Search the Community

Who was Imam as-Sajjad (AS) and what do we know about His life? Imam as-Sajjad (AS), the fourth Shia Imam, is known by the name Ali ibn al-Husayn. Titles such as Zayn al-Abidin (Adornment of the Worshippers) and Sayyid al-Sajidin (Master of those who Prostrate) reflect his high spiritual status in worship. Historians differ regarding his year of birth; however, the famous view, supported by scholars such as Sheikh Mufid[1] and Sheikh Kulayni, [2] identifies 38 AH as the year of his birth. [3] There are various narrations regarding the day of his birth; some mention the 15th of Jumada al-Ula and others the 5th of Sha'ban. [4] Nevertheless, all historical sources agree that he was born in the city of Medina. [5] The father of Imam as-Sajjad (AS) was Imam Hussain (AS), and his mother, according to the popular view, was the daughter of Yazdegerd III, the last Sassanid king, who came to Medina and married Imam Hussain (AS) after embracing Islam. [6] The name "Shahrbanu" is the most well-known among her names in historical sources. [7] Numerous titles are mentioned for Imam as-Sajjad (AS) in various sources, each signifying his high status in worship, knowledge, and spirituality. Among the most famous are "Zayn al-Abidin" and "Sayyid al-Abidin." His kunyas (patronymics) include "Abu al-Hassan," "Abu Muhammad," "Abu al-Qasim," and "Abu Bakr". [8] Imam as-Sajjad (AS) had several wives, most of whom were Umm Walad. Among his well-known wives was Lady Fatima bint al-Hassan (AS)—known as "Umm Abdillah"—the daughter of Imam al-Hassan al-Mujtaba (AS), who was the mother of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (AS). [9] There is some disagreement regarding the number and names of the children of Imam Ali ibn al-Husayn (AS), [10] but a general list in reliable sources includes: Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (AS), Abdullah, Hassan, Husayn, Zayd, Umar, Husayn al-Asghar, Abdurrahman, Sulayman, Ali, Khadijah, Muhammad al-Asghar, Fatima, Aliyyah, and Umm Kulthum. [11] Imam as-Sajjad (AS), who witnessed the tragedy of Karbala himself, did not remain silent in the face of Umayyad oppression despite his immense suffering. One of the most prominent examples of this resistance was his sermon in Yazid’s court in Damascus. This assembly was intended to humiliate the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), but through the Imam’s revealing words, it turned into a scene of public awakening. When Yazid ordered the Adhan to be recited to interrupt the Imam’s speech, Imam as-Sajjad (AS) challenged Yazid by pointing to the name of the Prophet (SAW) in the Adhan, saying: "If Muhammad (SAW) is your grandfather, you are a liar; and if he is my grandfather, then why did you kill his children?" [12] This short but profound and crushing sentence not only stripped away the mask of the Umayyad government but also called upon the public conscience to judge. By utilizing the logic of lineage and his prophetic connection, Imam as-Sajjad (AS) challenged the legitimacy of Yazid’s claims and revealed the victimization of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) before everyone's eyes. The period of Imam Ali ibn al-Husayn's (AS) leadership coincided with the reign of several Umayyad caliphs, including Yazid ibn Muawiyah, Muawiyah ibn Yazid, Marwan ibn al-Hakam, Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, and Walid ibn Abd al-Malik. This period of Islamic history was marked by widespread political instability, social tension, and security crises. The political atmosphere of that era was filled with anxiety, suppression, and a lack of public safety. The governments of the time created an environment of terror and violence, leading to social isolation and the breakdown of civic cohesion. [13] This atmosphere was such that in the testament of Imamate to Imam as-Sajjad (AS), he was commanded to withdraw from the people and remain silent. [14] Therefore, his struggle against the government took a different form: the spiritual and social revival of the Shia community after the martyrdom of his father. Through his efforts, the Shia community was reshaped, and many people joined the movement of the Imamate. [15] There is significant disagreement among historical and hadith sources regarding the date of Imam Zayn al-Abidin’s (AS) martyrdom. However, the year 94 AH is the most credible and accepted among these views, and it is identified as the most likely date by several prominent traditionists and historians. The importance of this year lies in the fact that it coincided with the death of a group of prominent jurists in Medina, and for this reason, it is known in historical sources as the "Year of the Jurists" (Sanat al-Fuqaha). [16] Among the reliable scholarly figures who accepted this date are Sheikh Tusi in his book al-Misbah, [17] Muhaqqiq Irbili in Kashf al-Ghummah, [18] and the late Kulayni in al-Kafi. [19] In addition to the disagreement over the year, there are several opinions regarding the exact day of his martyrdom, including the 12th of Muharram [20] and the 25th of Muharram. It must be noted that the 25th of Muharram is more famous and accepted; several great scholars, including Sheikh Tusi [21] and Kaf’ami, [22] have recorded this day in their works as the date of the passing of Imam Zayn al-Abidin (AS). According to reliable historical and narrational reports, the martyrdom of Imam Ali ibn al-Husayn occurred by poisoning under the orders of Walid ibn Abd al-Malik. [23] His burial place is in the Baqi cemetery in Medina, where his shrine is located next to the grave of his noble uncle, Imam al-Hassan al-Mujtaba (AS). [24] At the time of his martyrdom, the Imam was 57 years old according to the famous view. [25] [1] . Al-Irshad, Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 2, p. 137. [2] . Al-Kafi, Sheikh al-Kulayni, Vol. 2, p. 512. [3] . Kashf al-Ghumma fi Ma'rifat al-Aimmah, al-Muhaddith al-Arbili, Vol. 2, p. 627 / Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 12 / Misbah al-Mutahajjid, Sheikh al-Tusi, p. 792 / Tadhkirat al-Khawas, Sibt ibn al-Jawzi, p. 291. [4] . Ilam al-Wara bi-Alam al-Huda, Sheikh al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 480 / Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 14. [5] . Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 7 / Kashf al-Ghumma, Ibn Abi al-Fath al-Arbili, Vol. 2, p. 285 / Al-Irshad, Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 2, p. 137 / Ilam al-Wara bi-Alam al-Huda, Sheikh al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 480. [6] . Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 11 / Al-Khara’ij wa al-Jara’ih, al-Rawandi, Qutb al-Din, Vol. 2, p. 751. [7] . Ansab al-Ashraf, al-Baladhuri, Vol. 3, p. 102 / Al-Irshad, Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 2, p. 135. [8] . Manaqib Al Abi Talib, Ibn Shahrashub, Vol. 3, p. 310 / Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 4. [9] . Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 64, p. 155. [10] . Manaqib Al Abi Talib, Ibn Shahrashub, Vol. 3, p. 311 / Kashf al-Ghumma, Ibn Abi al-Fath al-Arbili, Vol. 2, p. 317 / Tarikh Mawalid al-Aimmah, al-Baghdadi, Ibn al-Khashshab, p. 24 / Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 46, p. 155. [11] . Ilam al-Wara bi-Alam al-Huda, Sheikh al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 494. [12] . Jihad al-Imam al-Sajjad, al-Husayni al-Jalali, Sayyid Muhammad Reza, p. 54. [13] . Al-Imam al-Sajjad Jihad wa Amjad, Husayn al-Hajj Hassan, p. 9. [14] . Al-Kafi (Islamiyyah Edition), Sheikh al-Kulayni, Vol. 1, p. 281. [15] . Mu'jam Rijal al-Hadith, al-Khoei, Sayyid Abu al-Qasim, Vol. 21, p. 38. [16] . Tadhkirat al-Khawas, Sibt ibn al-Jawzi, p. 298 / Bihar al-Anwar, Allama al-Majlisi, Vol. 46, p. 151. [17] . Misbah al-Mutahajjid, Sheikh al-Tusi, p. 787. [18] . Kashf al-Ghumma, Ibn Abi al-Fath al-Arbili, Vol. 2, p. 294. [19] . Al-Kafi, Sheikh al-Kulayni, Vol. 1, p. 468. [20] . Ilam al-Wara bi-Alam al-Huda (Haditha Edition), Sheikh al-Tabarsi, Vol. 1, p. 481 / Al-Ithaf bi-Hubb al-Ashraf, al-Shabrawi, Jamal al-Din, p. 276. [21] . Misbah al-Mutahajjid, Sheikh al-Tusi, p. 787. [22] . Al-Misbah (Jannat al-Aman), al-Kaf'ami al-Amili, Sheikh Ibrahim, p. 509. [23] . Al-Ithaf bi-Hubb al-Ashraf, al-Shabrawi, Jamal al-Din, p. 277. [24] . Al-Irshad, Sheikh al-Mufid, Vol. 2, p. 138. [25] . Al-Kafi, Sheikh al-Kulayni, Vol. 1, p. 466.

A contemporary argument attempts to redefine the Islamic creed by reducing it to its broadest outlines. Proponents point to verses mentioning belief in God, the Last Day, the angels, the revealed books, and the prophets (Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:177 & 2:285; Surah An-Nisa, 4:136) and claim that only these five abstract categories constitute the immutable faith held by the Prophet Muhammad and his companions. Any subject or detail debated among Islamic schools—such as the nature of God’s attributes, eschatological events, or the question of leadership after the Prophet—is dismissed as a later historical “addition,” a matter of human dispute akin to choosing a favorite sports team, with no bearing on salvation. Central to this revision is the treatment of Imamate (divinely ordained leadership). The argument asserts it is purely a historical political dispute, unrelated to creed (‘aqidah). Consequently, the Prophet’s seminal pronouncements at Ghadir Khumm, about holding fast to the Quran and his Household (Ahl al-Bayt), and about the authority of Imam ‘Ali are reinterpreted as mere friendly advice or a recommendation for the best candidate, not a binding, divinely-rooted command essential for the community’s guidance. This framework, while appealing in its simplicity, collapses under the weight of the very sources it claims to uphold: the Quran and the authentic, mass-transmitted (mutawatir) prophetic traditions. A closer examination reveals that these broad principles of faith are meaningless—and indeed, cannot lead to salvation—without their necessary, Quranically-defined details. Furthermore, Imamate emerges not as a post-prophetic footnote but as the critical axis connecting and validating the core beliefs in Prophethood and the Hereafter. 1. The Illusion of “Abstract” Belief: The Case of Tawhid The speaker rightly accepts “Belief in Allah” as foundational. But does a mere, vague acknowledgment of a creator suffice? The Quran itself fills the abstract category of Tawhid (Monotheism) with non-negotiable specifics. Can one claim true belief in Allah while simultaneously attributing human form to Him? The Quran explicitly rejects anthropomorphism: “There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing” (Quran, Surah Ash-Shura, 42:11). The entire chapter of Al-Ikhlas (112:1-4) is a definitive detailing of God’s absolute, unique nature: “Say, ‘He is Allah, the One. Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent.’” To ignore these details is to risk upholding a flawed, even polytheistic, concept of God—a sure path to perdition. No Islamic school considers the specifics of Tawhid optional; they are the very essence that makes the belief valid. If the first pillar of faith crumbles without its details, why would the others be any different? 2. The Day of Judgment and Your Inescapable “Imam” The speaker also accepts belief in the Last Day (Ma’ad). The Quran, however, details a startling mechanism for that Day, making the question of leadership (Imamah) central to eschatology. Allah states: “On the Day We shall summon every people with their Imam (leader)” (Quran, Surah Al-Isra, 17:71). This verse presents a universal, inescapable reality. The Quran then defines the types of “Imams”: Imams of Guidance: These are divinely appointed leaders. They can be prophets, as with Abraham (Surah Al-Anbiya, 21:73). They can also be non-prophet leaders appointed by God for rule and guidance, like Saul (Talut): “Indeed, Allah has chosen him over you and has increased him abundantly in knowledge and stature…” (Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:247). Imams of Misguidance: Those who lead to Hellfire, like Pharaoh (Fir’awn): “And We made them leaders (Imams) inviting to the Fire, and on the Day of Resurrection they will not be helped” (Quran, Surah Al-Qasas, 28:41). The destiny is chillingly clear. On Judgment Day, Pharaoh will stand at the head of his people and lead them into the Fire (Quran, Surah Hud, 11:98), fulfilling the summons “with their Imam.” The Quran thus presents a binary choice in life: follow a divinely sanctioned Imam of Guidance toward Paradise, or follow an Imam of Misguidance toward the Fire. There is no third, neutral option. Given this sobering Quranic framework—where one’s eternal fate is tied to the leader one followed—how can the identification and adherence to the true Imam possibly be dismissed as an optional, historical political debate comparable to sports fandom? To ignore the detail of Imamate is to ignore the Quran’s own description of the ultimate accountability, risking the very damnation it warns against. 3. Prophethood and the Binding Command of Succession Belief in Prophethood (Nubuwwah) is the third accepted pillar. The Quran inextricably links true faith (iman) to absolute submission to the Prophet’s authority: “But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves, and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in full submission” (Quran, Surah An-Nisa, 4:65). The Prophet’s judgment is binding. History records that the most critical dispute to erupt immediately after his death was the question of leadership of the community. In that context, we must view his final, public, and emphatic pronouncements. At Ghadir Khumm, before a vast gathering, he declared: “For whoever I am his Mawla (master and guardian), ‘Ali is his Mawla.” This was not an offhand compliment; it was a formal, authoritative declaration in the context of a sermon about his impending passing. In the Hadith al-Thaqalayn, he said: “I am leaving among you two weighty things: the Book of Allah and my ‘Itrah (progeny), my Ahl al-Bayt. If you hold fast to them, you will never go astray.” These are not “suggestions” or “recommendations” for a preferred candidate. Their language is imperative and conditional. They tie the community’s salvation and protection from misguidance to holding fast to the Quran and the Ahl al-Bayt inseparably. To downgrade these definitive proclamations to mere advice is to violate the Quranic command of full submission to the Prophet’s judgment. Imamate, therefore, is the necessary continuation of the guiding function of Prophethood; to reject its divine ordainment is to undermine the very belief in Nubuwwah the speaker claims to uphold. Final Summation The attempt to sever broad Islamic principles from their crucial Quranic and prophetic details is a fundamental error. It creates a hollow faith, a structure without pillars. Tawhid requires specific details to be valid. Belief in the Last Day, according to the Quran, is operationalized through one’s allegiance to an Imam—of guidance or misguidance. Belief in Prophethood obligates submission to the Prophet’s binding commands about his successor and the enduring guide (the Ahl al-Bayt). Imamate is not a sectarian add-on born of historical discord. It is the divinely appointed mechanism that validates and connects the core beliefs. It is the “Imam” you will be summoned with on Judgment Day, and it is the “Itrah” you must cling to alongside the Quran to avoid straying. You cannot claim to accept the house of faith while rejecting the pillar that holds its roof from collapsing. May Allah protect our faith from deviations for the sake of His Prophet and the Prophet’s pure progeny. Amen.

The Continuity of Divine Guidance in the Quran Introduction A question arises regarding the Shia belief in the necessity of a divinely appointed guide (Hujjatullah) in every era. Some argue that this concept contradicts the Quran, citing verses that seem to indicate periods without divine guidance or the finality of prophethood. However, a holistic reading of the Quran reveals a consistent principle: Allah’s guidance is continuous and unbroken, fulfilled through both prophets and their divinely appointed successors (Awsiya') from a chosen lineage. Core Quranic Principles The Quran establishes several foundational principles that necessitate ongoing divine guidance: 1. Allah’s Unwavering Commitment to Guidance: "Indeed, upon Us is guidance."[1]. This verse presents guidance as a divine responsibility and promise, not limited to any specific time period. 2. A Guide for Every Community: "You are only a warner, and for every people there is a guide."[2]. This verse explicitly promises the presence of a Hadi (guide) for every nation, a role not exclusively restricted to prophets. 3. The Essential Role of an Imam: "On the Day We will call every people with their Imam."[3]. This underscores that every individual and era is associated with a leader (Imam)—either of guidance or misguidance—whose role is decisive for salvation. This implies the existence of a guiding Imam at all times. The Prophetic Lineage of Guidance The Quran establishes that divine selection often flows through specific, purified lineages: "Indeed, Allah chose Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of Imran over the worlds - descendants, some of them from others."[4]. This indicates a continuous legacy of chosen individuals from whom guides are raised. The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh&hp) confirmed his place in this Abrahamic lineage, as recorded in the following hadith: "Allah chose Banu Kinanah from the children of Ismail, and from Banu Kinanah He chose Quraysh, and from Quraysh He chose Banu Hashim, and from Banu Hashim He chose me."[5] The Precedent of Successors in Past Nations A crucial Quranic and historical precedent is set regarding guidance after prophets. The Quran states: "And We made from among them leaders guiding by Our command when they were patient and believed with certainty in Our signs."[6]. This shows Allah’s practice of appointing guiding leaders after prophets, as seen with the Children of Israel (like Joshua after Moses). This precedent is directly applicable to the Muslim Ummah. The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh&hp) explicitly affirmed this parallel in a widely authenticated hadith: "You will follow the ways of those nations who were before you... so much so that if they entered a hole of a lizard, you too would enter it." The companions asked, "(Do you mean) the Jews and the Christians?" He replied, "Who else?"[7]. This establishes that the experiences of Bani Israel, including having divinely appointed leaders after their prophet (as in As-Sajdah:24), are a template for the Prophet's own community. Addressing Specific Verses Cited by Opponents · Surah An-Nisa:165: This verse states that messengers were sent "so that people would not have any argument against Allah after the messengers." [8] This addresses the removal of the human excuse against Allah, not the termination of divine proof (Hujjah) for humanity. It ensures accountability but does not negate other forms of divine guidance. · Surah Al-Ma’idah:19 & al-Ahzab:40: These verses acknowledge periods without any messengers (Fatra)[9] and the finality of Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh&hp) prophethood[10]. However, they do not state that these periods are devoid of all divine guidance. The principle in Ar-Ra’d:7[11], the precedent in As-Sajdah:24[12], and the prophetic statement about following the path of Bani Israel all demonstrate that guidance continues through non-prophetic, divinely appointed successors. Quranic Evidence for Successors (Awsiya’) and Divine Guides The Quran provides further evidence for a continuing line of guidance: 1. Inheritors of Divine Knowledge & The Prerequisite of Purity: A pivotal verse states: "Then We caused those servants of Ours whom We chose to inherit the Book..."[13]. This speaks of a chosen elite (mustafawn) who inherit the Quran's profound knowledge. They are categorized in three groups, with the highest being "the foremost in good deeds by permission of Allah." This "permission" (idhn) indicates a special divine enabling tied to a state of spiritual purity. The necessity of this purity for accessing the Quran's essence is explicitly stated in the Quran: "None shall touch it [the Quran’s profound meaning] except the purified - a revelation from the Lord of the worlds."[14]. This purification (tathir) is both spiritual and moral, as the Quran equates sins with impurity[15]. Therefore, the true inheritors of the Quran’s knowledge in Fatir:32 must be of the highest spiritual purity to "touch" its inner meaning. They are the guides who, by Allah's permission, lead to the truth and are thus most worthy of being followed according to the Quran[16]. 2. The Role of Ulil-Amr (Those in Authority): The Quran introduces a distinct category of authority after the Prophet: "O you who believe, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you..."[17]. The command to obey them unconditionally (like the Prophet) implies their infallibility. Their specific role as sources of divine guidance and clarification is solidified in the subsequent verse: "And if they had referred it to the Messenger and to those in authority among them, then those who [can] draw correct conclusions from it would have known it."[18]. This verse positions Ulil-Amr alongside the Prophet as the reference to whom all dubious matters must be taken, and it specifies that among them are those who possess the divinely granted capacity (istinbat) to derive the correct knowledge from the revelation. This establishes Ulil-Amr as an elite group endowed with divine knowledge, capable of guiding the community in all matters after the Prophet. Harmonizing Quranic Verses with Authentic Prophetic Tradition The Quranic framework is perfectly embodied in the Prophetic Sunnah through definitive hadiths: 1. Hadith al-Thaqalayn (The Two Weighty Things): The Prophet declared: "I leave among you two weighty things: the Book of Allah and my AhlulBayt; if you hold fast to them, you will never go astray after me; they will not separate from each other until they meet me at the Hawd (Pool)."[19]. This hadith identifies the AhlulBayt as the enduring guide equal to the Quran and implies their infallible role in its interpretation. 2. Hadith al-Kisa’ (Event of the Cloak): This event, which is recorded in authentic Sunni and Shia sources[20] shows the Prophet gathering his immediate family (Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, Husayn) under his cloak and supplicating: "O Allah! These are my AhlulBayt and my closest kin, so remove impurity from them and purify them with a thorough purification." Since the Prophet’s supplication is not rejected, we can conclude that God has fulfilled the prerequisite of tathir (purification) mentioned in verse 79 of Surah al-Waqi’ah[21] regarding the AhlulBayt. It confirms that the AhlulBayt are the "purified" ones who can fully access the Quran's knowledge, aligning them perfectly with the "foremost in good deeds by permission of Allah."[22]—the true inheritors and guides. They are, therefore, the Ulil-Amr with the divinely granted capacity for istinbat (deriving knowledge) mentioned in verse 83 of Surah an-Nisa[23]. Conclusion The claim that the Quran negates continuous divine guidance relies on an isolated reading of verses. A comprehensive analysis reveals a coherent doctrine: 1. Allah promises a guide and Imam for every people. 2. The precedent of Bani Israel in having divinely appointed leaders after their prophets, and the Prophet's prophecy regarding the similarity between his community to Bani Israel, confirms that this Ummah also will have divinely appointed leaders after the Prophet. 3. These leaders must be the purified inheritors of the Quran’s knowledge and the Ulil-Amr with divine authority and knowledge. 4. The Prophet identified his AhlulBayt—from the chosen lineage of Ibrahim and Banu Hashim—as this inseparable, purified, and knowledgeable authority, fulfilling all Quranic conditions. Therefore, the Shia concept of the continuous presence of a Hujjatullah is a necessary and consistent conclusion from the Quran’s integrated teachings on the unbreakable continuity of divine guidance through divinely appointed and purified successors. [1] Al-Layl:12 «ان علینا للهدی» [2] Ar-Ra'd:7 «انما انت منذرٌ و لکل قوم هادٍ» [3] Al-Isra:71 «یوم ندعو کل اناس بإمامهم» [4] Ali 'Imran:33-34 «إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفَى آدَمَ وَنُوحًا وَآلَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَآلَ عِمْرَانَ عَلَى الْعَالَمِينَ * ذُرِّيَّةً بَعْضُهَا مِن بَعْضٍ وَاللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ» [5] Sahih Muslim, Book 30, Hadith 5653. [6] As-Sajdah:24 «وَجَعَلْنَا مِنْهُمْ أَئِمَّةً يَهْدُونَ بِأَمْرِنَا لَمَّا صَبَرُوا وَكَانُوا بِآيَاتِنَا يُوقِنُونَ» [7] Sahih al-Bukhari 3456, Sahih Muslim 2669. [8] An-Nisa:165 «رُّسُلًا مُّبَشِّرِينَ وَمُنذِرِينَ لِئَلَّا يَكُونَ لِلنَّاسِ عَلَى اللَّهِ حُجَّةٌ بَعْدَ الرُّسُلِ...» [9] Al-Ma'idah:19 «يَا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ قَدْ جَاءَكُمْ رَسُولُنَا يُبَيِّنُ لَكُمْ عَلَى فَتْرَةٍ مِّنَ الرُّسُلِ أَن تَقُولُوا مَا جَاءَنَا مِن بَشِيرٍ وَلَا نَذِيرٍ...» [10] Al-Ahzab:40 «مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ» [11] Ar-Ra'd:7 «إِنَّمَا أَنتَ مُنذِرٌ وَلِكُلِّ قَوْمٍ هَادٍ» [12] As-Sajdah:24 «وَجَعَلْنَا مِنْهُمْ أَئِمَّةً يَهْدُونَ بِأَمْرِنَا لَمَّا صَبَرُوا وَكَانُوا بِآيَاتِنَا يُوقِنُونَ» [13] Fatir:32 «ثُمَّ أَوْرَثْنَا ٱلْكِتَـابَ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱصْطَفَيْنَا مِنْ عِبَادِنَا فَمِنْهُمْ ظَالِمٌ لِّنَفْسِهِۦ وَمِنْهُم مُّقْتَصِدٌ وَمِنْهُمْ سَابِقٌ بالْخَيْرَاتِ بِإِذْنِ ٱللَّهِ ذَلِكَ هُوَ ٱلْفَضْلُ ٱلْكَبِيرُ» [14] al-Waqi'ah:79-80 «لَّا يَمَسُّهُۥٓ إِلَّا ٱلْمُطَهَّرُونَ * تَنزِيلٌ مِّن رَّبِّ ٱلْعَـالَمِينَ» [15] Al-Ma’idah:90 « يَـاأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا إِنَّمَا ٱلْخَمْرُ وَٱلْمَيْسِرُ وَٱلْأَنصَابُ وَٱلْأَزْلَـامُ رِجْسٌ مِّنْ عَمَلِ ٱلشَّيْطَـانِ فَٱجْتَنِبُوهُ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ» [16] Yunus:35 «... أَفَمَن يَهْدِى إِلَى ٱلْحَقِّ أَحَقُّ أَن يُتَّبَعَ أَمَّن لَّا يَهِدِّى إِلَّا أَن يُهْدَى ...» [17] An-Nisa:59 «يَـاأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا أَطِيعُوا ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُولِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ فَإِن تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُول ...» [18] An-Nisa:83 «... وَلَوْ رَدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱلرَّسُولِ وَإِلَى أُولِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنْهُمْ لَعَلِمَهُ ٱلَّذِينَ يَسْتَنبِطُونَهُۥ مِنْهُمْ ...» [19] Sahih Muslim 2408 a, Sunan al-Tirmidhi 3788. [20] Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Vol. 5, Book 44, Hadith 3205. [21] al-Waqi'ah:79 «لَّا يَمَسُّهُۥٓ إِلَّا ٱلْمُطَهَّرُونَ» [22] Fatir:32 «ثُمَّ أَوْرَثْنَا ٱلْكِتَـابَ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱصْطَفَيْنَا مِنْ عِبَادِنَا فَمِنْهُمْ ظَالِمٌ لِّنَفْسِهِۦ وَمِنْهُم مُّقْتَصِدٌ وَمِنْهُمْ سَابِقٌ بالْخَيْرَاتِ بِإِذْنِ ٱللَّهِ ذَلِكَ هُوَ ٱلْفَضْلُ ٱلْكَبِيرُ» [23] An-Nisa:83 «... وَلَوْ رَدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱلرَّسُولِ وَإِلَى أُولِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنْهُمْ لَعَلِمَهُ ٱلَّذِينَ يَسْتَنبِطُونَهُۥ مِنْهُمْ ...»

At the time of the invasion, there were others at home beside Lady Fatima (s.a) including Imam Ali (a.s), "Fidda" the Lady's servant, and some of Bani-Hashim. Why didn't they open the door instead of the Lady?! Origins According to most historical accounts, Imam Ali (a.s), "Fidda" Lady Fatima's servant, and some of Bani-Hashim were present at home during the invasion. Why should Lady Fatima, as the praised daughter of Rasulullah and the “mistress of all women of the worlds” that possesses even higher spiritual status than Lady Maryam (s.a)[1], open the door to be disrespected and beaten by the invaders?! Introduction First, we must familiarize ourselves with the circumstances surrounding that ominous day. Then, by breaking down the issue into smaller, more manageable questions, we can systematically investigate and answer each one, ultimately drawing a comprehensive conclusion. The invasion is said to have occurred around a week or so after the demise of the noble prophet of Islam.[2] A lot happened during these few days that made Imam Ali (a.s) and Lady Fatima (s.a) certain that there wouldn’t be any help from the people to support his rightful claim. They refused to swear allegiance to Ali (a.s) and there weren’t even 40 people willing to fight for him[3] to the point he complained to his late brother, “Ja’far Ibn Abu-Talib”[4]. On top of that, the Imam (a.s) was foretold about the invasion and instructed by Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) that in the case of not having supporters, he must remain patient during the crisis of successorship.[5] On the other hand, It was only a matter of time until the false leadership invaded the house of revelation to subdue Imam Ali (a.s) and take allegiance from him since they knew their caliphate would not be justified until the true claimant of successorship, Ali (a.s), had given up his rightful claim. Therefore, we can conclude that Ahlulbayt (a.s) were certain about what would happen, so they decided to make the usurpation of Imamate costly for the invaders through the resistance which was embodied by the Lady's presence behind the door. Different Scenarios On the day of the invasion, different scenarios were possible: 1. Imam Ali (a.s) opens the door; 2. Fidda the servant opens the door; 3. One of the Bani-Hashim who were at home opens the door; 4. Lady Fatima (s.a) opens the door. Here we analyze each scenario to see why the 4th one was chosen and the Lady herself opened the door: Scenario 1: Imam Ali opens the door This scenario is exactly what the invaders wanted to happen! Because in that situation, he would either swear allegiance willingly or resist and try to stop them. The first option would legitimize their false claim on the successorship of Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) so the Imam would never do that! In case of the second option, however, they would easily attack the Imam, capture him, and force him to swear allegiance. The Imam’s resistance wouldn’t also stop them from pursuing their distorted dream since they could easily brand him as a traitor to the caliphate who had stood against the rightful successor (!) of Rasulullah (s.a.w.s).[6] Scenario 2: Fidda the servant opens the door Just like in the previous scenario, had the servant opened the door, the invaders would have simply thrown her away, and gotten into the house to capture Imam Ali (a.s). A mere servant had no power to stop them nor could she do it. The self-claimed agents of the so-called caliph had a direct order to enter the house at all costs. Beating a servant, even killing her was a small cost they would be more than willing to pay for their agenda! Scenario 3: One of the Bani-Hashim opens the door The scenario of a Bani-Hashim member opening the door highlights our limited understanding of the actual events. The invasion occurred in three phases. The final wave, which targeted Ahlulbayt (a.s.), was preceded by two earlier attacks. Before the third and most devastating wave which led to Fatima’s (s.a) martyrdom, few Bani-Hashim individuals were present in the Lady’s small house but had fled during the initial two invasions, leaving only Ahlulbayt (a.s) inside. Therefore, we can conclude that: · Since the Lady’s house was so small, only a limited number of Bani-Hashim were present in the house. · All of them fled the house before the third invasion so no one was there to open the door. · Had any member remained in the house to open the door, it still would not have been enough to stop the attacker. Scenario 4: Lady Fatima (s.a) opens the door Thus far, we have come to understand that the invaders were determined to coerce Ali (a.s) into recognizing the legitimacy of their false caliphate, particularly on their third attempt, after two prior efforts had been rebuffed by him. They were willing to dismiss anyone who opposed them and were prepared to pay any price. For them, collateral damage—even the death of a maid or a member of Bani-Hashim—was deemed acceptable. The only thing that seemed to give them pause was the prospect of causing harm or suffering to Lady Fatima (s.a). The memories of Rasulullah’s (s.a.w.s) words about Fatima (s.a) were still vivid in the minds of the Muslims, [7] and her significant status was well-remembered. [8] It was this consideration that rendered their first two attempts unsuccessful, as Fatima’s (s.a) home is known as the house of revelation—one of the holiest places in Islam.[9] In fact, one of their greatest fears was how to confront Fatima (s.a) during their invasion. However, Fatima (s.a) stepped forward to meet them, and their act of invading her home and disrespecting her became the most costly and tragic decision they made in their pursuit of the caliphate. Question: What’s the point in making the usurpation costly for the invaders? When a false claimant makes a bold and costly move, everyone will always remember that, and becomes undeniable. In the pursuit of the caliphate, the invaders went to the extreme by attacking the Lady’s house. Consequently, in seeking legitimacy they couldn’t make empty excuses that Ali (a.s) withdrew from his claim or no one else was willing nor qualified so we stepped in to save the Islamic nation after Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) because the people had witnessed what they did to Zahra (s.a) to quench their thirst for power. They crossed all the redlines and destroyed the bridges behind them. The invasion was an irreversible act that made any white-washing act futile. [1] Ma’ani al-Akhbar, Sadooq, p. 107 à https://B2n.ir/e54523 [2] In another narrative, the invasion is said to happen around 50 days after Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) which has found some credibility among scholars too. Considering this narrative, the argument presented here is even more tangible, since, 50 days presents more time for Ahlulbayt to realize they need to come up with a strategy for an invasion which is going to happen sooner or later! [3] Nuri, Mustadrak al-Wasa’il, vol. 11, p. 74 à https://B2n.ir/w72918 [4] Sh. Al-Mufid, Al-Ikhtisas, sect. 2, p. 274 à https://B2n.ir/x57725 [5] Kulayni, al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 281 à https://B2n.ir/p94094 [6] Adopted from Ameli, Ma’asaat az-Zahra, Sect. 1, Ch. 7 “What if Ali answered?” [7] Shaykh as-Sadooq, al-Amali, p. 165 [8] Shaykh al-Kulayni, al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 459 [9] Jame’ah al-Kabirah supplicatio

How does the story of the Mubahala refer to Imam Ali's successorship after Rasulullah (s.a.w.s)? The story is pretty straightforward! when Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) went for the Mubahala, he was accompanied by 4 others: Lady Fatima (s.a), Imam Ali (a.s), and their two sons al-Hassan (a.s) and al-Hussain (a.s)[1]. Seeing Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) in that state, the Christians realized he was earnest. One of them said, “he’s sitting on his knees for Mubahala like the prophets”[2] trembled in fear and accepted to sign a peace pact with Muslims[3]. What makes the story of Mubahala even more interesting is they asked Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) why he had come with only his family. He answered because Allah (s.w.t) had instructed me to do so, referring to ayah 61 of Sura Aali Imran. The verse doesn't explicitly refer to Ahlulbayt (a.s) and devises a unique way to point to them. However, the phrase used for Ali (a.s) stands out. He is called the "nafs", signifying his similarity to Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) and elevating his status to be equal to Rasulullah (s.a.w.s). This argument is also echoed by Imam al-Hassan (a.s) in his letter to Mu’awiyah[4] and emphasized by Imam ar-Ridha (a.s) in his response to Ma’moun, highlighting the utmost closeness of Ali (a.s) to the position of Rasulullah (s.a.w.s) as his most important virtue. Finally, it is evident that Ali (a.s) holds the closest position to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.s) in terms of status and position, making him the most fitting person to succeed the prophet (s.a.w.s) and be designated as the leader of the Islamic nation. [1] Sayyed ibn Tawous, Sa’d as-Su’oud, p.90 [2] Ibn Shahr Ashoub, al-Manaqib, vol. 3, p.369 [3] Majlisi, Hayat al-Quloub, vol. 4, p.1305 [4] Shaykh at-Tousi, Amali, p. 563