammad, vol. 6, p. 405. [7] . Articles by Ahmad Fadhil Nazal Al-Khalayleh, The comprehensive archive of the words and speeches of Sheikh Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Al-Buraq Islamic Network, vol. 1, p. 324. (هذا مع اعتقادهم العصمة في أئمتهم، ونسبة علم الغيب والتصرف في الكون إليهم، وغير ذلك من الشركيات التي لا يعذر أحد بجهلها) [8] . Ibid: vol. 1, p.532. (وَمِنْ جَرَائِمِهِمْ فِي جَانِبِ العَقِيدَةِ وَشَعَائِرِ الدِّينِ... أَنَّهُمْ نَشَرُوا العَقَائِدَ الفَاسِدَةَ... ثُمَّ قَالوا بِالرَّجعَةِ وَعِلمِ عَليٍّ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ لِلغَيبِ) [9] . Ibid: vol.1, p.587. (وَكَذَا شَرَّكُوا الإِلَهَ الوَاحِدَ بِالعِبَادِةِ المُستَحَقَّةِ للهِ تَعَالى وَحدَهُ غَيرَهُ، مِن نَذرٍ وَ دُعَاءٍ وَتَقَرُّبٍ بِالعِبَادَةِ للأَئِمَّةِ الذِينَ اعتَبَرُوهُم مُقَدَّسِينَ وَمَعصُومِينَ. وَ لم يَقِف الأَمرُ إِلى هَذَا الحَدِّ بَل نَسَبُوا الصِّفَاتِ التِي يَتَّصِفُ بِهَا اللهُ تَعَالى، كَالرِّزقِ وّالعِلمِ بِالغَيبِ وَنَحوَ ذَلِكَ لهَؤُلاءِ الأَئِمَّةِ، فَلم يَكتَفُوا بِالإِسَاءَةِ لمَقَامِ اللهِ تَعَالى بِالرُّبُوبِيَّةِ وَالأُلُوهِيَّةِ فَحَسب). [10] . Al-Shi’a al-Rawafid Ta’ifah Shirk wa Ridda (The Rawafid Shiites are a sect of polytheism): Abu Basir al-Tartousi, p. 32. [11] . Ibid: p. 45. [12] . Al-Milal wa al-Nihal: al-Shahrastani, vol. 1, p. 173. [13] . al-Kulliyyat: Abu al-Baqa, al-Kafwi, vol. 1, p. 293. [14] . An-Nisa: 171. [15] . Sharh al-Sunna: Abu Muhammad, al-Baghawi, vol. 4, p. 47. [16] . Mirqat al-Mafatih Sharh Mishkat al-Masabih: Mulla Ali al-Qari, vol. 1, p. 322. [17] . Tafsir al-Tabari: Abu Ja’far, Tabari, vol. 7, p. 700. [18] . Irshad al-Sari li Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari: Al-Qastalani, vol. 10, p. 313. [19] . Tafsir al-Razi = Mafatih al-Ghayb aw al-Tafsir al-Kabir: Fakhr al-Din, al-Razi, vol. 12, p. 411. [20] . Mukhtasar al-Tuhfa al-Ithna Ashariyah: Muhammad Shukri, al-Alusi, vol. 1, p. 6. [21] . al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa 'ala Ahl al-Rafd wa al-Dalal wa al-Zandaqa: al-Haytami, Ibn Hajar, vol. 1, p. 10. / Asma al-Matalib fi Sirat Amir al-Mu’minin Ali ibn Abi Talib: Ali Muhammad, al-Sallabi, vol. 1, p. 507. [22] . al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa 'ala Ahl al-Rafd wa al-Dalal wa al-Zandaqa: Ibn Hajar, Haytami, vol. 2, p. 640. [23] . Nuzhat al-Majalis wa Muntakhab al-Nafa’is: al-Safuri, vol. 2, p. 149.

What are the most well-known Ghulat sects in Islam? According to Shia scholars, Ghulat sects are excluded from Islam due to their claims of divinity for certain individuals or their assertions of prophecy for those who are not recognized as prophets. As a result, these groups cannot be considered Muslims, even if they identify themselves as Muslims or as Shia. The Ghulat sects that identify as Muslims or even Shia are numerous; for brevity, some will be briefly mentioned with explanations. The Rawandiyya (Abbassiyya) sect The Rawandiyya (Abbassiyya) sect was led by Abdullah Rawandi. Initially, he believed in the divinity of Mansur Dawaniqi, the Abbasid Caliph, and the prophethood of Abu Muslim Khorasani. However, after Mansur ordered the murder of Abu Muslim in 141 AH, the sect rebelled against Mansur. In response, Mansur charged them with heresy and had them burned. From the Rawandiyya sect, several offshoots emerged, including: - Abu Muslimiya, which believed in the imamate of Abu Muslim Khorasani; - Abu Hurrairyya, led by a man named Abu Hurraira; - Razzamiyya, followers of a figure named Razzam who believed in the incarnation of God in Abu Muslim; and - Hashemiyya, supporters of Abu Hashim Abdullah ibn Muhammad ibn Hanafiya.[1] The Khurramiyya sect The Khurramiyya were followers of Babak Khurramdin and were considered supporters of Abu Muslim Khorasani. Babak Khurramdin led a rebellion against the Abbasid Caliph in the year 201 AH. He was captured by the Iranian commander Afshin during the reign of Caliph Mu'tasim in 223 AH, and ultimately, he was executed after some time. [2] The Junahiyya sect The Junahiyya sect consisted of followers of Abdullah ibn Mu'awiya, whom they regarded as both God and a prophet. They believed that knowledge developed in his heart like a plant and that the spirit of God had been transferred to him. Additionally, they rejected the concept of resurrection, deemed the world indestructible, and considered what is typically forbidden to be permissible. [3] The Sabaiyya sect The Sabaiyya is a sect attributed to the Imamiyyah, led by Abdullah ibn Saba, which emerged in the early years of the Caliphate of Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS) and is considered a group of Ghalian. When Ali (AS) was martyred, the Sabaiyya said that he was not killed, but had gone into occultation and would return to fill the world with justice.[4] The Ahl al-Bayt (AS) cursed him. In a narration, Imam Sajjad (AS) says: "The mention of Abdullah ibn Saba was made to me, and all the hairs of my body stood on end. He claimed a great matter – may God curse him! By God! Imam Ali (AS) was a righteous servant of God and the brother of the Messenger of God (SAW), and he did not reach honor except because of his obedience to God and His Messenger." [5] The Karbiyya sect The Karbiyya are described as the followers of "Ibn Karb." He believed that Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya, nicknamed the Mahdi, was given this title by his father, Imam Ali (a.s.), that he did not die and would not die, and that his death was impossible, but that he is currently absent, and his location is unknown. He will appear and will be the owner of the earth, and there will be no Imam until his return. [6] The Bazighiyya sect Followers of Bazigh ibn Musa believe that Ja'far ibn Muhammad, also known as Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, is God. They hold that he is not merely the physical person people perceive but has taken this form to appear among humanity. The followers believe that whatever occurs in their hearts is a form of revelation, and if a person has faith, they will receive such revelations. [7] The Nusiriyya (Alawiyya) sect T The Nusiriyya was a group that initially believed in the Imamate of Imam Ali ibn Muhammad al-Hadi during his lifetime. However, they later deviated from this belief by claiming the prophethood of a man named Muhammad ibn Nusir al-Namiri. Muhammad ibn Nasir asserted that Imam Hadi (a.s.) had appointed him as a prophet. He also believed in the transmigration of souls related to Imam Hadi, claimed the Lordship of Imam Hadi, and permitted marriage between close relatives, among other beliefs. [8] Other sects such as: Kaysaniyya, the Kaysaniyya sect refers to the followers of Mukhtar ibn Abi Ubayda Thaqafi. [9] Khattabiyya, this sect is attributed to a person named Muhammad ibn Muqlas Asadi Kufi Ajda', a well-known as Abu al-Khattab; Ayatollah Khu'i (may God have mercy on him) referred to him as "لعنه الله" and "غال".[10] Umiriyya, which is attributed to a person named Aumayr ibn Bayan Ajli. [11] Secret Companions (Serriyya), Serri was one of the leaders of the Ghalat during the time of Imam Sadiq (AS), who was cursed by the Imam. [12] Bashariyya (Shu'ayriyya), this sect is attributed to Bashshar Shu'ayri, who lived during the time of Imam Sadiq and Imam Kazim (AS) and passed away in 180 AH. [13] The sects that have deviated from Islam due to Ghulu are numerous. Those interested in learning about them should refer to the books written on this subject.[14] [1] . Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah, p. 37. [2] . Ibid.: p. 38. [3] . Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan, vol. 1, p. 6. [4] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 22 / Many stories have been made about Abdullah bin Saba: Tarikh al-Tabari: al-Tabari, Ibn Jarir, vol. 3, p. 378. [5] . Ikhtiyār Ma’rifat al-Rijāl (Rijāl al-Kashshī):Al-Shaykh Al-Tusi, Volume: 1, Page: 324. [6] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 27. [7] . Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan, vol. 1, p. 12. [8] . Al-Ghaybah: Al-Shaykh Al-Tusi, Vol: 1, P. 398. / Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 93 / Syrian Alawites from Formation to Empowerment: Dr. Masoud Akhavan Kazemi; Sara Weisi, Shia Studies Quarterly, Pages 147 to 186, Year 10, Issue 38, Summer 1391. [9] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 23. [10] . Mu’jam Rijal al-Hadith: vol. 15, p. 271. [11] . Dā’irat al-Ma’ārif-e Bozorg-e Islāmī (The Great Islamic Encyclopedia): vol. 11, p. 314. [12] . Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa, p. 43. [13] . Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah, p. 111. [14] . Books such as Firaq al-Shī’a (Shiite sects): Nobakhti, Hassan bin Musa. / Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Musallīn (Articles on the Muslims and the Differences of the Muslims): Al-Ash'ari, Abu al-Hasan. / Ghāliān: Kāveshi dar jaryānhā va barāyandhā tā pāyān-e sadeh-ye sevom (Ghalian: An Investigation into the Currents and Results Until the End of the Third Century): Safari Furoshani, Nematullah.

How can Ghulu (exaggeration) be countered? Ghulu (extremism in religious beliefs) is a major problem that can cause religious and social harm in society. To counter this phenomenon, attention to Islamic teachings, the use of rational principles, and following the traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) offer effective solutions. In the following, methods of countering Ghulu will be discussed in simple language: 1. Following the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) as the best model The best way to counter Ghulu is to follow and act upon the sayings and behavior of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and to take them as role models. As the Prophet (SAW) said: “They are with the truth, and the truth is with them,”[1] Imam Ali (AS) says: No one from this Ummah can be compared to the Ahl al-Bayt of Muhammad (SAW), and no one whose blessings have been bestowed because of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) can ever be equated with them. They are the foundation of religion and the pillar of certainty. Whoever exaggerates must return to them, and whoever lags behind must join them. [2] Imam Reza (AS) also says: We, the family of Muhammad (SAW), are on the middle path, which the exaggerators do not comprehend and the laggards do not surpass. [3] Imam Baqir (AS) says: Go to the east and west; but you will not find correct knowledge except what comes from us, the Ahl al-Bayt. [4] Therefore, following and taking the Imams (AS) as role models will prevent believers from extremism and will guide them onto the “straight path.” 2. Correct religious education One of the most important ways to counter exaggeration is through principled and correct religious education. When people have a correct understanding of the fundamental beliefs and laws, they are less likely to fall into exaggeration or laxity. Imam Ali (AS) says: O people, the perfection of religion is in the pursuit of knowledge and acting upon it, and be aware that acquiring knowledge is more obligatory than seeking wealth. [5] Correct learning and understanding of religion can prevent individuals from falling into the trap of exaggeration. 3. Emphasis on Moderation and Balance The Holy Quran and the narrations of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) have always invited Muslims to moderation and balance in beliefs and actions; the holy Quran stated: "وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا",[6] And thus We have made you a middle nation; In explaining this verse, Imam Baqir (AS) says: We are the most moderate group, as Allah says in this verse: "وَ كَذلِكَ جَعَلْناکُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطاً"; he who has risen too high [gone beyond the truth] must return to us [who are in the middle], and he who has fallen behind must reach us. [7] This emphasis on "moderation" is the best approach to prevent exaggeration. Moderation in beliefs and lifestyle keeps Muslims from deviating towards extremism or laxity. 4. Scientific and Logical Criticism of Beliefs Paying attention to scientific criticism and logical analysis of beliefs is also very effective in confronting exaggeration; in the book Al-Fusul Al-Mukhtara by Al-Shaykh al-Mufīd, many discussions are presented about criticizing extremist beliefs and providing logical reasons for refuting them; [8] this approach helps clarify the truth and prevent misleading. 5. Warning and Caution against Exaggeration The Infallibles (AS) always explicitly warned people against falling into the trap of exaggeration. For example, Imam Ali (AS) said: "Two groups will be destroyed concerning me: one, enemies who will exaggerate in hatred and enmity, and the other, friends who will exaggerate in their love for me and go beyond the limit." [9] These words show that even love for the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) should not exceed the limits of moderation, as excessive love can also be harmful. In a narration from Imam Sadiq (AS), it is also mentioned that he forbade praying behind an exaggerator. [10] These prohibitions double the importance of knowing the correct path and acting in moderation. 6. Disavowal and Confrontation with Exaggerators In many cases, the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) even distanced themselves from exaggerators and explicitly expressed their disapproval of them. Imam Ali (AS) said: “O Allah, I hate the extremists, just as Jesus, son of Mary, hated the extremists among the Christians. O Allah, forsake them forever and do not help any of them!”[11] The other Imams of the Household of Prophethood also strongly rejected the exaggerators. [12] 7. The Role of Enemies in Creating Excess Some extremist and deviant currents stem from the plots of enemies to destroy the image of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). The enemies of religion, by fabricating exaggerated statements about the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and attributing them to the Imams (AS), sought to mislead people and distance them from the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Imam Reza (AS) clearly states: “Our opponents have fabricated stories about our virtues and categorized them into three types: first, exaggeration; second, laxity regarding our status; and third, a direct mention of the faults of our enemies. When people hear the exaggerations about us, they label our followers as infidels and accuse them of believing in our divinity. When they encounter the laxity, they begin to believe it applies to us. And when they hear explicit mention of our enemies’ faults, they insult us by name.” [13] Therefore, recognizing these plots and being aware of the source of extremist beliefs is another way to combat exaggeration. 8. Use of Media and Communication Tools In today's world, communication tools can play an important role in enlightenment and awareness. Publishing articles, holding discussion sessions, and using social networks to promote correct religious viewpoints can help reduce exaggeration, as the recommendation of the Holy Quran is the same; the Quran says in one place: "Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good counsel and argue with them in a way that is best;" [14] and in another place it says: "And there should be among you a group who invite to good, enjoin what is right, and forbid what is wrong. And it is they who are successful." [15] Conclusion In summary, by utilizing proper religious education, following the traditions of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), promoting moderation, scientific analysis, etc., we can avoid exaggeration and extremism in religious beliefs and move towards moderation and balance in religion, creating a balanced, aware society free from religious extremism and excess. [1] . Ali (AS) ma’a al-haqq wa al-haqq ma’a Ali (AS): Abū Ma’āsh, Sa’īd, Vol: 1, P: 51. [2] . Nahj al-Balagha: Imam Ali (AS), sermon 2. [3] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni Vol: 1 P: 101. [4] . Ibid.: P: 399. [5] . Tuḥaf al-'Uqūl: Ibn Sha'ba al-Hārānī, Vol:1, P:199. [6] . Al-Baqarah: 143. [7] . Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allameh al-Majlisi, Vol: 23, P: 349. [8] . Al-Fusul al-Mukhtara: Al-Shaykh al-Mufīd. [9] . Nahj al-Balagha: Imam Ali (AS), Hikmat 117. / Bihar al-Anwar: al-Allamah al-Majlisi; Vol: 34, P: 307. [10] . Tahdhib Al-Ahkam: Sheikh Tusi, Vol. 3, p. 31. [11] . Al-Amali: Sheikh Tusi Vol. 1 Page: 650. [12] . For further reading refer to the book "Ahlul Bayt (AS) in the Quran and Hadith" under the title “Ahlul Bayt’s Dislike of Exaggerators”: Ahlul Bayt (AS) in the Quran and Hadith: Mohammadi Rayshahri, Muhammad, Vol. 2, p. 810. [13] . Uyun Akhbar Al-Ridha (AS): Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 304. [14] . An-Nahl: 125. [15] . Al-Imran: 104

Does the narration 'Fatimah is a part of me' refer to the claim that Ali (AS) proposed marriage to the daughter of Abu Jahl? The narration 'Fatimah is a part of me' signifies that Fatimah Zahra (SA) is an inseparable part of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and is one of the most well-known hadiths about her status. This hadith is widely accepted and transmitted by all Islamic schools of thought.[1] Shia scholars, such as prominent figures like Shaykh Mufid, [2] Shaykh Tusi, [3] and Shaykh Saduq, [4] have transmitted this narration in their works, highlighting its significance and authenticity within the Shia tradition. This hadith has been narrated in various forms in both Sunni sources. However, in some Sunni sources like Sahih al-Bukhari, it is stated that Ali (AS), while married to Fatimah Zahra (SA), also proposed marriage to the daughter of Abu Jahl. When the Prophet (SAW) became aware of this, he declared from the pulpit: 'Fatimah is a part of me, and I dislike anyone harming her. By Allah, the daughter of the enemy of God shall not dwell in the same house as the daughter of the Prophet of God.'[5] Due to its contradiction with the noble character of Ali (AS) and his deep love for Fatimah (SA), this particular Sunni version has been criticized and examined by Shia scholars. Reasons for Rejecting this Narration: 1. Contradiction with Imam Ali’s Character: This narration contradicts the elevated character of Imam Ali (AS) and his loyalty to Lady Fatimah (SA). Imam Ali himself explicitly stated that he never caused any distress to Fatimah al-Zahra. “By Allah, I never made Fatimah angry or displeased until she left this world. Whenever I felt sorrowful, I would look at Fatimah’s face to alleviate my grief.” [6] 2. Weak chain of narration: The chain of transmission (isnad) for this narration has multiple weaknesses, and many scholars consider it unreliable. [7] When analyzing the narrative, we find elements that highlight the weaknesses and fragility of the story, such as: ᴏ Historical inconsistency: The only narrator who mentioned the marriage proposal incident is “Al-Miswar ibn Makhrama.” However, his timeline does not align with the event. Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani states that Al-Miswar was born two years after the Hijra, and he arrived in Medina in the eighth year after the conquest of Mecca. Thus, he could not have witnessed the event he narrated. [8] ᴏ Biased Narrator: Another point is Al-Miswar's enmity towards the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). The Khawarij had a good relationship with him and considered him one of their own. [9] He was a supporter of Mu'awiyah to the extent that whenever he heard Mu'awiyah's name, he would send blessings upon him. [10] This behavior indicates that his purpose in narrating this hadith was to tarnish the character of Imam Ali (AS). ᴏ The historical impossibility of the event: Juwayriya, the daughter of Abu Jahl, had not converted to Islam before the conquest of Mecca, and after embracing Islam, she married ʿAttāb ibn Asīd ibn Abī al-ʿĪṣ ibn Umayya. [11] 3. Attempt to tarnish the Ahl al-Bayt (AS): This narration was likely fabricated to defame the character of Imam Ali (AS); As Imam Sadiq (AS) indicated the story of Imam Ali (AS) proposing to Abu Jahl's daughter was fabricated by his opponents. "'Alqama, you cannot please everyone and silence every tongue. How can you remain safe from something that even prophets and saints were not safe from? Didn't they say about the Messenger of Allah (SAW) that he was a seeker of worldly gains and power? Didn't they attribute to Ali (AS) the desire to marry the daughter of Abu Jahl while he was already married to Fatimah (SA)?" [12] 4. The existence of this narration without mentioning the act of proposing marriage: This narration exists in Sunni sources without mentioning the event of Imam Ali (AS) proposing to the daughter of Abu Jahl, [13] which is similar to how Shia sources narrate this story. This itself is evidence that the event of the proposal is a fabricated story created to defame Imam Ali (AS) and diminish the significance of Fatimah's (SA) distress over Abu Bakr and Umar. [14] Conclusion: The narration "Fatimah is a part of me" is unrelated to the story of Ali's proposal to the daughter of Abu Jahl. Many scholars reject the account of this proposal due to its weak chain of transmission and its contradiction with Ali’s character. This event appears to have been fabricated to damage Imam Ali's (AS) reputation and to undermine the seriousness of Fatimah's (SA) grievances against Abu Bakr and Umar. [1] . Majmu’at al-Rasa’il: Al-Safi, Sheikh Lutfullah, Vol: 2 P: 312. [2] . Al-Amali: Sheikh Al-Mufid, Vol: 1, P: 259. «قَالَ سَمِعْتُ سَعْدَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ يَعْنِي ابْنَ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ص يَقُولُ‌ فَاطِمَةُ بَضْعَةٌ مِنِّي مَنْ سَرَّهَا فَقَدْ سَرَّنِي وَ مَنْ سَاءَهَا فَقَدْ سَاءَنِي فَاطِمَةُ أَعَزُّ الْبَرِيَّةِ عَلَيَّ.» [3] . Al-Amali - Dar Al-Thaqafah Edition: Sheikh Al-Tusi, Vol: 1, P: 24. [4] . Ilal Al-Shara'i': Sheikh Al-Saduq, Vol: 1, P: 185 and 186. [5] . Sahih Al-Bukhari: Al-Bukhari, Vol: 5, P: 22. [6] . Kashf Al-Ghummah fi Ma'rifat Al-A'immah: Al-Muhaddith Al-Irbili, Vol: 1, P: 352. «فَوَ اللَّهِ مَا اَغْضَبْتُهَا وَ لَا اَکْرَهْتُهَا عَلَی اَمْرٍ حَتَّی قَبَضَهَا اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ وَ لَا اَغْضَبَتْنِی وَ لَا عَصَتْ لِی اَمْراً وَ لَقَدْ کُنْتُ اَنْظُرُ اِلَیْهَا فَتَنْکَشِفُ عَنِّی الْهُمُومُ وَ الْاَحْزَان.» [7] . For more information, please refer to the article: The Legend of the Proposal of the Daughter of Abu Jahl by the Commander of the Faithful (AS). [8] . Al-Isabah fi Tamyiz Al-Sahaba: Al-Asqalani, Ibn Hajar, Vol: 6, P: 94. [9] . Si’ar A’lam al-Nubala: Al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din, Vol: 4, P: 414. «قَالَ الزُّبَيْرُ بنُ بَكَّارٍ: كانت تَغْشَاهُ، وَيَنْتَحِلُوْنَهُ» [10] . History of Islam - Tadmuri edition: Al-Dhahabi, Shams al-Din, Vol: 5, P: 246 «قَالَ عُرْوَةُ: فَلَمْ أَسْمَعِ الْمِسْوَرَ ذَكَرَ مُعَاوِيَةَ إِلا صَلَّى عَلَيْهِ». [11] . Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra: Ibn Saad, Vol: 8, P: 262. [12] . Amali: Sheikh al-Saduq, P: 165. «فَقَالَ علیه السلام: یَا عَلْقَمَةُ اِنَّ رِضَا النَّاسِ لَا یُمْلَکُ وَاَلْسِنَتَهُمْ لَا تُضْبَطُ وَکَیْفَ تَسْلَمُونَ مِمَّا لَمْ یَسْلَمْ مِنْهُ اَنْبِیَاءُ اللَّهِ وَرُسُلُهُ وَحُجَجُ اللَّهِ (علیهم‌السّلام).... اَ لَمْ یَنْسُبُوا سَیِّدَ الْاَوْصِیَاءِ (علیهم‌السّلام) اِلَی اَنَّهُ کَانَ یَطْلُبُ الدُّنْیَا وَالْمُلْکَ ...... اَ لَمْ یَنْسُبُوهُ اِلَی اَنَّهُ (علیه‌السّلام) اَرَادَ اَنْ یَتَزَوَّجَ ابْنَةَ اَبِی جَهْلٍ عَلَی فَاطِمَةَ (علیهاالسّلام) وَاَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ (صلی‌الله‌علیه‌و‌آله‌وسلّم) شَکَاهُ عَلَی الْمِنْبَرِ اِلَی الْمُسْلِمِینَ فَقَالَ اِنَّ عَلِیّاً یُرِیدُ اَنْ یَتَزَوَّجَ ابْنَةَ عَدُوِّ اللَّهِ عَلَی ابْنَةِ نَبِیِّ اللَّهِ اَلَا اِنَّ فَاطِمَةَ بَضْعَةٌ مِنِّی فَمَنْ آذَاهَا فَقَدْ آذَانِی وَمَنْ سَرَّهَا فَقَدْ سَرَّنِی وَمَنْ غَاظَهَا فَقَدْ غَاظَنِی.» [13] . Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: Ibn Abi Shaybah, Abu Bakr, Vol: 6, P: 38. [14] . Al-Imamah wal-Siyasah: Al-Dinawari, Ibn Qutaybah, Vol: 1, P: 31 / Sahih al-Bukhari: Al-Bukhari, Vol: 4, P: 79.

Did houses in Medina have doors during Rasulullah's time? In response to this question, it should be noted that houses typically had doors in the centuries and eras preceding the Prophet (SAW). This fact is evident not only in historical texts but also clearly mentioned in the Quran. For example, in the story of Prophet Joseph (Yusuf) and Zuleikha, the Quran indicates that Zuleikha closed the doors to conceal her intentions. [1] This demonstrates the existence of doors during that time. Quranic Evidence: During the time of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), houses in Medina did have fences and doors. The Quran mentions that if you have access to the keys of a house, you are allowed to take food from it. [2] Numerous narrations: Narrations that prove the existence of doors for people's houses during the time of the Prophet (SAW): For example, Sijistani narrated that the Prophet (SAW) instructed Umar to "Go and bring food for these people." The narrator recounts that Umar took them to a room, retrieved a key from his belt, and opened the door. [3] Additionally, in his book "Sahih Muslim," Muslim reported that the Prophet (SAW) commanded us to close the doors of our houses at night. [4] Narrations that prove the existence of a door for the house of the Prophet (SAW): Ibn Kathir al-Dimashqi writes: The rooms of the Prophet’s house were woven from ar’ar branches and wood with hair, and he cites from the history of Bukhari: The door of the Prophet's house had no doorknobs, and people would knock with their fingers or nails. [5] Bukhari also mentions in "Al-Adab al-Mufrad" that Muhammad ibn Hilal observed the houses of the Prophet's wives. He noted that their coverings were woven from hair. When I asked him about Aisha's house, he said, "The door of her house opened toward Damascus." I inquired whether it had one leaf or two. He replied that it had only one leaf, and when I asked about its material, he said it was made from the wood of the ar'ar tree or the sāj tree. [6] Imam Kazem (AS) narrates that on the night the Prophet passed away, he called Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husayn (AS) together, closed the door, and had a lengthy conversation with Fatimah. When it became quite late, Ali and his two sons came out of the house, waiting behind the door with the people. [7] In another narration, Imam Kazem (AS) reports that the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) gathered Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husayn (AS), closed the door behind them, and said: “O my family, those nearest to Allah! May the Lord send peace upon you…”[8] Narrations that prove the existence of a door for the house of Ali and Fatimah (AS): In the story of the marriage of Fatimah Zahra and the Commander of the Faithful (AS), it is mentioned that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) called Ali (AS) and performed the same act that he had done with Fatimah. Then he recited the same supplication for Ali that he had recited for Fatimah (SA). Then he said to Ali and Fatimah (AS): Get up and go to your house, may Allah make you kind to each other! And bless your offspring! And grant you a good end! The Messenger of Allah (SAW) got up after these supplications and closed the door of the house. [9] Muhammad ibn Jarir Tabari, a Shia scholar, also writes: Salman says, ‘I went to Fatimah’s house, knocked on the door, and obtained permission to enter. She allowed me to come in. When I entered, I saw her sitting.’ [10] Furthermore, in narrations that describe the incident of the attack on the house of Ali and Fatimah (AS), it is mentioned: ‘Umar said, ‘Let us go to her.’ Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn Walid, Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfah), Qunfudh, and I set out with them. When we reached the door, Fatimah saw them and closed the door in their faces. She had no doubt that they would not enter without her permission. However, Umar struck the door with his foot, breaking it. The door was made of palm.’ [11] Additionally, in another narration by Ibn Qutaybah, it is stated: 'Umar and a group with him arrived at Fatimah’s house. They knocked on the door, and when Fatimah heard their voices, she cried out: ‘O my father, O Messenger of Allah! After you, What injustices we have seen from Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafah!’[12] In conclusion, based on historical evidence and reliable narrations, it can be inferred that not only were the houses in Medina equipped with doors, but the houses of the Prophet (SAW) and Imam Ali and Lady Fatimah (AS) also had doors. [1] . Al-Yusuf: 23. (وَغَلَّقَتِ الْأَبْوَابَ) [2] . An-Nur: 61. (أَوْ مَا مَلَكْتُمْ مَفَاتِحَهُ) [3] . Sunan Abi Dawood: Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawood, Vol. 4, p. 360. [4] . Sahih Muslim: Muslim, Vol. 3, p. 1593. [5] . Al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya: Ibn Kathir, Vol. 3, p. 268. [6] . Al-Adab al-Mufrad with Annotations: Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, p. 416. Similar narrations are also mentioned: Samt al-Nujum al-Awali fi Anba’ al-Awail wal-Tawali: Al-Asami, Vol. 1, p. 367 / Tarikh Makkah al-Musharrafah wal-Masjid al-Haram wal-Madinah al-Sharifah wal-Qabr al-Sharif: Ibn al-Dhia, Vol. 1, p. 268. [7] . Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 22, p. 490. [8] . Ibid: Vol. 24, p. 219. [9] . Musannaf Abd al-Razzaq al-San’ani: Al-San’ani, Abd al-Razzaq, Vol. 5, p. 486 / Al-Mu’jam al-Kabeer: Al-Tabarani, Vol. 24, p. 132 / Sharh al-Akhbar fi Fada’il al-A’imma al-Athar: Al-Qadi al-Nu’man al-Maghribi, Vol. 2, p. 359 / Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 43, p. 122. [10] . Dalail al-Imamah: Al-Tabari al-Saghir, Muhammad ibn Jarir, Vol. 1, p. 107. [11] . Tafsir al-Ayyashi: Al-Ayyashi, Muhammad ibn Mas’ud, Vol. 2, p. 66 / Al-Ikhtisas: Al-Shaykh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 186 / Bihar al-Anwar: Al-Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 28, p. 227. [12] . Al-Imamah wal-Siyasah: Al-Dinawari, Ibn Qutaybah, Vol. 1, p. 30.

Is there any evidence in Shia sources regarding the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA)? There is authentic evidence in Shia sources regarding the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA) and her martyrdom, emphasizing the significant injustice she faced. For example, consider the following accounts: 1. Statement by Sulaym bin Qays (d. 76 AH) quoting Salman al-Farsi: "Fatimah (SA) said: 'O Umar, what is this between you and us?' He replied: ‘Open the door, or else we will set your house on fire!’ She responded, ‘O Omar, are you not afraid of Allah that you enter my house without permission?’ But Umar refused to turn back. Umar called for fire, ignited it at the door, then pushed it open and entered. Lady Fatimah confronted him, crying, ‘O father, O Messenger of Allah!’ Umar raised his sword, which was in its sheath, and struck Fatimah’s side. she cried out: 'O my father!' He then raised a whip and struck her arm. Lady Fatimah exclaimed, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what ill-treatment Abu Bakr and Omar, your companions, have shown us!’”.[1] 2. Statement by Muhammad bin Jarir bin Rustam Tabari (d. 310 AH): “The cause of Lady Fatimah’s death was the blows inflicted upon her. Qunfudh, Omar’s servant, struck her with the sheathed sword upon Omar’s command. As a result, her son Mohsen was miscarried, and she fell seriously ill. She did not allow any of her oppressors to visit her.” [2] He shared this story in another part of his book as well. [3] 3. Statement by Muhammad bin Mas’ud 'Ayyashi (d. 320 AH): "Umar said: 'Come with me to him.' So, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn al-Walid, al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim, (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfa), and Qunfuz, and I (the narrator) went together. When we approached Lady Fatimah’s house, she saw them and closed the door, as she did not doubt that they would not enter without her permission. Umar struck the door with his foot and broke it, as it was made of palm fronds. They entered and brought out Ali (AS)..." [4] 4. Statement by Sheikh al-Kulayni (d. 329 AH): Kulayni narrates a narration in Al-Kafi from Imam Kazim (AS) referring to Lady Fatimah (SA) as a martyr: “Indeed, Fatimah (SA) is truthful and a martyr…”[5] 5. Statement by Husayn ibn Hamdan Khasibi (d. 346 AH): From Lady Fatimah’s own words, Khasibi recounts the following incident: “Then they sent Qunfuz and Khalid ibn al-Walid to our house to bring out my cousin to the Saqifah of Bani Sa'ida for their harmful allegiance. And he would not go out to them, being occupied with the will of the Messenger of Allah (SAW)... So they gathered wood at our door and brought fire to burn the house. I held onto the doorpost and said, 'I beseech you by Allah and by my father, the Messenger of Allah (SAW), to cease and desist.' Then Umar took the whip from Qunfuz, the freed slave of Abu Bakr, and struck my arm with it, so that the whip twisted around my hand until it was like a bracelet. And he kicked the door with his foot and it struck me, and I fell on my face while I was pregnant, and the fire was blazing..." [6] 6. Statement by Muhammad ibn Qulawayh (d. 368 AH): Gabriel addressed the Prophet, saying: ‘"And as for your daughter, she will be wronged and deprived, and her rights which you have appointed for her will be taken from her by force. She will be beaten while she is pregnant, and people will enter her private house without permission. Then she will be treated with contempt and humiliation, and she will find no one to protect her. As a result of the beating, she will miscarry and die from it." [7] 7. Statement by Sheikh Saduq (d. 381 AH): The Messenger of Allah spoke about the events after his passing, saying: When I saw her, I remembered what would happen to her after my demise. It was as if I could see humiliation entering her house, her sanctity being violated, her rights being usurped, her inheritance denied, her side being broken and her unborn child miscarried. She would cry out, ‘O Muhammad!’ But no one would answer her call for help. She would seek assistance, but no one would come to her aid...... She would be the first from my household to join me, appearing before me as a grieving, oppressed, sorrowful, and martyred. At that moment, I would say, ‘O Allah, curse those who wronged her, punish those who seized her rights, humiliate those who oppressed her, and eternally condemn those who struck her side until she lost her child.’ And the angels would respond, ‘Ameen.’ [8] 8. Statement by Sheikh Mufid (d. 413 AH): "Umar said: 'Get up and go to Ali.' So, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid ibn al-Walid, al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, Salim, (the freed slave of Abu Hudhayfa), and Qunfuz, and I (the narrator) went together. Lady Fatimah suspected that they would not enter the house without permission. So, she closed and locked the door. When they reached the door, Umar struck the door with his foot and broke it, as it was made of palm. They entered and forcibly dragged Ali out, and Lady Fatimah followed." [9] This incident is also mentioned elsewhere. [10] 9. Statement by Muqatil ibn Atiyya (d. 505 AH): "After Abu Bakr had forcefully taken the allegiance of the people through intimidation, the sword, threats, and coercion, he sent Umar, Qunfuz, Khalid ibn al-Walid, Abu Ubaidah al-Jarrah, and a group of hypocrites to the house of Ali and Fatimah. Umar gathered firewood at the door of Fatimah's house and set it on fire. When Fatimah came to the door to repel Umar and his companions, Umar squeezed Fatimah between the wall and the door with such force that she miscarried her child and the nail of the door pierced her chest. Fatimah cried out, 'O my father, O Messenger of Allah! Look what we have suffered after you from the son of Khattab and the son of Abu Quhafa!' Umar turned to those around him and said, 'Strike Fatimah!' So, they rained blows upon the beloved of the Messenger of Allah and his daughter until they bruised her body." [11] 10. Statement by Abu Mansur Tabarsi (d. 6th century AH): Tabarsi recounts the dialogue between Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (AS) and Mughira (may Allah curse him), where the martyrdom of Lady Fatimah (SA) is explicitly mentioned: “You are the one who beat and injured Fatimah (SA) until she miscarried her child. Your actions were due to your opposition to the Messenger of Allah (SAW), your defiance of his command, and your violation of his sanctity.” [12] 11. Statement by Allama Hilli (d. 726 AH): And among these [events] is that he and Umar sought to burn the house of the Commander of the Faithful, in which were the Commander of the Faithful, Fatimah, their children, and a group of the Banu Hashim, who had not pledged allegiance to Abu Bakr and had opposed it. Tabari mentioned in his history, saying: 'Umar ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Ali and said, "By Allah, I will surely burn you all or you will come out to pledge allegiance." [13] 12. Statement by Allama Majlisi (d. 1110 AH): “When the rulers seized power and usurped the caliphate, most people pledged allegiance to them. They sent someone to Ali (AS) to force him into allegiance. He refused, so Umar sent fire to burn down their house. They intended to enter by force, but Fatimah blocked the door. Qunfuz, a slave of Umar, struck the door on Fatimah's abdomen, breaking her side and causing her to miscarry the child whom the Messenger of Allah (SAW) had named Muhsen. As a result, she fell ill and died." [14] This incident is also mentioned in Bihar al-Anwar. [15] Conclusion: Based on numerous and reliable Shia sources, the incident of the attack on the house of Lady Fatima (SA) is well-established and historically verified among Shia Muslims. Sayyid Murtadha (d. 436 AH) affirms that there is a significant abundance of narration chains regarding the martyrdom of Lady Zahra (SA). [16] Sheikh Tusi (d. 460 AH) also considers the attack on Lady Fatima Zahra's (SA) house to be well-known and states that there is no disagreement among Shia scholars on this matter. [17] Furthermore, Allama Majlesi (d. 1110 AH) regards the reports of the attack on the house and the martyrdom of Lady Fatima (SA) as widely accepted. [18] [1]. Kitab Sulaym ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Sulaym bin Qais, p. 150. «فقالت فاطمة عليها السلام : يا عمر ، ما لنا ولك ؟ فقال : افتحي الباب وإلا أحرقنا عليكم بيتكم . فقالت : يا عمر ، أما تتقي الله تدخل علي بيتي ؟ فأبي أن ينصرف . ودعا عمر بالنار فأضرمها في الباب ثم دفعه فدخل فاستقبلته فاطمة عليها السلام وصاحت: يا أبتاه يا رسول الله فرفع عمر السيف وهو في غمده فوجأ به جنبها فصرخت: يا أبتاه. فرفع السوط فضرب به ذراعها فنادت: يا رسول الله، لبئس ما خلفك أبو بكر وعمر.» [2]. Dalail al-Imamah: Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn Rustam Tabari, p. 134. «وَ كَانَ سَبَبُ وَفَاتِهَا أَنَّ قُنْفُذاً مَوْلَى عُمَرَ لَكَزَهَا بِنَعْلِ السَّيْفِ‏ بِأَمْرِهِ، فَأَسْقَطَتْ مُحَسِّناً وَ مَرِضَتْ مِنْ ذَلِكَ مَرَضاً شَدِيداً، وَ لَمْ تَدَعْ أَحَداً مِمَّنْ آذَاهَا يَدْخُلُ عَلَيْهَا.» Allama Mamaqani, one of the great scholars of Rijal, considers the chain of transmission of this narration to be authentic and strong in his book "Mara'a al-Kamal". Mara'a al-Kamal: Allama Mamqani, Abdullah, vol. 3, p. 267. [3]. Dalail al-Imamah: Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn Rustam Tabari, p. 104. [4]. Tafsir al-'Ayyashi: al-'Ayyashi, Muhammad ibn Mas’ud, Vol. 2, p. 66. «قال عمر: قوموا بنا إليه، فقام أبو بكر، و عمر، و عثمان و خالد بن الوليد و المغيرة بن شعبة، و أبو عبيدة بن الجراح، و سالم مولى أبي حذيفة، و قنفذ، و قمت معهم، فلما انتهينا إلى الباب- فرأتهم فاطمة ص أغلقت الباب في وجوههم، و هي لا تشك أن لا يدخل عليها إلا بإذنها، فضرب عمر الباب برجله فكسره و كان من سعف‌ ثم دخلوا فأخرجوا عليا ع ملببا......» [5]. Al-Kafi: al-Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub, Vol. 1, p. 458. [6]. Al-Hidayah al-Kubra: al-Khasibi, Husayn ibn Hamdan, Vol. 1, p. 178. «ثُمَّ يُنْفِذُونَ إِلَى دَارِنَا قُنْفُذاً وَ مَعَهُ خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ لِيُخْرِجَا ابْنَ عَمِّي إِلَى سَقِيفَةِ بَنِي سَاعِدَةَ لِبَيْعَتِهِمُ الْخَاسِرَةِ وَ لَا يَخْرُجُ إِلَيْهِمْ مُتَشَاغِلًا بِوَصَاةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَ آلِهِ).... فَجَمَعُوا الْحَطَبَ بِبَابِنَا وَ أَتَوْا بِالنَّارِ لِيُحْرِقُوا الْبَيْتَ فَأَخَذْتُ بِعِضَادَتَيِ الْبَابِ وَ قُلْتُ: نَاشَدْتُكُمُ اللَّهَ وَ بِأَبِي رَسُولِ اللَّهِ (عليه السلام) أَنْ تَكُفُّوا عَنَّا وَ تَنْصَرِفُوا فَأَخَذَ عُمَرُ السَّوْطَ مِنْ قُنْفُذٍ مَوْلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ، فَضَرَبَ بِهِ عَضُدِي فَالْتَوَى السَّوْطُ عَلَى يَدِي حَتَّى صَارَ كَالدُّمْلُجِ، وَ رَكَلَ الْبَابَ بِرِجْلِهِ فَرَدَّهُ عَلَيَّ وَ أَنَا حَامِلٌ فَسَقَطْتُ لِوَجْهِي وَ النَّارُ تَسَعَّرُ...» [7]. Kamil al-Ziyarat: Ibn Qulawayh, Ja’far ibn Muhammad, pp. 332. «وَ أَمَّا ابْنَتُكَ فَتُظْلَمُ وَ تُحْرَمُ وَ يُؤْخَذُ حَقُّهَا غَصْباً الَّذِي تَجْعَلُهُ لَهَا وَ تُضْرَبُ وَ هِيَ حَامِلٌ وَ يُدْخَلُ عَلَيْهَا وَ عَلَى حَرِيمِهَا وَ مَنْزِلِهَا بِغَيْرِ إِذْنٍ ثُمَّ يَمَسُّهَا هَوَانٌ وَ ذُلٌّ ثُمَّ لَا تَجِدُ مَانِعاً وَ تَطْرَحُ مَا فِي بَطْنِهَا مِنَ الضَّرْبِ وَ تَمُوتُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ الضَّرْبِ » [8]. Al-Amali Saduq: Ibn Babawayh, Muhammad ibn 'Ali, p. 176. «وَ أَنِّي لَمَّا رَأَيْتُهَا ذَكَرْتُ مَا يُصْنَعُ بِهَا بَعْدِي كَأَنِّي بِهَا وَ قَدْ دَخَلَ الذُّلُّ بَيْتَهَا وَ انْتُهِكَتْ حُرْمَتُهَا وَ غُصِبَتْ حَقَّهَا وَ مُنِعَتْ‏ إِرْثَهَا وَ كُسِرَ جَنْبُهَا [وَ كُسِرَتْ جَنْبَتُهَا] وَ أَسْقَطَتْ جَنِينَهَا وَ هِيَ تُنَادِي يَا مُحَمَّدَاهْ فَلَا تُجَابُ وَ تَسْتَغِيثُ فَلَا تُغَاثُ فَلَا تَزَالُ بَعْدِي مَحْزُونَةً مَكْرُوبَةً بَاكِيَةً … فَتَكُونُ أَوَّلَ مَنْ يَلْحَقُنِي مِنْ أَهْلِ بَيْتِي فَتَقْدَمُ عَلَيَّ مَحْزُونَةً مَكْرُوبَةً مَغْمُومَةً مَغْصُوبَةً مَقْتُولَةً فَأَقُولُ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ اللَّهُمَّ الْعَنْ مَنْ ظَلَمَهَا وَ عَاقِبْ مَنْ غَصَبَهَا وَ ذَلِّلْ مَنْ أَذَلَّهَا وَ خَلِّدْ فِي نَارِكَ مَنْ ضَرَبَ جَنْبَهَا حَتَّى أَلْقَتْ وَلَدَهَا فَتَقُولُ الْمَلَائِكَةُ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ آمِينَ.» [9]. Al-Ikhtisas: Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 186. «فَقَالَ عُمَرُ قُمْ إِلَى الرَّجُلِ فَقَامَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ وَ عُمَرُ وَ عُثْمَانُ وَ خَالِدُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ وَ الْمُغِيرَةُ بْنُ شُعْبَةَ وَ أَبُو عُبَيْدَةَ بْنُ الْجَرَّاحِ وَ سَالِمٌ مَوْلَى أَبِي حُذَيْفَةَ وَ قُمْتُ مَعَهُمْ وَ ظَنَّتْ فَاطِمَةُ ع أَنَّهُ لَا تُدْخَلُ بَيْتُهَا إِلَّا بِإِذْنِهَا فَأَجَافَتِ الْبَابَ‌ وَ أَغْلَقَتْهُ فَلَمَّا انْتَهَوْا إِلَى الْبَابِ ضَرَبَ عُمَرُ الْبَابَ بِرِجْلِهِ فَكَسَرَهُ وَ كَانَ مِنْ سَعَفٍ فَدَخَلُوا عَلَى عَلِيٍّ ع وَ أَخْرَجُوهُ مُلَبَّبَاً فَخَرَجَتْ فَاطِمَةُ» [10]. Al-Muqni’ah: Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 1, p. 459. [11]. Mutamar Ulama' Baghdad: Muqatil bin Atiyah, Vol: 1, P: 50. «ان ابابكر بعد ما اخذ البيعة لنفسه من الناس بالارحاب و السيف و التهديد و القوة أرسل عمر و قنفذاً و خالد بن الوليد و أبا عبيدة الجراح و جماعة اخرى - من المنافقين - إلى دار علي و فاطمة و جمع عمر الحطب على باب بيت فاطمة و أحرق الباب بالنار، و لما جاءت فاطمة خلف الباب لتردّ عمر و حزبه، عَصَر عمر فاطمة بين الحائط و الباب عصرة شديدة قاسية حتى أسقطت جنينها و أنبت مسمار الباب في صدرها و صاحت فاطمة: أبتاه يا رسول الله! أنظر ماذا لقينا بعدك من ابن الخطاب و ابن أبي قحافة! فالتفت عمر إلى من حوله و قال: اضربوا فاطمة، فانهالت السياط على حبيبة رسول الله و بضعته حتى أدموا جسمها!» [12]. Al-Ihtijaj: Abu Mansur Al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 278. «وَ أَنْتَ الَّذِي ضَرَبْتَ فَاطِمَةَ بِنْتَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ص حَتَّى أَدْمَيْتَهَا وَ أَلْقَتْ مَا فِي بَطْنِهَا اسْتِذْلَالًا مِنْكَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ ص وَ مُخَالَفَةً مِنْكَ لِأَمْرِهِ وَ انْتِهَاكاً لِحُرْمَتِهِ.» [13]. Nahj al-Haqq wa Kashf al-Siddiq: al-Hilli, Vol. 1, p. 271. «و منها أنه طلب هو و عمر إحراق بيت أمير المؤمنين ع و فيه أمير المؤمنين ع و فاطمة و ابناهما و جماعة من بني هاشم لأجل ترك مبايعة أبي بكر. ذَكَرَ الطَّبَرِيُّ فِي تَارِيخِهِ‌ قَالَ: أَتَى عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ مَنْزِلَ عَلِيٍّ فَقَالَ وَ اللَّهِ لَأُحْرِقَنَّ عَلَيْكُمْ أَوْ لَتَخْرُجَنَّ لِلْبَيْعَةِ.» [14]. Mirat al-'Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Aal al-Rasul: al-Majlisi, Vol. 5, p. 318. «أنهم لما غصبوا الخلافة و بايعهم أكثر الناس بعثوا إلى أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام ليحضر للبيعة، فأبى فبعث عمر بنار ليحرق على أهل البيت بيتهم و أرادوا الدخول عليه قهرا، فمنعتهم فاطمة عند الباب فضرب قنفذ غلام عمر الباب على بطن فاطمة عليها السلام فكسر جنبيها و أسقطت لذلك جنينا كان سماه رسول الله صلى الله عليه و آله محسنا، فمرضت لذلك و توفيت صلوات الله عليها في ذلك المرض.» [15]. Bihar al-Anwar: al-Majlisi, Vol. 82, p. 264. [16]. Al-Shafi fi al-Imamah: Sharif Murtada, Vol. 3, p. 241. [17]. Talakhis al-Shafi: Sheikh Tusi, Vol. 3, p. 156. [18]. Mirat al-'Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Aal al-Rasul: al-Majlisi, Vol. 5, p. 318.

Is there any evidence in Sunni sources regarding an attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA)? regarding the events related to the attack on the house of Lady Fatimah (SA) in Sunni narrations, there are two main categories of accounts concerning this incident: First Category (Majority of Sunni Narrations): Musa ibn Uqba describes a conflict between the supporters of Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and the pro-caliphate faction. They had surrounded Lady Fatimah's house to force Ali (AS) to pledge allegiance. The narration states: "Umar ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Fatimah along with a group of Muhajireen and Ansar, including Asid ibn Hudayr, Salama ibn Salaama, and Thabit ibn Qays. They confronted Imam Ali (AS) and Lady Fatimah (SA), and one of them even took Zubeir's sword and broke it."[1] Ibn Abi Shaybah also reports that Umar threatened to burn down Lady Fatimah’s house. He said: “O daughter of the Messenger of Allah, by Allah, no one is dearer to us than your father, and no one is dearer to us after your father than you. But by Allah, if these people gather around you, I will order them to burn down your house.”[2] Additionally, Al-Baladhuri recounts an incident where Umar forcefully entered Lady Fatimah’s house. She confronted him at the door, saying: “O son of al-Khattab, do you intend to burn my house?” Umar replied: “Yes, and this is stronger than what your father brought.”[3] Tabari also reports that Umar came to Ali’s house, where Talha, Zubeir, and some of the Muhajireen were. Umar declared: “By Allah, I will either burn down your house or force you to come out for the pledge of allegiance.” [4] Other scholars, such as Ibn Abd Rabbih,[5] Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti,[6] and Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi,[7] have also documented similar accounts. These narrations mention the attack on Lady Fatimah's house and her threat to set it on fire. However, they do not explicitly describe any action to respond to this threat. Some even state that Imam Ali (AS) went to Abu Bakr and pledged allegiance to him after this incident. Second Category (Narrations Describing Violence): Ibn Qutaybah, Abu Muhammad Abdullah ibn Muslim Dinawari (213-276 AH), recounts the following incident: Abu Bakr sent Umar to confront those who had not pledged allegiance and had taken refuge in Imam Ali’s house. Umar arrived at Ali’s house and called out, but no one came out. Umar asked for firewood and said: By the One in Whose hand is Umar's life, either you should come out and pledge allegiance or I will burn the house down on the heads of those who are in it. They informed him that Fatimah (SA) was inside. Umar replied, “Even if Fatimah is inside…” When Fatimah (SA) heard their voices, she cried out loudly, “O father” and “O Messenger of Allah.” What injustices we have seen from Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafah after you! The attackers, upon hearing Fatimah’s cries, were moved and left, except for Umar and a few others. They forcibly brought Ali outside and demanded that he pledge allegiance. Ali asked, “What will you do if I refuse to pledge allegiance?” They replied, “By Allah, we will strike your neck.”[8] Additionally, Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm ibn Sayyār ibn Hāni‘ an-Naẓẓām (185-230 AH), refers to the violation of the sanctity of Lady Fatimah (SA) by Umar. He describes how Umar struck her abdomen during the incident of allegiance, causing her to miscarry.[9] Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Husayn Mas’udi (280-345 AH), regarded by some as a Sunni scholar, recounts a similar incident. He states: “They approached Ali’s house, attacked it, and set it on fire. They pressed Lady Fatimah (SA) against the door until she miscarried Mohsen.”[10] These narrations go beyond threats. They assert that Umar forcibly entered Lady Fatimah's house, leading to the tragic events that resulted in the death of her son, Mohsen. Additional Evidence: 1. Abu Bakr’s Regret Over the Attack on Lady Fatimah’s House: It is important to mention that one of the most compelling pieces of evidence regarding the attack on Lady Fatimah's house comes from Abu Bakr's own words as he lay on his deathbed. He expressed regret for some actions he had taken, one of which involved the incident of the attack on Lady Fatimah’s house. This account was narrated by Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, a reputable figure in the Sunni tradition, and many prominent Sunni scholars have included it in their writings.[11] Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf stated: “I visited Abu Bakr during his illness, the same illness from which he eventually passed away. I greeted him and inquired about his well-being. After conveying some words to him, I said, ‘By Allah, we recognized you as a righteous man.’” Abu Bakr replied: “However, I have no hope except for three things. I wish I had not done these three things....” He continued: “As for those three actions that I regret: I wish I hadn't broken the privacy of Fatimah's (SA) house and attacked it and I would have left her alone, even if a war had broken out because of this.” In this narration, the first caliph explicitly acknowledges that he regrets attacking Lady Fatimah’s house and breaking its sanctity. This account strongly supports the historical reality of the attack, especially considering its context within the struggle for leadership. 2. Imam Juwayni’s Narration from Prophet Muhammad (SAW): Another piece of evidence supporting the occurrence of this attack and emphasizing the oppression faced by Fatimah al-Zahra (SA) can be found in a narration attributed to the respected Sunni scholar Imam Juwayni. He reported that on one occasion, the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was sitting when Hasan ibn Ali entered. The Prophet's eyes filled with tears upon seeing Hasan. Then, when Hussain ibn Ali entered, the Prophet wept once more. Following them, Fatimah and Ali (AS) arrived, and the Prophet’s tears flowed again. When asked about the reason for his tears regarding Fatimah (SA), the Prophet replied: “When I saw her, I remembered what would happen to her after my demise. It was as if I could see humiliation entering her house, her sanctity being violated, her rights being usurped, her inheritance denied, and her side being struck (causing her to miscarry). She would cry out, ‘O Muhammad!’ But no one would answer her call for help. She would seek assistance, but no one would come to her aid. She would be the first from my household to join me, appearing before me as a grieving, oppressed, sorrowful, and martyred. At that moment, I would say, ‘O Allah, curse those who wronged her, punish those who seized her rights, humiliate those who oppressed her, and eternally condemn those who struck her side until she lost her child.’ And the angels would respond, ‘Ameen.’”[12] Conclusion: Numerous narrations from credible Sunni sources provide clear evidence about the invasion of Lady Fatima's (SA) house and the inappropriate treatment she endured. These accounts have been documented by many Sunni historians and hadith scholars, including Tabari, Musa ibn Uqbah, Baladhari, Ibn Abi Shaybah, and Suyuti. They confirm that this historical event is an undeniable fact. Furthermore, some Sunni historians, such as Ibn Qutaybah Dinawari and Nizzam, have explicitly mentioned the beating of Lady Fatima (SA) and the resultant miscarriage of her fetus. [1] . Al-Iktifā’ bimā taḍmunuhu min maġāzī Rasūl Allāh (SAW) wal-thalāthatu al-khulafā’(Sufficiency with what it contains the battles of the Messenger of God - may God bless him and grant him peace - and the three caliphs): Abū al-Rabīʿ al-Kalāʿī, vol:2, p: 57. «فجاءهما عمر بن الخطاب فى عصابة من المهاجرين والأنصار فيهم أسيد بن حضير وسلمة بن سلامة بن وقش الأشهليان وثابت بن قيس بن شماس الخزرجى فكلموهما حتى أخذ أحد القوم سيف الزبير فضرب به الحجر حتى كسره.» [2] . Al-Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah: Ibn Abī Shaybah, Abū Bakr, vol: 7, p: 432. «فلما بلغ ذلك عمر بن الخطاب خرج حتى دخل على فاطمة فقال: «يا بنت رسول الله (ص) والله ما من أحد أحب إلينا من أبيك, وما من أحد أحب إلينا بعد أبيك منك, وايم الله ما ذاك بمانعي إن اجتمع هؤلاء النفر عندك; أن أمرتهم أن يحرق عليهم البيت.» [3] . Anṣāb al-Ashrāf: al-Balādhurī, vol: 1, p: 586. «فتلقته فاطمة على الباب، فقالت فاطمة: يا ابن الْخَطَّابِ، أَتُرَاكَ مُحَرِّقًا عَلَيَّ بَابِي؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ، وَذَلِكَ أَقْوَى فِيمَا جَاءَ بِهِ أَبُوك.» [4] . Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī (Tārīkh al-Rusul wal-Mulūk, waṣlah Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī): Abū Jaʿfar al-Ṭabarī, vol: 3, p: 202. «أَتَى عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ مَنْزِلَ عَلِيٍّ وَفِيهِ طَلْحَةُ وَالزُّبَيْرُ وَرِجَالٌ مِنَ الْمُهَاجِرِينَ، فَقَالَ: وَاللَّهِ لأَحْرِقَنَّ عَلَيْكُمْ أَوْ لَتَخْرُجُنَّ إِلَى الْبَيْعَةِ.» [5] . Al-ʿUqd al-Farīd: Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih al-Andalusī, vol: 5, p: 13 / Al-Istiʿāb: Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, vol: 3, p: 975. [6] . Jāmiʿ al-Aḥādīth: Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, vol: 26, p: 395. [7] . Kanz al-ʿUmmāl fī Sunan al-Aqwāl wal-Afʿāl: Al-Muttaqī al-Hindī, vol: 5, p: 651. [8] . Al-Imāmah wal-Siyāsah: al-Dīnawarī, Ibn Qutaybah, vol: 1, p: 30. «فبعث إليهم عمر ، فجاء فناداهم وهم في دار علي ، فأبوا أن يخرجوا فدعا بالحطب وقال : والذي نفسه عمر بيده . لتخرجن أو لأحرقنها على من فيها ، فقيل له : يا أبا حفص ، إن فيها فاطمة ؟ فقال : وإن ، ...... فلما سمعت أصواتهم نادت بأعلى صوتها : يا أبت يا رسول الله ، ماذا لقينا بعدك من ابن الخطاب وابن أبي قحافة ، فلما سمع القوم صوتها وبكاءها ، انصرفوا باكين ، وكادت قلوبهم تنصدع ، وأكبادهم تنفطر ، وبقي عمر ومعه قوم ، فأخرجوا عليا ، فمضوا به إلى أبي بكر ، فقالوا له : بايع ، فقال : إن أنا لم أفعل فمه ؟ قالوا : إذا والله الذي لا إله إلا هو نضرب عنقك» [9] . Al-Milal wal-Niḥal: al-Shahrastānī, vol: 1, p: 57 / Al-Wāfī bi al-Wafayāt: al-Ṣafadī, vol: 6, p: 15. «إن عمر ضرب بطن فاطمة يوم البيعة حتى ألقت الجنين من بطنها.» [10] . Ithbāt al-Waṣīyah: Masʿūdī, p: 146. :«فَوَجهُوا اِلی مَنْزلِهِ فَهَجَمُوا عَلَیْهِ وَ اَحْرَقُوابابَهُ وَ ضَغَطُوا سَیدَةَ النساءِ بِالْبابِ حَتی اَسْقَطَتْ مُحْسِنا» [11] . Kanz al-ʿUmmāl: Al-Muttaqī al-Hindī, vol: 5, p: 631 / Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī: al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Jarīr, vol: 2, p: 619 / Sāqifah wa Fadak: Abī Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Jawharī Baghdādī, p: 70. [12] . Furāʾid al-Samtayn: al-Ḥamawī al-Juwaynī, Ibrāhīm, vol: 2, p: 35. «وَ اَنِّی لَمَّا رَاَیْتُهَا ذَکَرْتُ مَا یُصْنَعُ بِهَا بَعْدِی کَاَنِّی بِهَا وَ قَدْ دَخَلَ الذُّلُّ فی بَیْتَهَا وَ انْتُهِکَتْ حُرْمَتُهَا وَ غُصِبَتْ حَقَّهَا وَ مُنِعَتْ اِرْثَهَا وَ کُسِرَ جَنْبُهَا (وَ کُسِرَتْ جَنْبَتُهَا) وَ اَسْقَطَتْ جَنِینَهَا وَ هِیَ تُنَادِی یَا مُحَمَّدَاهْ فَلَا تُجَابُ وَ تَسْتَغِیثُ فَلَا تُغَاثُ... فَتَکُونُ اَوَّلَ مَنْ یَلْحَقُنِی مِنْ اهل‌بیتی فَتَقْدَمُ عَلَیَّ مَحْزُونَةً مَکْرُوبَةً مَغْمُومَةً مَغْصُوبَةً مَقْتُولَة. فَاَقُولُ عِنْدَ ذَلِکَ اللَّهُمَّ الْعَنْ مَنْ ظَلَمَهَا وَ عَاقِبْ مَنْ غَصَبَهَا وَ ذَلِّلْ مَنْ اَذَلَّهَا وَ خَلِّدْ فِی نَارِکَ مَنْ ضَرَبَ جَنْبَهَا حَتَّی اَلْقَتْ وَلَدَهَا فَتَقُولُ الْمَلَائِکَةُ عِنْدَ ذَلِکَ آمِین.»

How Old Was Lady Fatima (s.a) When She Was Martyred? Intro There are two main theories regarding the Lady’s age; one suggests that she was 18 and is supported by Shiites, and the other one, which is advocated by Sunnites, claims her to be 28 when she set to meet her beloved father in the next life. The source of disagreement is because the exact time of Fatima’s (s.a) birthday is a place of debate. If the Lady was 18 then she must have been born after Hijra and if she was 28, there’s no choice but to say she was born before Bi’tha. Let's take a brief look at the narratives and evidence provided by both sides. The Sunnite’s theory Although the said age for the Lady from the Sunnite is not the only theory among them, it is more accepted than others. For example, there’s a narrative in which the birthday is on the 41st year of the noble prophet’s life. To support that Fatima (s.a) was 28, certain narrations were presented by them: 1) Ibn Is’haaq[1] says ALL Rasulullah’s children were born before Bi’tha except Ibrahim[2] 2) Ibn Jawzi[3] says Fatima (s.a) was born around 5 years before Bi’tha during the rebuilding of Ka’ba. 3) Al-Waqidi[4] claims that She was born when Ka’ba was being built, and Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) was 35 years old. Contradiction of the narrative with authentic hadiths from the Sunnite sources All these famous scholars have said the same thing regarding the Lady’s birthday but seems like they were oblivious to their hadiths! There are some hadiths with the same context in which the birthday of Lady Fatima (s.a) was after Rasulullah’s Meraj.[5]. These hadiths are accepted by Sunnite as well:[6] 1. As-Suyuti[7] narrates in his book, called “ad-Durar al-Manthur”, under Ayah al-Miraj that Lady Khadija conceived Lady Fatima (s.a) after Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) returned from his divine ascension (Miraj) 2. A similar narrative is transmitted in Mustadrak as-Sahihayn from Sa’d ibn Malik. It is also added to the end that whenever Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.s) longed for paradise, he’d go to Lady Fatima (s.a) 3. Dhakha’ir al-Uqba and Tarikh Baghdad, in two spots, also narrate a similar version of the narration. The authenticity of the mentioned hadith, which is narrated in various sources with valid chains according to the Sunnite perspective, clearly establishes that the theory suggesting the Lady was born before Bi'tha is firmly unacceptable. The Shiite Theory Unlike Sunnites, Shiites mostly believe that the Lady was born after Bi’tha, with a 5-year difference. This theory not only aligns with the aforementioned hadith but is also firmly supported by additional hadiths: 1. Kashf al-Qumma, vol. 1, p. 449 à Imam al-Baqir (a.s): "Fatima was born five years after Allah revealed His prophethood to His Prophet and sent down revelation upon him, while Quraysh was building the Kaaba. She passed away at the age of eighteen." 2. Usoul al-Kafi, vol. 2, p. 457à also from Imam al-Baqir: "Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad, peace be upon him and his family, was born five years after the Prophet's mission and passed away at the age of eighteen years and seventy-five days." Conclusion Rasulullah’s divine ascension (Miraj) is widely acknowledged to have occurred after his Bi’tha. Consequently, the hadiths indicating that Lady Fatima was born after the Miraj contradict the Sunni perspective. In contrast, the Shia viewpoint aligns with these hadiths and is supported by additional exclusive traditions. Ultimately, we can confidently assert that the Shia theory is more accurate and closer to the truth. [1] The famous Sunnite historian and biographer from Medina. [2] The infant son of Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) who died very young, before reaching 2 years of age. [3] The famous Sunnite jurist and historian of the sixth century. [4] The famous Sunnite historian and biographer of the third century. [5] The event of Rasulullah’s ascension to heaven, which is referred to in Sura al-Isra. [6] Al-FiruzAbadi, Faza’il al-Khamsa min as-Sihah as-Sitta, vol. 2, pp 152-153 [7] Jalal ad-Deen as-Suyuti, the famous Sunnite scholar of the 9th century.

Why did Imam Ali (AS) not react during the insult to Lady Fatimah (SA) and the burning of their house’s door? Firstly, it’s essential to note that throughout Islamic history, similar incidents have occurred where individuals were forced to remain silent due to expediency. This lack of reaction or silence was not exclusive to the event involving Imam Ali (AS). For instance, during the conversion of the family of Ammar, his mother and father were martyred under torture, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) witnessed this suffering, yet he consoled them, saying, “O family of Yasir, be patient, for your promised abode is Paradise.”[1] Even during the rebellion against Caliph Uthman, there were instances. For example, Soudan ibn Hamran attacked Uthman, severing his wife’s finger, and behaved inappropriately towards Uthman's wife. [2] In another account, a witness stated that during the attack on Uthman’s house, he saw Uthman’s wife coming out, and he struck her. Uthman looked on and cursed but did not react. [3] Is it reasonable to question why Uthman did not defend his wife or respond to the insults and attacks against her? Imam Ali (AS) did respond when they tried to harm his wife, confronting Umar, knocking him down, and striking his face and neck. But because he was commanded to be patient, he refrained from further confrontation. Imam Ali (AS) wanted to convey that if he hadn’t been ordered to endure patiently, no one would have dared to even think of such actions against him. His unwavering commitment to divine orders guided his behavior. Alusi, a prominent Sunni commentator, narrates an account from Shia sources,[4] describing the incident: Umar became angry, set fire to the door of Imam Ali’s house, and entered. Fatimah (SA) rushed toward Umar, crying out, ‘O father, O Messenger of Allah!’ Umar drew his sword, which was in its sheath, and struck Fatimah’s side. He then raised the sword to strike her arm. Witnessing this, Imam Ali (AS) suddenly rose, seized Umar by the collar, pulled him forcefully, and threw him to the ground, striking his nose and neck. [5] Despite enduring immense hardships during this event, Imam Ali (AS) followed the command he had received from Prophet Muhammad (SAW) to remain patient. In the book ‘Khasa’is al-A’imma,’ Seyyed Razi refers to this incident and writes that Prophet Muhammad (SAW) instructed Imam Ali (AS): ‘Be patient with whatever comes to you from this group until they advance against me.’[6] In other words, Imam Ali (AS) was ordered to endure patiently in the face of adversity. In a lengthy narration from Solim ibn Qays al-Hilali, it is reported that Imam Ali (AS) said to Umar: ‘O son of Sohak, if it were not for the divine decree and the covenant made by the Messenger of Allah (SAW) regarding me, you would know that you would not be able to enter my house.’ [7] Therefore, the primary reason for Imam Ali’s behavior lies in his unwavering commitment to divine orders. He exemplified complete submission to the will of Allah, as emphasized in the verse: ‘Whatever the Messenger has given you, take; and what he has forbidden you, refrain from.’[8] Imam Ali (AS) adhered to this command. In another narration, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said to Imam Ali (AS): ‘When your rights are violated and your sanctity is dishonored, be patient!’ Imam Ali (AS) responded: 'By the God who split the seed and created people, I heard that Gabriel said to the Prophet (SAW): ‘O Muhammad! Inform Ali that his sanctity will be violated.’ In continuation, Imam Ali (AS) said: ‘I accepted and consented, even though my sanctity would be violated, and traditions would be neglected…’ [9] It is worth noting that the reason for the command to exercise patience by the Prophet (SAW) was based on the interests, which were expressed differently in the words of Imam Ali. Where He said: ‘I have observed that patience in this matter is better than creating division among the Muslims and shedding their blood. Especially since people had recently converted to Islam, and the nascent religion of Islam is like a delicate plant that any neglect can lead to its corruption, and even the slightest force can destroy it.’ [10] The Imam's (AS) words conveyed that any internal conflict within the Islamic nation, specifically in Medina, could jeopardize the lives of the Prophet's family.[11] Such strife would create an opportunity for the enemies of Islam and hypocrites to easily uproot the young foundations of Islam. This concern was particularly pressing given the looming threat of an attack from the Roman Emperor, whose forces were stationed at the borders of the Islamic territory. Several conflicts had already occurred between the Roman army and the Islamic forces. The danger was so significant that Rasulullah’s final command was to mobilize an army to the borders to deter any potential Roman invasion. [12] Therefore, according to Shia narrations, the primary reason for Imam Ali’s patience during this incident was the explicit command from Prophet Muhammad (SAW) to endure patiently. This command aimed to preserve the unity of Muslims and prevent internal conflicts. [1] . Ansab al-Ashraf: al-Baladhuri, Vol: 1, P: 158 / Al-Isti’ab fi Tamyiz al-Sahaba: al-Asqalani, Ibn Hajar, Vol: 8, P: 190. [2] . Tarikh al-Tabari (History of Prophets and Kings): Tabari, Abu Jaafar, Vol: 4, P: 391 / Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh: Al-Jazari, Izz al-Din ibn al-Athir Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Muhammad (died 630 AH), Vol. 2, p. 544, edited by Abdullah al-Qadi / Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah: Al-Qurashi al-Dimashqi, Ismail ibn Umar ibn Katheer Abu al-Fida (died 774 AH), Vol. 7, p. 210, Publisher: Maktabat al-Maarif - Beirut. [3] . Karamat al-Awliya (Miracles of the Saints) from the commentary on the beliefs of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah: Al-Lalakai, Vol: 9, P: 132. [4] . Kitab Solim ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Solim bin Qais, p. 387. [5] . Tafsir Ruh al-Ma’ani: Al-Alusi, Shihab al-Din, Vol: 2, P: 120. [6] . Khasa’is al-A’imma: Sayyid Sharif al-Radi, Vol. 1, p. 73. [7] . Kitab Solim ibn Qays Hilali: Al-Hilali, Solim bin Qais, p. 387. [8] . Al-Hashr: 7. [9] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni, Vol: 1, P: 282. [10] . Nahj al-Balagha Commentary: Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Vol. 1, p. 308. [11] . As the Imam also said: "So I pondered and saw that I had no helper except my family, and I was reluctant to sacrifice them for death, and I endured the pain and drank the bitterness and patiently endured the taking of oppression." Nahj al-Balagha: Sayyid Sharif al-Radi, Sermon 26, p. 68. [12] . History of Yaqoubi: Ahmad bin Abi Yaqoob, vol: 2, P: 113.

Why is the Exact Date of Lady Fatimah's (SA) Martyrdom Uncertain? The precise date of Hazrat Fatimah's (SA) martyrdom, the daughter of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and the wife of Imam Ali (AS), has been a subject of considerable debate among Shia Muslims. Various factors contribute to this historical uncertainty. 1. Lack of Precise Historical Records: One of the main reasons for the discrepancy lies in the absence of a precise historical recording system during that time. Most significant events were transmitted orally and were rarely documented in writing. This limitation applies not only to Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom but also to other events related to the Ahl al-Bayt (AS).[1] 2. Challenges in Ancient Writing Systems: Additionally, the style of calligraphy and script prevalent during that period played a crucial role. [2] Kufic script, which lacked diacritical marks (such as dots), was common. This led to potential misreading of similar words, such as “خمسة و سبعون” (75) and “خمسة و تسعون” (95). Such errors in oral transmission of narrations and in handwritten copies contributed to differing opinions regarding the precise date of Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom. Now, let’s explore the different viewpoints regarding the date of her martyrdom: 75 Days After the Prophet's Demise: Some narrations, including those attributed to Imam Sadiq (AS) and Imam Baqir (AS), suggest that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) passed away 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) death. Al-Kulayni has narrated a hadith from Imam Sadiq (AS) in this regard in his book "Al-Kafi";[3] Allama Majlisi also quotes a hadith from Imam Baqir (AS) confirming this duration in "Bihar al-Anwar".[4] Some historians have also stated that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) passed away 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) demise. For instance, Ibn Abi Tha'lab Baghdadi writes in his book "Tarikh al-A'imah" that Hazrat Fatimah (SA) lived for 75 days after the Prophet's (SAW) demise. [5] 95 Days After the Prophet’s Demise: Other narrations suggest that Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom occurred 95 days after the Prophet’s passing. For instance, a narration from Jabir ibn Abdullah Ansari mentions that she lived for 95 days after the Prophet’s demise. [6] Prominent scholars, including Sheikh Mufid, [7] Sayyid ibn Tawus, [8] Kaf’ami in “Al-Misbah,” [9] and Allameh Tabarsi in "Alam Al-Wara"[10] assert that Lady Fatimah (SA) passed away on the third of Jumada al-Akhir in the eleventh year after the Hijra. According to this view, she lived for 95 days after her father’s departure. In conclusion, due to the reasons mentioned above and the diversity of narrations, we cannot definitively determine the exact date of Lady Fatimah’s martyrdom. However, what truly matters is our respect for all valid narrations and the observance of mourning ceremonies on both proposed dates. Such reverence is commendable and draws us closer to the Almighty. [1] . For example: Regarding the birth of Imam Hussain (as), it is stated as follows: He was born on the 3rd of Sha'ban in the 4th year of Hijri in Medina, and according to some, he was born on the 5th of Sha'ban in the 4th year of Hijri. Arabization of Muntaha al-Amal in the History of the Prophet and his Family: Al-Milani, Al-Sayyid Hashim, vol. 1, p. 523. [2] To learn more about the calligraphy of that era, you can refer to the article "History of Quranic Calligraphy and Its Evolution" written by Seyyed Mehdi Saif. [3] . Al-Kafi: Sheikh Al-Kulayni, vol. 1, p. 241. [4] . Bihar al-Anwar: Allamah al-Majlisi, Vol. 43, p. 7. [5] . A Precious Collection in the History of the Imams: a Collection of Scholars, Vol. 1, p. 12. [6] . Kifayat al-Athar fi al-Nass ala al-A'immah al-Ashar: Ali ibn Muhammad al-Khazzaz, Page: 65. [7] . Masar al-Shi'a: Al-Sheikh Al-Mufid, vol. 1, p. 31. [8] . Al-Iqbal al-Amaal al-Hasna: Al-Sayyid bin Tawus, vol. 3, p. 161. [9] . Al-Masbah - Jannah al-Aman al-Waqiyyah and Jannah al-Iman al-Baqiyyah: Al-Sheikh Ebrahim Al-Kafami Al-Amili, vol. 1, p. 511. [10] . The life of the Fourteen Infallible Ones (as): translation of "Alam Al-Wara" by Attardi, Azizullah, p. 226.

Fatima (s.a) was titled as "mukhaddara" to the point she covered herself in front of a blind person! So how could she go ahead and open the door during the invasion?!" The Origins Lady Fatima (s.a) is a powerful symbol of chastity and piety, embodying the virtues expected of an exemplary figure. As the mother of all infallible imams, she not only adheres strictly to the principles of hijab but also sets a high standard for modesty and moral integrity. Her unwavering commitment to these values is demonstrated by her practice of wearing hijab even in the presence of a blind non-mahram, underscoring her dedication to personal dignity and respect. This is why Lady Fatima (s.a) was referred to as "mukhaddara." Given this, it raises questions about the claim that she opened the door during the invasion. Explanation "mukhaddara" Mukhaddara is an Arabic term that means someone who is behind a veil. In our case however, refers to a virtuous lady who adheres to the Islamic hijab, prefers to remain in the confines of her home, and is quite respected in her community. Lady Fatima (s.a) and Lady Zeynab (s.a) are good examples of this personality. The answer 1. For starters, we should know that the mere act of opening a door for a non-mahram by a female Muslim is not prohibited in the Shari’a. Certain ahadith indicate that Rasulullah (s.a.w) also ordered his wives to open the door occasionally. For example, the late Tabarsi narrates that Rasulullah (s.a.w) was at Ayesha’s house when Ali (a.s) came and knocked on the door. Rasulullah (s.a.w) ordered, “O Ayesha! Open the door [for Ali (a.s)] …”.[1] Here, not only did Rasulullah allow her to open the door, but he also commanded her to do so, indicating that opening a door is permissible. 2. The prevalent misconception is that, during the invasion, Lady Fatima (s.a) went behind the door to open it, which resulted in her fatal injuries. This misunderstanding serves as the basis for many doubts and ongoing debates among Muslims regarding her untimely death. In truth, when Lady Fatima (s.a) saw the attackers, she rushed to the door to close it, fully aware that, according to Islamic law, they were not permitted to enter the home of the esteemed daughter of Rasulullah (s.a.w). Shaykh al-Mufid narrates: “…Fatima (s.a) thought they wouldn’t enter her house without her permission so she closed and locked the door…”[2]. The hadith serves as undeniable evidence that dispels all hypothetical issues. In any defense situation, the necessary actions must be taken, irrespective of who is carrying them out. Lady Fatima (s.a) firmly defended her home in that situation, and it is imperative that we commend her for this instead of subjecting her actions to irrelevant scrutiny. 3. Asking reasonable questions is encouraged, especially in Islam. Conversely, destructive and irrelevant inquiries are unacceptable, as they often distract us from a crucial truth: the grievous act of disrespecting the house of revelation. In essence, we are overlooking the disgraceful intrusion into the home of the Prophet Muhammad's daughter while focusing on trivial matters, such as why she was behind the door. The Noble Quran generally advises against entering a home without the owner's permission.[3] This admonition becomes even more pronounced when it comes to the residence of Rasulullah.[4] In this instance, Lady Fatima (s.a) took the precaution of closing and locking her door, clearly indicating her refusal to grant permission to anyone. She believed they would respect this prohibition; however, they disregarded all instructions and committed their transgression. 4. There is a well-established principle in Islam, grounded in the Quran[5] and a well-known Nabawi Hadith[6] called “Rule of Necessity” (al-Qa’ida al-Idhtirar) stating that committing a wrongful act may be permissible in cases of extreme emergency. For instance, while consuming the meat of a dead animal is generally prohibited, it is allowed when faced with dire hunger that threatens one’s life. In light of this principle, Lady Fatima (s.a) faced severe circumstances. The invaders were at the door, intent on breaching her home to apprehend her Imam and coercively extract an allegiance to legitimize their illegal claim to successorship. According to “a fortiori analogy”[7], what Lady Fatima (s.a) did is entirely justified. The analogy states that if, based on the “rule of necessity”, it is permissible to commit acts that are considered Islamically wrongful during times of emergency, then taking an action that is not even wrongful—such as closing the door on invaders—becomes far more justifiable. In a similar case, Lady Fatima’s daughter, Lady Zeynab (s.a), took a bold stand in similar circumstances. In the gatherings of Ibn Ziyad in Kufa and Yazid in Damascus, she recognized that silence would allow the message of Ashura and Imam Hussain’s cause to fade away. Determined to ensure their struggle was not forgotten, although it was out of her character, she set aside any hesitation. She delivered two powerful lectures that ignited a flame of hope in the hearts of all free people. [1] At-Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaaj, vol. 1, p. 197 [2] Al-Mufid, al-Ikhtisas, p.184 [3] An-Nur: 27-28 [4] Al-Ahzab: 53 [5] Al-An’am: 119 [6] Hurr al-Ameli, Wasa’il ash-Shi’ah, vol. 15, p. 369 [7] A fortiori is a Latin phrase meaning "from the stronger." In logic and argumentation, it's a type of argument where, if a particular proposition is accepted, then a stronger proposition, implied by the first, must also be accepted: Establish a weaker premise: This is a proposition that is already accepted or proven. Introduce a stronger premise: This is a proposition that is logically implied by the weaker premise. Draw a conclusion: The conclusion is that if the weaker premise is true, then the stronger premise must also be true, with even greater certainty. Example: Weaker Premise: If it is wrong to steal a car, Stronger Premise: then it’s even more wrong to steal a life.

Did Imam Ali (a.s) really marry off his daughter Umm Kulthum to Omar the second caliph?! Explanation of the Shubha There's a narrative in which Imam Ali (a.s) married his daughter to the second caliph Omar. If the story is correct then it implies there weren't any enmity between them! otherwise the Imam wouldn't have married off Umm Kulthum to the caliph. Therefore all Shia say about the raid on the house of Lady Fatima (s.a), hitting the Lady and harming her which led to her untimely death, is not true! The Answer There are 3 theories regarding the marriage of Umm Kulthum with Omar: Theory 1: There is no such person as Umm Kulthum and the name is just a kunya for Lady Zainab (s.a). On some occasions, she is mentioned in history by the name of Umm Kulthum for example: It is said that when the captives of Ashura reached Kufa Umm Kulthum delivered an eloquent speech as if Imam Ali (as) had come back to life and stood before them.[1] Some sources have claimed that the tomb in Damascus belongs to Umm Kulthum but we already know it's the sacred tomb of Lady Zainab. In other parts of the Ashura event, Lady Zainab (s.a) is again mentioned as Umm Kulthum. There's also a hadith in which Lady Fatima says that her belongings are to be passed onto Umm Kulthum! Theory 2: Umm Kulthum is Abu-Bakr's daughter raised in Imam Ali's house. Because her mother, Asma Bint Umays was the wife of Jaffar at-Tayyar – Imam Ali's brother but married Abu-Bakr after Jaffar's martyrdom, and when Abu-Bakr passed away, she married Imam Ali (a.s). Because of her devotion to the Imam (a.s), she brought her two children from Abu-Bakr to the Imam's (a.s) house. Those two children were Muhammad ibn Abu-Bakr and Umm Kulthum. So, the girl Omar married to, was the daughter of Abu-Bakr and Asma bint Umays. Theory 3: Umm Kulthum is the real daughter of Imam Ali (as) and Lady Fatimah (s.a) beside Lady Zainab and married Omar --> This theory comes with many possibilities and disagreements that reduce its authenticity: The age of Umm Kulthum at the time of marriage, whether the marriage was consummated or not, also her fate after Omar whether she lived long or died young, and whether or not she had children with Omar are just some of the ambiguities regarding this character! Not just that! When we take a look at the Sunnite narratives about this story, we see that they have many obscene wordings that are not just offensive and disrespectful to Imam Ali (as) but also rude to Omar as the second caliph of the Sunnite! For example, most of them stated Imam Ali (as) -Ma'azAllah- put on makeup on his daughter and sent him to Omar which is just outrageous! Such cheap acts are far away from Imam Ali's (as) character. They haven't spared even their own caliph and depicted him as a lustful person! Both Sunnites and Shiites believe that touching non-mahram is forbidden but in their ahadith, the Sunnites narrate that when Omar saw Umm Kulthum, he kissed her or hugged her even bared her leg Ma'azAllah! Considering all these accusations alone, the Sunnite narratives are not to be trusted. Let's not speak about the issues with the chain of the transmitters! There are also some ahadith reflected in the Shiite sources regarding this marriage but they all assert that the marriage was out of duress! In the noble book of Kafi, there is a hadith in which Imam as-Sadiq (a.s) describes the marriage as "ghasb" to indicate that it happened with ikraah or compulsion. In another hadith of Imam as-Sadiq (a.s), it is stated that when Imam Ali (a.s) refused Omar's proposal, he went to al-Abbas the Imam's uncle, and threatened him that if they didn't give him Umm Kulthum he would buy two witnesses to accuse Ali (a.s) of thievery and have his right-hand cut! So, the Imam was compelled to accept the marriage. Anybody with a fraction of impartiality would know involuntary marriage has no value and is not a sign of friendship! [1] بلاغات النساء ص 23

Is it true that Imam Ali (a.s) wanted to marry Abu-Jahl's daughter and Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) stopped the marriage? The Origins of the Shubha: This is nothing but an iftra to the Imam (a.s). The main purpose for the fabrication of this narrative is to devalue the famous Nabawi hadith regarding the high status of Lady Fatima (s.a) which is know as "Hadith al-Badh'ah". In the hadith, Lady Fatima (s.a) is recounted as "a part of Rasulullah's flesh". The hadith grants a unique and significant position to the Lady (s.a), since following that statement, Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) added that "whoever abuse her [Fatima] has abused me" meaning that those who attacked her house after Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) and harmed her, were actually harming Rasulullah (s.a.w.s). On top of that, according to ayah 57 of Surah al-Ahzab, abusing Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) is equal to being cursed in this world and the Hereafter and entails a humiliating punishment. The Possible Answer The hadith is transmitted in different ways with various details but It's Mutiwatir (successive) and can be found in both Shiite and Sunnite sources. On the Shia side, everything is crystal clear as the narrators have dealt with the story without adding marginal matters, and the “Fatima is a part of my flesh" section is common in all versions Sheikh al-Mufid and Sheikh at-Tousi have transmitted this narrative from Ibn Abi Waqqas, and Sheikh as-Sadooq has quoted Imam as-Sadeq (a.s). On the Sunnite side, however, the hadith is transmitted under the title of "the proposal of Ali (a.s) to Abu Jahl's daughter". Sahih al-Bukhari the most important hadith book of the Sunnites narrates that when Fatima (s.a) hears about the proposal, she goes to her father complaining about her husband! The narrator (al-Miswar) claims: “I had reached the age of puberty in those days when I heard Allah’s Messenger (s) addressing the people on the pulpit: Fatima is a part of me, and I fear that she may be put to trial regarding her faith. By Allah! The daughter of Allah’s Messenger and the daughter of the enemy of Allah can never be combined (in marriage) in one place. Upon hearing that Ali dismissed the proposal.” This hadith is definitely fabricated! Because of some obvious reasons: If the hadith is true, Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) has dedicated a whole sermon to his son-in-law's remarriage which is a personal matter. That would be highly inappropriate for him (s.a.w.s) because even ordinary people do not bring personal matters to the public let alone Rasulullah (s.a.w.s). In the Sunni hadith, Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) praises Abul-Aas another son-in-law of his for being honest and faithful but blames Ali (a.s) demanding him to follow the example of Abul-Aas, another improper attribution to Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) and Ali (a.s). Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) married several women and was never concerned about the religiosity of his wives but -Ma'azAllah- he's concerned about the religion of his daughter who happens to be "the Lady of All women in paradise" Indeed, Abu-Jahl was a pagan and a true enemy of Rasulullah and Islam but his daughter was a Muslim, so what's the big deal?! If the hadith is true, Rasulullah is forbidding something that is approved by Islam the very religion he was its prophet and the biggest advocator; The narrator of this hadith (al-Miswar ibn al-Makhramah) was born in the 2nd year of Hijrah and this narrative is said to be in the 8th year of Hijrah. A quick calculation tells us he was around 6 when narrating the story! It gets even more interesting to know that he claims to be at the age of puberty at that time! Abdullah Ibn Zubayr the other narrator of this hadith is a true enemy of Amir al-Mu'mineen, he was a prominent figure in the Battle of Camel (Jamal) fighting against Ali (a.s). He never mentioned and saluted Rasulullah (s) during his reign in Mecca because he believed that doing so would make Ahlulbayt happy! On top of everything, Shaykh as-Sadooq narrates a lengthy hadith in his book, Amali from "Alqamat-ibn Muhammad al-Hadhrami". He complains to Imam as-Sadiq about the unfair treatment given to him and other Shiites by the people. The Imam (a.s) sets many examples proving to him that even the prophets and Imams weren't safe from accusations. Interestingly, the Imam (a.s) says, "Didn't they accuse Ali (a.s) of wanting to marry Abu-Jahl's daughter?! And say Rasulullah went on the pulpit to blame Ali (a.s) and stop the marriage?!", "O Alqama! How strange things people say about Ali (a.s) …".

What is the teleological argument or "Burhān an-Nadhm" This argument is one of the most straightforward, as it relies on observations of the natural world rather than complex philosophical concepts. It's no coincidence that the Quran frequently points to the universe and its contents as evidence of a Creator.[1] Martyr Morteza Motahari defined this argument as the negation of the universe's accidental existence, arguing that accidents lack causes. He categorizes causes into four types: material, formal, efficient, and final. He then refutes the misconception that atheists deny the existence of efficient causes, asserting that both theists and atheists agree on this point. The primary difference lies in the recognition of a final cause. Believers in God posit a purpose and goal for the creation and its marvelous order because the mere existence of an efficient cause is not sufficient to bring about such precise order! It is necessary that there be a will and a purpose behind this order, otherwise, it would be like a child who picks up a pen and draws on a piece of paper. The child's action includes all causes, even an efficient cause, but there is no goal in it, and it is merely engaged in drawing meaningless lines on paper that have neither order nor convey any meaning. Another example for better understanding is a book. The author intends a meaning behind every word he writes, which together lead to sentences, paragraphs, and different pages, which necessarily require a specific order to convey that meaning. Just like the order we observe in the universe! Just as we infer the existence of a knowledgeable author from a well-structured and informative book, we can deduce the existence of a supreme being from the intricate order of the universe. The teleological argument posits that the universe's design necessitates a designer, much like a book requires an author. This designer, we infer, must possess attributes far beyond our comprehension.[2] [1] Quran: 2:164, 6:97, 42:29, 39:20-21 [2] Motahari, Murteza, Majmu'eh Asar, 1376, vol. 4, pp. 62-66

What is the argument of “Possible and Necessary Being”? This Argument which is called "Burhān al-Imkān wa al-Wujūb" in Arabic, is a pioneering concept of Islamic philosophers, and it is considered as one of the most robust proofs for the existence of God.[1] The argument is summarily expressed by Nasir ad-Din Tusi as follows: Everything that exists is either contingent or necessary. Contingent beings require a cause outside of themselves. If that cause is necessary, then the existence of a necessary being (God) is proven. If that cause is contingent, it too requires a cause, leading to an infinite regress. Infinite regress is impossible. Therefore, the chain of contingent beings must terminate in a necessary being.[2] Based on the argument, Allah (s.w.t) or "Wajib al-Wujud" is a being that has existence from himself as part of his nature. Nothing has grated him the existence, nothing is the cause for his existence, and nothing can cause him to cease to exist. Some simple examples: "Salt and saltiness". salt is salty by nature and nothing has given it this quality. actually it can be the cause of other thing's saltiness. "Oil and oiliness" is a perfect illustration of an intrinsic property. It's a defining characteristic that sets oil apart from other substances. "Water and wetness" serves as another simple and tangible proof for proving our point. Conclusion The existence of a supernatural being that has intrinsic quality of existence is rationally necessary, otherwise, it leads to "infinite regress" and invalidity of "principle of causality" [1] Tusi, Sharh al-Isharat wa at-Tanbihat, 1375 SH, vol. 3, pp. 66-67 [2] Tusi, Sharh al-Isharat wa al-Tanbihat, 1375 SH, vol. 3, pp. 18-20

How can the existence of God be proven? The fundamental question of proving the existence of Almighty God as the Creator and Sustainer of the universe is one of the most critical beliefs in Islam. It serves as the bedrock upon which other beliefs, such as monotheism, prophethood, and Imamate, are built. Therefore, it is essential to note that the proof of God's existence must rely on rational arguments, as the Quran and hadith cannot be used as primary evidence due to the risk of circular reasoning. Initially, it must be understood that all arguments employed to prove the existence of God are grounded in three fundamental principles that must first be established: 1. The principle of avoiding circular reasoning 2. The principle of avoiding infinite regress 3. The principle of causality. Circular reasoning It is a logical fallacy where the conclusion of an argument is already assumed in the premise. It's a flawed form of reasoning because it doesn't provide any new evidence or support for the claim. Here's a simple example: Premise: Ghosts exist because people have seen them. Conclusion: People have seen ghosts, so they must exist. As you can see, the conclusion is simply a restatement of the premise, providing no additional proof. Infinite Regress Infinite regress is a logical problem that occurs when a process or argument can be traced back indefinitely, leading to an endless loop. It often arises in situations where a concept or event is defined or explained in terms of itself, creating a circular dependency. infinite regress in causality means that every event has a cause and the cause itself has a cause leading to an infinite chain of causes. one of the ways of addressing the challenge of infinite regress, especially in theology, is to break the chain by adding an independent cause which is Allah (s.w.t) The principle of causality In Islamic Kalam, this principle is known as "Asl al-ʿilliyya", which is a fundamental concept. It posits that every event has a cause or reason behind it. This principle is closely tied to the Islamic belief in God as the ultimate cause and creator of all things.

What are the types of Tawhid (Unity of God)? Many Muslim theologians, mystics, and philosophers, relying on the Quran and the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad and the Shia Imams, have outlined various levels and degrees of Tawhid. For a better understanding, this classification is summarized as follows: 1. Unity of Essence: This is the first level of Tawhid, meaning that God is unique and without equal or substitute. God says in the Quran, " Nor is there to Him any equivalent."[1] In another sense, the unity of essence means that God is not multiple or dualistic and is free from composition. 2. Unity of Attributes: This means that God's essence is one with His attributes and that these attributes are not added to His essence. So, when we say "God is knowing, "we mean that knowledge is the very essence of the Lord and is not added to Him as a part. The same applies to other divine attributes such as power and life. God says in the Quran, " Glory to thy Lord, the Lord of Honor and Power! (He is free) from what they ascribe (to Him)."[2] The word "ascribe" refers to God being exalted from any attribute that contradicts unity and Tawhid, especially since the verse begins with glorification and refers to God's majesty. In a hadith from Imam as-Sadiq (a.s), knowledge, hearing, and sight are mentioned as being the very essence of God, and it is stated that God was all-hearing and all-seeing before there was anything to hear or see.[3] 3. Unity of Actions: Just as God is unique in His essence; He is also unique in His actions. The necessity of belief in the unity of actions is that everything that happens in this world is an act of God, and the source of the actions of all beings in the universe is considered to be the sacred essence of the Lord, as one of the well-known supplications among Muslims indicates: "There is no power and no strength except with God."[4] The unity of actions is manifested in the following: o Unity in creation, meaning that there is only one independent creator in the universe, and everyone else is dependent on His permission and will for their creation. However, this divine will does not contradict the free will of human beings.[5] The Noble Quran also signifies the concept on many occasions: “…Say, "Allāh is the Creator of all things, and He is the One, the Prevailing.”[6] o Unity of Lordship means that God alone is the independent manager of the universe; consequently, “all creatures are dependent on God in all aspects of their existence, and the dependencies they have on one another ultimately lead to the dependency of all of them on the Creator. It is He who manages some creations through others, provides sustenance to those who seek it through the sustenance He creates, and guides beings with consciousness through internal means (such as reason and other faculties of perception) and external means (such as prophets and heavenly books), and sets laws and regulations for those who are obligated, determining their duties and responsibilities.”[7] Lordship and creation are interconnected, and it makes no sense that the creator is different from the manager of creation. In the Holy Quran, it is stated: “Verily your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and the earth in six days, and is firmly established on the throne (of authority), regulating and governing all things...”[8] “[All] praise is [due] to Allāh, Lord of the worlds.”[9] o Unity in sovereignty, meaning that God alone has absolute, undisputed sovereignty over all beings in the universe. Allah the exalted says in his holy book, “Do you not know that to Allāh belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and [that] you have not besides Allāh any protector or any helper”[10] 4. Unity of Divinity: Derived from the word "ilah," a commonly used word in Islamic literature, “which means "worthy of worship" or "object of worship." Similar to ‘book’, in the sense of something that is written and has the quality of being written”[11]. The Islamic slogan of Tawhid, "La ilaha illa Allah" (There is no god but God), which is a part of the testimonies (shahadatayn), also refers to the exclusivity of divinity for God. Along with unity in divinity, there is talk of unity in worship and obedience, meaning that worship and obedience are exclusive to God. These two are in fact necessary consequences of unity in divinity. 5. Unity in Legislation: This means that only God has the independent right to legislate and judge, as stated in the Quran, "…The command rests with none but Allah: He declares the truth, and He is the best of judges."[12] Unity in legislation can also be considered a case of “unity in lordship”, as legislation is befitting of the manager of the universe. The classification provided in this text aligns with the majority opinion among Islamic theologians. Nonetheless, this doesn't preclude the existence of other classification systems or the possibility of a more exhaustive analysis. For the sake of brevity, the topics have been summarized. Consequently, to gain a more nuanced comprehension of the hierarchy and varieties of Tawhid, it is advisable to consult the elaborate explanations furnished for each subcategory. [1] Al-Ikhlas/4, Sahih International translation. [2] As-Saffat/180, YusufAli translation. [3] Sh, Kulayni, al-Kafi, vol 1, p. 107 [4] The word “hawqala” itself is not explicitly mentioned in the Quran, but the phrase 'la quwwata illa billah' (there is no power except with Allah) is found in verse 39 of Surah al-Kahf. This supplication is one of the well-known invocations among Muslims. Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Babawayh al-Qummi (Shaykh as-Saduq) has narrated that the Noble Messenger of Islam recited this supplication in the qunut of the witr prayer. (Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih, Vol. 1, p. 487). [5] Aliasghar Rezvani, Shialogy, and answering the doubts, vol. 1, p. 129 [6] Ar-Ra’d/16, Sahih International translation. [7] Ayt. Misbaah Yazdi, Amoozesh Aqayed, p. 78 [8] Yunus/3, Yusufali translation [9] Al-Fatiha/2, Sahih International translation [10] Al-Baqara/107 Sahih International translation [11] Ayt. Misbaah Yazdi, Amoozesh Aqayed, p. 79 [12] Al-An’am/57

How can the existence of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his reappearance) be proven from Sunni narrations? There are numerous narrations in Sunni sources about a person from the Ahl al-Bayt named Mahdi who will bring justice to the world. Here are some examples: 1. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said in a narration: “The Mahdi is from us, the Ahl al-Bayt.”[1] 2. In another narration, it is said, “Even if only one day remains from the life of the world, Allah will prolong that day until a man from my Ahl al-Bayt is sent. His name will be my name. He will fill the earth with fairness and justice as it was filled with oppression and tyranny.”[2] 3. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) also said, “The world will not end until a man from my Ahl al-Bayt rules over the Arabs. His name will be my name.”[3] 4. Regarding Imam Mahdi (AJTF), Sunni narrations state: “The Mahdi is from the descendants of Fatimah.”[4] 5. Al-Hakim al-Nishapuri narrates: “The Hour will not be established until the earth is filled with oppression and tyranny. Then, someone from my Ahl al-Bayt will emerge and fill it with fairness and justice as it was filled with oppression and tyranny.”[5] Based on these narrations, it is stated that from the Sunni perspective, the reappearance of a person from the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and the descendants of Lady Fatimah (SA) is certain. He will appear when the world is filled with oppression and tyranny, and he will fill the world with fairness and justice as it was filled with oppression and tyranny. [1] . Sunan Ibn Majah: Ibn Majah, Vol: 2, P: 1367. [2] . Sunan Abu Dawud: Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawud, Vol: 4, P: 106. [3] . Sunan Al-Tirmidhi: Al-Tirmidhi, Muhammad bin Isa, Vol: 4, P: 505. [4] . Sunan Ibn Majah: Ibn Majah, Vol: 2, P: 1368. [5] . Al-Mustadrak ala Al-Sahihayn: Al-Hakim, Abu Abdullah, Vol: 4, P: 600.